Search results

A quick summarization of your "points" : 1) Haplogroup E is non African (Beyond absurd and self defeating) 2) Afro-Asiatic is non African (Beyond absurd) 3) Horn African are the result of a mixture of black Africans and non African "Caucasoids" (a theory which has been discounted...

What does rather or not it's in "Sub Saharan" Africa have to do with anything? Are you insinuating that no black people live in Saharan or Northern Africa? Have you ever heard of the genocide of Darfur? Do you know where Darfur is, well it's not in "Sub Saharan" Africa. The Chadic speakers who...

The questions still remain WHEN did the said back migration occur and why is there a complete absence of any other non African haplogroup in these heavily R carrying Central African populations? Keita makes these comments in regards to such issues:

Please do not rely on Racial Realities distortions for your argument!

From a scientific perspective the concept of "race" is invalid, which is what the term "Caucasoid" (Negroid and Mongloid ect ect) was originally used for. Therefore the debate on which "race" the ancient Egyptians should be viewed from a social perspective. The social concept of race is based...

:ashamed2: Forgive me for this error. You are the first to have brought it to my attention. The source for these numbers was based on a misreading of this table: http://olmec98.net/cruciani.jpg from the study. I did not purposely try to mislead you or anyone else. I am however correct that...

You have no "scholarly basis" to assert that they are wrong on their analysis of Diakonoff works, which is what you were essentially taking issue with. The most baffling issue with your stance is that Diakonoff himself in the exact same study that you cite proclaims a Northeast East African...

You have an utter lack of mainstream support for your stance. In other words you have absolutely no scholarly basis to assert that this peer reviewed finding is incorrect: The response by Ehret et al. to your assertion: link Keita (an authority) considers your position of a non African...

Your opinion is in direct contrast with that of reputed scholars who find sufficient support for their theory. I will post this once again: Confirmation that the proto Afro-Asiatic vocabulary was not consistent with that of farmers. You keep saying no this could not have happened but...

Based on what the study estimates their ages to be the precedence should have been given to the Fulani, since it is the oldest by the method applied, but the authors gloss over this. The age estimations was more than likely referenced from Nabil et al. (2007). The results of Nabil & co. just...

What evidence do you have for this theory? Also you have yet to explain why according to your theory there are thousands of years between when farming is seen in the Levant and when it is seen in Africa, if according to you the original Afro-Asatic speakers were farmers from the Middle East. You...

This study seems to suggest that West African populations (Fulani) share a common allele with European. It should be interesting to note that the Fulani T-13910 predates the allele which is seen in Europe. Now what exactly does this have to do with a Middle Eastern origin for Afro-Asiatic?

Please explain why the Afro-Asiatic languages for 10,000 years would have waited until they migrated into Africa to diversify? It has nothing to show for those millenniums in the Middle East but one branch, which is Semitic. It makes absolutely no sense, which is why scholarly support non...

It is "laughable" when you stand it up against that which suggest that it originated in Africa (particularly the Horn). The shear amount of the diversity of the Afro-Asiatic within the African continent (all except one) compared to that which is seen in Asia (Semitic) nullifies a non African...

The point of my additional post was just illustrating the academic support for my stance, and confirmation that my interpretations of the studies which I post are in line with mainstream scholars. I would argue that individuals before me who plastered all of those misinterpreted studies in...

I actually posted on several topics in this forum if you actually read my post history. Now compare that to another contributor to this thread and you will see that he only tends to post about this topic. On another note and with all due respect, why does that even matter you? Why does it...

In this 1980's documentary on African history by the late historian Basil Davidson, he discusses in detail how many colonial scholars distorted African history and particularly ancient Egypt. He states that all recent evidence confirms that they were black Africans from the south: Even to...

Some Egyptian art: Notice the broad African features of many of these of these pharaohs: It's clear and conclusive that these ancient Africans were indeed "black". That's not to say that individuals from elsewhere (non African) were not in ancient Egypt, but what is clearly proven is...

That is a red herring to distract from the main contention that the original population source for the Nile Valley is Haplogroup E which originated in Sub Saharan East Africa. Irregardless of where all non African haplogroups can ultimately trace their origins, the signature marker for the Nile...

Nope, the Eurocentric shenanigans ended with this one: "Newly developed methods" were used to determine the skin color of these Egyptian mummies and they all come out to be black like the Negroids who we all know that they came from. Nope sorry most studies associate M1 with East Africans...