Politics Montenegro votes for independence from Serbia

Kosovo or with full and official name: Kosovo and Metochia. Kosovo derived from Kosovo (polje) means Field of Black birds on Serbian. Metochia is greek word for monastery property. Every village, every hill, every river on Kosovo has serbian name. Kosovo was center of Serbian medieval state. All serbian cultural, historical monuments are located on Kosovo, and not only that, Kosovo has special place in Serbian national poems as the place of suffering and ressurection. It was simbol of european Christian resistance to Otoman Turks.
To stole Kosovo from Serbs is like stole Canterbery from English people, Jerusalem from Jews.
Over the centuries Albanian clans as muslims and Turk allies were settled on that holy serbian fertile land. They burned christian churches, raped christian girls, killed christian men forcefully occupying their properties and year by year, century by century they gained majority on Kosovo.
On the end of story, only with help of Nato air force, Albanians became rulers of Kosovo, killing and deporting a few Serbs that survived. Serbian monasteries, under Unesco protection, are the only religious objects in Europe today protected day and night by Nato soldiers from wild Albanians which tried several times to burn it.
And that is the true about Kosovo today. It is stolen teritory. Main thieves: Albanians, main colaborators: EU, Nato and United States.

Why you just dont Stop whith your well known serbian propaganda to present the occupier like e victim. All the world knows now that you south slavs came(invasion) in Illyrian(Balkan) peninsula from VI-VII century onwards. And changing the Illyrians, Dardanians... (Albanians) toponyms, to slavic and that does not mean that you are there before albanians.
And one more thing: Stop using the religion to make anti-albanian propaganda, because the world knows that albanians accept christianity from the I century (before slavs) and we change our religion as many times as is necessary to disringuish from the occupant (as you know-We have a survival history).
We have now 3 religions operating in harmony, because the "nation" concept to us, is more important than the religion.
P.S: Stop ruining all topics here in this wonderful forum, whith your propaganda that does not drink water anymore like before. Albanians does not have propaganda in their culture but that doesn't mean that "objectivity" will stay indifferent anymore.
 
Last edited:
It's different....with serbia they were not equal...pretty much never have been. They don't really have any benefits from being with Serbia as opposed to joining the EU. Serbia has abused the former yugoslav republics too much for any of them to wish and have to be under their dominion. I'm glad that montenegro will get independence and i hope kosovo shall get its soon as well. It would be a nice ending in the sad 90's chapter of Balkan history.
lol, what a bunch of propaganda non-sense coming from being brain-washed for years with mainstream west media, black and white picture, about evil Serbs and good everyone else...
...
I lived in Serbia...
...
in fact, in so called communism (or socialism as it was called there) Serbs were most oppressed as a nation simply because they were most populous, next most oppressed were Croatians... while e.g. Slovenians were, taking into account their low numbers, much more influential than they should have been, while Albanians benefited the most from economical help of others that was given to most poor parts...

Tito, life long ruler of comunist (or more precisely socialist) Yugoslavia was half-Croat, half-Slovenian...
only Serbs who could advance in comunist party were the ones who were not feeling as Serbs at all, who were international comunist oriented...

in fact, during communism most of top managers in Serbia were from Montenegro, as they did stick together and push each other...
even Milosevic and his closest colaborators origin from Montenegro...

and btw. that Milosevic was probably less guilty for crisis and wars in ex-Yu than leadership of some western countries, neo-nazi Croatian leadership, and NATO strategy planners who did see Milosevic as pro-Russian comunist and Serbs (being ortodox, Slavic and historically freedom striving nation) as little Russians....

I will skip explaining how surprisingly all the tragical incidents used to punish Serbs were mostly media staged... and will use just an episode to illustrate the role of USA in starting the war in Bosnia:

The Carrington-Cutileiro peace plan, named for its authors Lord Carrington and Portuguese ambassador Jorge Cutileiro, resulted from the EC Peace Conference held in February 1992 in an attempt to prevent Bosnia-Herzegovina sliding into war. It proposed ethnic power-sharing on all administrative levels and the devolution of central government to local ethnic communities. However, all Bosnia-Herzegovina's districts would be classified as Muslim, Serb or Croat under the plan, even where no ethnic majority was evident.
On 18 March 1992, all three sides signed the agreement; Alija Izetbegović for the Bosniaks, Radovan Karadžić for the Serbs and Mate Boban for the Croats.
On 28 March 1992, however, Izetbegović withdrew his signature and declared his opposition to any type of division of Bosnia, after meeting with then US ambassador to Yugoslavia, Warren Zimmermann, in Sarajevo.
What was said and by whom remains unclear. Zimmerman denies that he told Izetbegovic that if he withdrew his signature, the United States would grant recognition to Bosnia as an independent state. What is indisputable is that Izetbegovic, that same day, withdrew his signature and renounced the agreement..[1]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peace_plans_offered_before_and_during_the_Bosnian_War

Serbia won't have the choice but let Kosovo gain its independence. The Eu will pressure them on that issue. What could be worse for Serbia but be isolated within Europe ?
worse would be to give away its birthplace part of the land in order to be new Bulgaria and Romania whom noone really wants in EU....

What do you need to know? I can tell you everything.
Albanians are descendants of the Illyrians, the most ancient group of Indo Europeans that controlled the entire balkans.
In the 7th century AD, Slavic barbarians invaded and killed off most of the Illyrians, or assimilated them, except for 1 tribe, the Albanians, who managed to survive to this day.
Kosovo in Albanian is Dardania, which is an ancient Albanian Illyrian word. This land was always Albanian territory, until 1912 when Serbs stole it with the support of Russia, France, Germany, and England.

Khm, I think story you tell is just fake story you've been thought to believe in, in order to be able to fanatically hate Serbs...
Actually, there is no proof that Albanians origin from Illyrians, though I agree that as assumption it makes some sense...
Illyrians retreated from most of ex-Yu much before arrival of Slavs... they were not even mentioned in history for like 6-7 centuries before supposed arrival of Serbs...

in fact, according to historian Strabo (63/64 BC – ca. AD 24) Illyrians were destroyed well before his time...

I shall first describe Illyria, which approaches close to the Danube, and to the Alps which lie between Italy and Germany, taking their commencement from the lake in the territory of the Vindelici, Rhæti, and Helvetii.7 [2]
The Daci depopulated a part of this country in their wars with the Boii and Taurisci, Keltic tribes whose chief was Critasirus. The Daci claimed the country, although it was separated from them by the river Parisus,8 which flows from the mountains to the Danube, near the Galatæ Scordisci, a people who lived intermixed with the Illyrian and the Thracian tribes. The Illyrians were destroyed by the Daci, while the Scordisci were frequently their allies.
The rest of the country as far as Segestica,9 and the Danube, towards the north and east, is occupied by Pannonii, but they extend farther in an opposite direction.

http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus:text:1999.01.0239:book=7:chapter=5&highlight=
Strabo (63/64 BC – ca. AD 24) - Geographica

But how to explain that to several generations of Albanians who learned in their "schools" as basic fact how they are Illyrians and Dardanians and that evil Serbs did kill innocent Illyrians to steal their land which they have all right to claim back...

Albanians were not really threatened by Milosevic's regime... that was staged thing...at least in the begining... it was about their request to get republic (in order to get right to separate) and their choice to play victim by refusing to participate in political system and by refusing education in which they will not learn about evil Serbs bashing poor Illyrians in 7th century (which never happened as Illyrians were not there and as Serbs settled area peacefully in abandoned lands given to them by Byzantine emperor) ...

anyway, as a result of political decision of Albanians (which from this point of view turned out to be wise one, though the whole game they played was ultimately dishonest) two parallel worlds existed in Kosovo, two parallel school systems, political systems, medical systems, media systems,,... which is very ill situation, but Milosevic was happy as it did allow him to get 1/3 of votes in Serbian parliament just from votes from Kosovo (as Albanians ignored elections and Kosovo Serbs adored him because in previous comunism time they were heavily oppressed by Albanian community comunist leadership of autonomy area... in fact, they were so oppressed that Milosevic did manage to "buy" them by promising that no one will be allowed to physically molest them / beat them anymore... soon after he used legal means to take over political power in Kosovo and he kept power due to the decision of Albanians to boycott the system until they get republic / independence)
 
anyway, despite all obstacles there is slowly emerging truth about the people who were during the Balkan wars in western media depicted as noble heroes fighting for freedom against villain Serbs ....

Kosovo's prime minister is the head of a "mafia-like" Albanian group responsible for smuggling weapons, drugs and human organs through eastern Europe, according to a Council of Europe inquiry report on organised crime.

Hashim Thaçi is identified as "the boss" of a network that began operating criminal rackets in the run-up to the 1999 Kosovo war, and has held powerful sway over the country's government since.

The report of the two-year inquiry, which cites FBI and other intelligence sources, has been obtained by the Guardian. It names Thaçi as having over the last decade exerted "violent control" over the heroin trade.

....

While deploring Serb atrocities, Marty said the international community chose to ignore suspected war crimes by the KLA, "placing a premium instead on achieving some degree of short-term stability".

He concludes that during the Kosovo war and for almost a year after, Thaçi's forces meted out revenge against Serbs, Roma and ethnic-Albanians accused of "collaborating" with the enemy.

Thaçi and four other members of the Drenica Group are named in the report as having carried out "assassinations, detentions, beatings and interrogations". This same hardline KLA faction has held considerable power in Kosovo's government over the last decade, with the support of western powers keen to ensure stability in the fledgling state.

The report paints a picture in which ex-KLA commanders have played a crucial role in the region's criminal activity over the last decade.

It says: "In confidential reports spanning more than a decade, agencies dedicated to combating drug smuggling in at least five countries have named Hashim Thaçi and other members of his Drenica Group as having exerted violent control over the trade in heroin and other narcotics."

Marty adds: "Thaçi and these other Drenica Group members are consistently named as "key players" in intelligence reports on Kosovo's mafia-like structures of organised crime. I have examined these diverse, voluminous reports with consternation and a sense of moral outrage."

His inquiry was commissioned after the former chief prosecutor for war crimes at The Hague, Carla Del Ponte, said she had been prevented from investigating senior KLA officials.

Her most shocking claim, which she said required further investigation, was that the KLA smuggled captive Serbs across the border into Albania, where their organs were harvested.

The report, which states that it is not a criminal investigation and unable to pronounce judgments of guilt or innocence, gives some credence to Del Ponte's claims. It finds the KLA did hold mostly Serb captives in a secret network of six detention facilities in northern Albania.

Thaçi's Drenica Group "bear the greatest responsibility" for the ad-hoc prisons and the fate of those held in them.

They include a "handful" of prisoners said to have been transferred to a makeshift prison just north of Tirana, where they were killed for their kidneys.

The report states: "As and when the transplant surgeons were confirmed to be in position and ready to operate, the captives were brought out of the 'safe house' individually, summarily executed by a KLA gunman, and their corpses transported swiftly to the operating clinic.''

The same Kosovan and foreign individuals involved in the macabre killings are linked to the Medicus case, the report finds.
....


http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/dec/14/kosovo-prime-minister-llike-mafia-boss
 
Short BBC report for proponents of Kosovo independance.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/newsnight/9294175.stm

Don't buy this nonsense iapodos.

The Brits and Americans played a very wicked role in ex Yugoslavia.

The American government in those days wanted to establish peace between Israel and the Palestinians. So they had contacts with the KLA to support them.
Together with Al Qaeda agents. The KLA was also financed by countries like Saudi Arabia.
The civil war in Yugoslavia was ignited by the German minister of foreign affairs back then. Slovenia got weapons for their police force smuggled in from Austria. And so Slovenia went for independence.

That triggered a series of other bombs to explode.

Organized looting of human body parts?
Bullshit.
Too complicated to shoot them, and then sort them out.

It would be more like the Americans do..
Put them in jail or camps..
Do tests on them..
Execute them when organs are needed.

I guess the Chinese do it that way too.
:innocent:
 
Don't buy this nonsense iapodos.
The Brits and Americans played a very wicked role in ex Yugoslavia.
The American government in those days wanted to establish peace between Israel and the Palestinians. So they had contacts with the KLA to support them.
Together with Al Qaeda agents. The KLA was also financed by countries like Saudi Arabia.
The civil war in Yugoslavia was ignited by the German minister of foreign affairs back then. Slovenia got weapons for their police force smuggled in from Austria. And so Slovenia went for independence.
That triggered a series of other bombs to explode.
Organized looting of human body parts?
Bullshit.
Too complicated to shoot them, and then sort them out.
It would be more like the Americans do..
Put them in jail or camps..
Do tests on them..
Execute them when organs are needed.
I guess the Chinese do it that way too.
:innocent:

Nonsense or not, those hijacked Serbs have never been found...

I agree with the most of what you have said., but I think that KLA was able to comitt such kind of crime. All they need was just a group of surgeons and free place (northern Albania) to do so. Sex traffiking and drug trade, trade with human body parts, if you have good criminal infractracture throughout of Europe and Middle East, it is not important what is the object of trade.

What I was trying to emphasyze here is effort of some intelectuals on this forume and in Europe which for a long time trying to assure us how such kind of criminal structure deserve independent state. Independent state, for what? For trading with human organs? Hasim Thaci, prime ministar of so called Republic of Kosovo in this Report of Dick Marty, which was accepted by Counsil of Europe, was described as main organizator and head of criminal beast.
 
KLA are nothing but narcoterrorists hence why they where on the FBI's list of terrorist groups involved in the drug trade up until 1998. As for indepenadance that wont be lasting to long i dont think they have set a very dangerous precedant especially when you have some EU(SSR) countries approaching 20% muslim and relations between the two arent getting any better
 
Are you talking about about Montenegro or Kosovo ? When was either of them independent before (to print stamps) ?

Montenegro was an independant nation from 1400's to 1918.... or most of its modern history
 
I totally agree wit Duo's post. My country gained independance from former Yugoslavia 16 years ago and it was the best decision me coult have made. Too much money went to Belgrade with no apparent benefit. We are now EU members and on 1st January Eurozone members.

Things are really complicated, politicaly, in Serbia. kosovo independance is pending and Serbia won't, in my opinion, let that happen. The radicals threatened armed conflict if Kosovo secedes.

As for Montenegro, I'm sure that there will not be any conflicts. Serbs have other problems and Montenegro was never percieved as part of Serbia, wheres kosovo is a birthplace of Serbian nation.

Slovenia broke off from yugoslavia because milosevic cut your customs funding seeing as all the customs collected on any border in yugoslavia went to slovenia. When YOU quite recieving money from yugoslavia you decided to break off not vice versa...
 
Slovenia broke off from yugoslavia because milosevic cut your customs funding seeing as all the customs collected on any border in yugoslavia went to slovenia. When YOU quite recieving money from yugoslavia you decided to break off not vice versa...
never heard of this...
and do not believe it can be truth...
Slovenians collecting customs on all borders would just be insane...

Slovenians had reasons to separate...they were economically ahead of the rest and felt others as weight placed upon them...

point is in the way they separated...
they made media war in which they were good guys who are attacked, while in reality they encircled military barracks, cutting their food and water supply and shooting on Yugoslav army units made at the time mostly out of 18 year old kids who were serving army in Slovenia...
very brave...

they "won" the war... in reality, if Yugoslav army had a grain of wickedness that was attributed to it in west media, they would respond to this by flattening some town with ground and threat to flatten all of Slovenia (which could be done in few hours) if Slovenia's politicians do not order stop of the attacks... in fact, this is probably what any army would do... but Yugoslav army was based on ideological concept of brotherhood of Yugoslav nations...

so, they just tried to resist attack in surrounded barracks...after 10 days of being surrounded in military barracks, and of being targets for snipers of Slovenian newly formed army, Yugoslav army just retreated to the rest of Yugoslavia... in fact, any army in the world would react on such attack with full force... "wicked" JNA did not react at all... they allowed Slovenian hunters (blinded with hate and fear spread by media in years before) to shoot down 44 kids serving in the army, to wound another 146 and to molest around 5000 who surrendered....

with Croatia was different, because there lived big Serbian minority that was majority in up to 1/3 of Croatian territory.... clashes started after Serbs were kicked from status of nation in Croatia and put into status of being minority... in their view (which may or may not be correct), Croatia with its new neo-nazi leadership was on the road to finish what it has started in second world war when it was nazi ally who treated local Serbs with moto: "kill 1/3, deport 1/3, and convert to catholics the remaining 1/3" and who did that fairly according to the plan at least with the killing part... in first months of that war, Yugoslav army was even playing role of buffer between two sides... which was weird role as it by than consisted mainly of Serbs, as Croats, Slovenians, Bosnian muslims, Albanians deserted...

after several incidents, army was in the conflict with Croatian forces... of course, this was not without influence of Serbian politicians who naturally tried to influence the army's leadership to protect Serbs in Croatia...

in fact, Yugoslavia constitution had fuzzy defined secession. and was interpreted by Slovenian and Croatian political leaders and media as right of republics to separate, and by Serb politicians as right of nations to separate...

thus, Serb leaders took the attitude that if Croats want to separate they can do that but same right have Serbs living in Croatia... especially because borders of Croatia were drawn by comunist regime, because there was genocide in second world war, and because Serbia as one of the winners of the first world war had right to take those parts and more in 1918, but instead decided to welcome Croats and Slovenes in the Yugoslavia as brother nations.

To remind you, Serbia has lost in first world war around 1/3 of its citizens... too many lives sacrificed to give the gained teritories as a present to a nation who does not know to respect that and that brutally kills your people whenever history gives them a chance...

so, while west saw Milosevic as a butcher, he, as bad as he was, was in fact almost a hippie compared to other politicians who were in power in ex-Yugoslav republics... but he had a big disadvantage - he was on the way of US strategic plans for global domination... also, Germany government of that time was strongly pushing Croatia's independence...
 
I think the USA wanted to flatten Yougoslavia. Just to get a trading route from Europe to the Middle East. Remember that Dubya Bush wanted to get Turkey in the EU!
The idiot was thinking Europe was another American State on the flag.
Well, we're not.

Turkey has to sort out existing problems with Armenia and Kurdistan before they ever can be member of the EU. Period.

Remember that Greece and Turkey are both NATO members that until today have the highest rate of people serving in the military. And that because of threats between them.
I can't accept that.
 
never heard of this...
and do not believe it can be truth...
Slovenians collecting customs on all borders would just be insane...

Slovenians had reasons to separate...they were economically ahead of the rest and felt others as weight placed upon them...

point is in the way they separated...
they made media war in which they were good guys who are attacked, while in reality they encircled military barracks, cutting their food and water supply and shooting on Yugoslav army units made at the time mostly out of 18 year old kids who were serving army in Slovenia...
very brave...

they "won" the war... in reality, if Yugoslav army had a grain of wickedness that was attributed to it in west media, they would respond to this by flattening some town with ground and threat to flatten all of Slovenia (which could be done in few hours) if Slovenia's politicians do not order stop of the attacks... in fact, this is probably what any army would do... but Yugoslav army was based on ideological concept of brotherhood of Yugoslav nations...

so, they just tried to resist attack in surrounded barracks...after 10 days of being surrounded in military barracks, and of being targets for snipers of Slovenian newly formed army, Yugoslav army just retreated to the rest of Yugoslavia... in fact, any army in the world would react on such attack with full force... "wicked" JNA did not react at all... they allowed Slovenian hunters (blinded with hate and fear spread by media in years before) to shoot down 44 kids serving in the army, to wound another 146 and to molest around 5000 who surrendered....

with Croatia was different, because there lived big Serbian minority that was majority in up to 1/3 of Croatian territory.... clashes started after Serbs were kicked from status of nation in Croatia and put into status of being minority... in their view (which may or may not be correct), Croatia with its new neo-nazi leadership was on the road to finish what it has started in second world war when it was nazi ally who treated local Serbs with moto: "kill 1/3, deport 1/3, and convert to catholics the remaining 1/3" and who did that fairly according to the plan at least with the killing part... in first months of that war, Yugoslav army was even playing role of buffer between two sides... which was weird role as it by than consisted mainly of Serbs, as Croats, Slovenians, Bosnian muslims, Albanians deserted...

after several incidents, army was in the conflict with Croatian forces... of course, this was not without influence of Serbian politicians who naturally tried to influence the army's leadership to protect Serbs in Croatia...

in fact, Yugoslavia constitution had fuzzy defined secession. and was interpreted by Slovenian and Croatian political leaders and media as right of republics to separate, and by Serb politicians as right of nations to separate...

thus, Serb leaders took the attitude that if Croats want to separate they can do that but same right have Serbs living in Croatia... especially because borders of Croatia were drawn by comunist regime, because there was genocide in second world war, and because Serbia as one of the winners of the first world war had right to take those parts and more in 1918, but instead decided to welcome Croats and Slovenes in the Yugoslavia as brother nations.

To remind you, Serbia has lost in first world war around 1/3 of its citizens... too many lives sacrificed to give the gained teritories as a present to a nation who does not know to respect that and that brutally kills your people whenever history gives them a chance...

so, while west saw Milosevic as a butcher, he, as bad as he was, was in fact almost a hippie compared to other politicians who were in power in ex-Yugoslav republics... but he had a big disadvantage - he was on the way of US strategic plans for global domination... also, Germany government of that time was strongly pushing Croatia's independence...

believe what you want it is true. they where tito's pets. not suprising considering he was half slovenian himself they had very priveleged status and they collected customs from every single yugoslav border

but rest what you have said is true
 
@how yes no and others

Two sides to a story... had a link but cant do link yet....


Thing is in war there are allot of victims… You try to play the role as only victims.
Was there deaths of innocent Serbs in the Balkan wars? Yes!!!
Is it only the fault of others? No – You guys need to stop the blame game. Your politicians and the decisions they made have Lost Kosovo for the Serbs.

The normal masses of the people in the Balkan need to demand from their politicians to stop this neo national fanaticism. On how great and noble they are and how evil every one else is.

Balkan self propaganda is based on – The Good, The bad and the Eviel.

In general all Balkan nations or should I say people need to think of the future. Right now to the rest of Europe you all remain primitive in the manor you all conduct your selves.

What if other countries in Europe did this? Germany and France – England Germany – Do you think that the people of these nations obsess over every, of the countless wars they have fought. Do their politicians bang on the National drum all the time? For if the rest of Europe conducted them selves in the same manor. Romanticizing every war – every death and territory lost. Well then Europe would be like the Balkan.


You are all too easy to manipulate from the ones that hold power. All of you need to take a good long look in the mirror.

No amount of Web warrior propaganda is going to change the View Europe has of people the Balkan. In Fact it confirms the stereotype.

And this is comes from a half Slav and Half Albanian…
 
@how yes no and others

...


Thing is in war there are allot of victims… You try to play the role as only victims.
Was there deaths of innocent Serbs in the Balkan wars? Yes!!!
Is it only the fault of others? No – You guys need to stop the blame game. Your politicians and the decisions they made have Lost Kosovo for the Serbs.
...
In every bigger conflict or war, both sides are deeply believing they are right, and have solid arguments for their viewpoints... especially when there is long history of conflicts, emphasizing snapshots of situation from different timepoints give strong arguments to both sides.... well, there is nothing strange in that...same we see in any conflict between two or more persons... both sides are deeply convinced they are in right...

I do not try to reverse black and white picture of Balkan wars into white and black picture... what I set as question is whether it was really black and white as it was presented? obviously not... but it was presented in black and white way... and such media representation lead to situation that one side was punished, other rewarded...
 
i think montenegro will be followed by other european regions... belgium may split very soon. scotland, catalonia and basque country then...
 
It is off topic but sins you seem to focus on that we can talk about Kosovo.

Even if we assume that every bad action on the Serbian side is western propaganda. The Serbians decision to move the army in to Kosovo was at best foolish.

It comes down to public image of the leaders and people. Again even if we take Serbian take on events that Serbian bad global image was purely due to propaganda and had no merit. They are still factors that should have been considered by the political leadership.

Main leaders facing each other were on Serb side Slobodan Milosevic and on Kosovo Albanian side Ibrahim Rugova.

Milosevic international image was extremely bad he was seen as a fanatical nationalist, unreasonable and as a person who played a part or was at fault for the unfortunate events in Bosnia. In short he was seen as an ultra Nationalistic genocidal mad man even if that was propaganda.

Rugovas image was rather good. He was seen as a moderate and reasonable person. He followed a policy of non violence and passive resistance. His reputation among Albanian also gave him power to hold back the elements that wanted violent confrontation.

International mediated negotiation The Albanians called for a reversion to the Yugoslav constitutional right they had before they were removed by Milosevic.

Now taking this in to consideration the worst action Serbia could take was to move the Army in to Kosovo in an attempt to keep Kosovo.

You also must consider the shame the international community felt in relation to what happened in Bosnia. When the Army moved in to Kosovo there was a public demand that there should be done something. The Albanian was considered an unarmed civilian group. There wasn’t even an Albanian Police force.

In short the loss of Kosovo and bombings of Belgrade was down to good leadership and bad. Even if you subscribe to the most insane conspiracy theories it was still an illogical and bad tactical move on the Serbian side. Unless of course if there is a theory that the Serb army did not move in to Kosovo. Then yes the Serbian leadership is absolved of any wrong doing.

In my opinion the worst thing that has happened to the Serb people is that they were unlucky to have Milosevic as their leader. I belive that many Serbs would aggre in that assesment.
 
Let's see now if they will merge Kosovo with Albania. That seems like the most logical thing to do, but I am not an expert on the matter.

I am in favour of the independence of Kosovo, but only if it is in accordance with the principles expressed in the Declaration of Independence i.e. implementation of the Ahtisaari plan. It would hopefully bring democracy, equality and rule of law to the society in Kosovo. Merger with Albania is completely unacceptable, realisation of the irredentist idea of "Ethnic Albania."
 
I am in favour of the independence of Kosovo, but only if it is in accordance with the principles expressed in the Declaration of Independence i.e. implementation of the Ahtisaari plan. It would hopefully bring democracy, equality and rule of law to the society in Kosovo. Merger with Albania is completely unacceptable, realisation of the irredentist idea of "Ethnic Albania."

Why not? you are supporting Makedonian Issue and want Greeks and Bulgarians and Albanians under an Ex-Communist mafia organised by Tito, but you do not want Kossovo unite with Albania?
Why not?

as you say the only Legal is the Kossovo constitution,

Let the majority of Kossovo people deside,
 

This thread has been viewed 53739 times.

Back
Top