Study link broader CEO faces with better financial performance
I would like to discuss a couple of studies published in July, then featuring in two articles in LiveScience (and here), commented by Dienekes 2 weeks ago and republished yesterday in the Time.
Originally Posted by Proceedings of the Royal Society
Originally Posted by LiveScience
Firstly, I wonder if this study works across racial and cultural groups or not ? The Japanese, like other Mongoloid people, tend to have wider faces than Caucasian people. But who would argue than your average Japanese man is more aggressive and untrustworthy or a more charismatic business leader than their European or Middle Eastern counterparts ? Actually it seems to opposite to me on all the line, and I have worked four years in Japan. Japanese people are among the most peaceful (now, times change), shy and honest people on Earth.
Originally Posted by Time
Or is it possible that wider-faced Japanese are or appear more aggressive and deceitful than long-faced Japanese ? Whether they are or not, I am convinced that one's racial group (which strongly influences facial features) and the culture and education of an individual (key factors in personality and behaviour) are more important than facial width in global comparisons.
A good example of long-faced individual is Osama bin Laden, though he surely isn't the archetype of the peaceful and trustworthy individual. Arabs are generally long and narrow faced, but are reputedly shrewd negotiators and rather aggressive people. Scandinavians are also long and narrow faced, but have a quite different character and culture.
But isn't it all a matter of perception rather than actual behaviour ? I noticed that most of the French newscasters and TV show hosts have narrow faces (examples from LCI). If the study is right, they might have got their jobs because of their more trustworthy looks. The problem is that perception and reality often don't match.
Dozens of other publications beside Time and LiveScience reposted that study. What surprises me is how people from major websites like these fail to look at the study critically, as if they were incapable of independent thinking, and just agree with all the information they get as long as it is "scientific" (regardless of the fact that scientific studies contradict each others all the time). I feel like I am living in a world where most people and most media follow sheepishly the mainstream and believe blindly everything that comes along, without trying to reflect by themselves and analyse the information they receive.