Recent content by Theodisk

1. Keep cool. Take it easy and relax. 2. My english is not very good and its very difficult for me to describe how i think about this complex thematic. 3. I know that each human developed different. 4. What do you want from me?

Yes, but you cant categorized people with this. Each human on this earth is unique. Some of this people already. But you dont inherite all from your ancestors, many is individual of the own personality. How i sad that each human on earth is unique. Yes, some points are inheritable. But what do...

Where i had sad we are "all born same"!? You didnt read exactly what i had written. Im one of three siblings, and i know that we are individual personals. The mental evolution begins with the womb and there develop their own personalities already. Some parts of the development based on genetic...

Gadelos Tacus (old-gaelic/celtic). :grin:

1. No, each men learn other things and is better in individual things. 2. Many "talents" (not all or the most) based on "motorized" processes, which learn the body with training. Its also an personal psychological adjustment, its connected with motivation and motivation bring you to feel good...

This hole thread is "bull-shit". There are no human races, theres only one the homo sapiens sapiens. To bring the word "races" in connection to the humans, is biological absolutly false. All you human on earth have the same DNA of 99,9%. The STRs and SNPs definate the last 0,01% of DNA. This...

That the homeland of the Goths is Sweden or Gotland, its an old theory. Archeological (Wielbark-Culture) and linguistic science have demonstrated, that the ethno sailed of the Goths was on the continental (todays Poland). Look on the Wikipedia about the Goths...

Not ever defined a haplogroup also an ancient group. You cant say, R-L21 was only celtic. So its possible that some pre-celts/celts of this subclade split and a part migrate to the south of Norway and becoming a part of the Nordic (Northgermanic). Also compare the STR profiles (the DYS marker)...

Ich can say you why in corsica and sardinia were so much R1b-U152. Because when corsica would a part of france, many french people come to corsica. The demography of the native-corsican is very bad, so the genes of the french (with most R1b-U152) are dominant of corsica. Its fact. A friend of...

Also note the fact, that the north-urnfield-culture evolute to the harpstedt-nienburger-culture and jastorf-culture. The central-urnfield-culture evolute to a part of the harpstedt-nienburger-culture (which was a cultural bridge to jastorf and hallstatt) and to the hallstatt-culture. It could...

But we should differentiate ancient italic from "modern italics". The italics were indo-europeans and the first romans were etruscans. So italics were since for not so a long time romans like the etruscans. Latin were the main language of the romans, but before, the first romans spoke a language...

Because we couldnt assign all subclades to the ancient groups. And we dont know all subclades. So it is possible that there are one or two subclades which are typical italic. Maciamo says, that there are only R1b-S28/U152 typical for italic but, 1. We dont know so they realy were italics; more...

Their interpretations are not pseudo-science. Its a daughter company of family tree dna. With "italic dna" i mean typical italic subclades or profiles.

No, they dont define it with the haplogroup. The scientists from there know, that haplogroups and ancient groups were not the same. But they match specific markers and allels of a profile (not haplogroup) and could say, if it special for a ancient group. There are for every haplogroup (and...

What should it show us?!