Do you think that the people in Piedmont after the fall of Rome were like the people of today? In the Collegno cemetery none of the "Italians" were similar to the northern Italians of today.
With Imperial Age samples modern Tuscans need even more than 20% northern European.
There will surely be some Germanic DNA in the Tuscans but we cannot rule out that the imperial samples are not very representative and there was some resurgence of Etruscan DNA.
Could you post the images in one of these sites and then publish them in the forum?
http://www.tinypic.com/
http://www.imageshack.us/
https://imgur.com/
That map is obsolete, according to your argument all Europeans are mostly related to Ancient Middle-Easterner people, the ENF component is anywhere in Europe (Romania 52%, Bulgaria 52%, Norway 36%, Scotland 38%, England 40%...).
Etruscans have nothing to do with Jewish and hardly Tuscans are the same of Etruscans. Jewish diaspora peaks in northern Europeans (Polish?) and Ashkenazis cluster with Southern Italians/Greeks but Ashkenazis have nothing to do with Southern Italians/Greeks.
I guess that are N and Q, typical of Uralic and Altaic people.
Oher tribes who arrived in Anatolia had undergone a process of Turkification, so They could had other haplogroups, more typical of no Turkic people, like Uyghurs that were of mixed ancestry (eurasian).
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.