Animals Whaling nations set for majority

Would you or have you eaten whale meat?

  • Yes I eat whale meat all the time.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Yes, I eat whale meat occasionally.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • I have eaten whale meat before and it is one of my favourite types of meat.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • I have eaten whale meat before and is good but not great as far as meats go.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • I have eaten whale meat before but it was pretty average as far as meats go.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • I have eaten whale meat before but was really disappointed by it.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • I have eaten whale meat before and it was disgusting/gross.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Yes I have eaten whale meat, and would try it again.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Yes I have eaten whale meat, but wouldn?ft try it again.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • I have not eaten whale meat before, but would like to try it.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • I have not eaten whale meat before and would not consider trying it.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • I have not eaten whale meat before, but might try it if someone had already bought it for me.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • I think its fine for people to do whaling in any situation.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • I think its ok for people to do whaling as long as there is a reasonable limit to it.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • I think it?fs acceptable for people to do whaling for scientific research/purposes.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • I do not think it?fs acceptable for people to do whaling in any situation.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Other...

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0

Tokis-Phoenix

Regular Member
Messages
290
Reaction score
14
Points
0
Location
England, Somerset
"Pro-whaling nations look set to command a majority of the votes when the International Whaling Commission (IWC) annual meeting begins on Friday";

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/5066538.stm

Full report:
"Several countries which appear likely to vote with the pro-whaling bloc have joined the body in recent weeks.

UK marine affairs minister Ben Bradshaw said he is "very concerned".

A pro-whaling majority could lead to the scrapping of conservation and welfare programmes, though not a return to full-scale commercial whaling.

That would need three-quarters of delegates at the meeting in St Kitts & Nevis to vote in favour, which is extremely unlikely.

But a simple majority would be enough to end IWC work on issues which Japan believes to be outside its remit, such as welfare and killing methods, whale-watching and anything concerning small cetaceans such as dolphins.

"For the first time since the 1970s, the IWC would be under the control of the whalers," commented Vassily Papastavrou, a marine biologist working with the International Fund for Animal Welfare (Ifaw).

"Japan has said that it intends to undermine decisions which protect whales and stop the conservation work of the IWC," he told the BBC News website.

Divided world

The potential for collision is higher at this year's meeting than it has been for decades.


"Hindus don't eat beef, that's their choice, but they don't try to prohibit the rest of the world from eating it"
Rune Frovik



Formed in 1946, the IWC's original purpose was to regulate commercial whaling; and after it became obvious that some species were being depleted to the verge of extinction, that regulation took the most robust form possible: a global moratorium.

Norway made a formal objection to the ban and has continued to hunt, though catching radically fewer numbers than a century ago. Japan, and more recently Iceland, hunt under an IWC ruling which allows nations to catch whales for "scientific research".

Both have stepped up the size of their annual hunts in recent years, with the 2006 catch on target to exceed 2,000, the largest take since the introduction of the moratorium in 1986.

Pro-whaling nations insist that a limited return to commercial hunting is possible; stocks of some species are high enough, they maintain, charging that the IWC has become an organisation dedicated to preventing whaling, contrary to its purpose.

At the IWC's foundation is supposed to be sound science; arguments such as which stocks are sufficiently robust to hunt are in theory answered on a strict scientific basis.

But there are huge variations in estimates of minke whales, the species currently most hunted, which makes it almost impossible to set global catch limits.

The scientific process has also become mired in politics, with decade-long discussions on a mechanism called the Revised Management Scheme, designed to facilitate a return to limited commercial whaling, breaking down earlier this year.

The anti-whaling bloc is now led informally by Australia, New Zealand and Britain, with the US a major ally


Within the last year this group has co-ordinated letters of diplomatic protest to Norway and Japan, signed by 12 and 17 countries respectively.

"They are losing the argument, internationally and domestically," said Ben Bradshaw.

"None of the pro-whaling nations have markets for the meat; young Japanese, Icelanders and Norwegians don't eat it, consumption is falling."

This argument is countered by organisations supportive of whalers and whaling, such as Norway's High North Alliance.

"We think there is growing support for whaling in principle and in practice," said its secretary Rune Frovik.

"Whales belong to the animal kingdom. In some cultures they eat frogs, others don't; Hindus don't eat beef, that's their choice, but they don't try to prohibit the rest of the world from eating it.

"And we think that you can't find anything more environmentally friendly than whale meat - this is an animal which lived in nature, we are harvesting nature's surplus and you don't have to destroy nature to do that."

Horse trading

Whatever the moral rights and wrongs, it seems like that after years of trying the pro-whaling bloc may have built itself a working majority this time.

The run-up to each IWC meeting sees the opposing groups of nations trying to bring supportive new members into the organisation.


THE LEGALITIES OF WHALING
Objection - A country formally objects to the IWC moratorium, declaring itself exempt
Scientific - A nation issues unilateral 'scientific permits'; any IWC member can do this
Aboriginal - IWC grants permits to indigenous groups for subsistence food
The Marshall Islands, Guatemala and Cambodia have reportedly joined in recent weeks at Japan's behest.

But an accurate tally will only be possible when the Commission convenes on Friday in St Kitts; only then will it become clear which countries have sent delegates and paid their subscriptions, entitling them to vote.

"[The pro-whaling nations] had a majority last year on paper," said Ben Bradshaw, "but because some of their allies failed to turn up or pay their dues we won all the votes - but one of them by only one vote."

The fallout of a pro-whaling majority would be, in Mr Bradshaw's words, "international uproar".

How far the anti-whaling leaders would be prepared to go diplomatically against Japan, Iceland and Norway, with whom they have so much common ground on issues other than whaling, is a moot point.

There is talk of action aimed at the tourism industries of countries which have recently supported whaling, especially the small Caribbean states such as this year's host, St Kitts and Nevis.

A delegate from one of the anti-whaling nations told the BBC News website there would not be an organised boycott, but the word would be put out that certain nations which portray themselves as holiday destinations resplendent with natural beauty had supported the killing of whales."



Looks like the animal rights wellfarists and activists and similar people are perhaps losing out on this battle?
There also seems to be contrasting opinions on how much the japanese youth and general population really like whale meat. So here's a poll, would you ever try or eat whale meat? Do you agree with whaling or not or would it depend on the situation?
 

This thread has been viewed 6300 times.

Back
Top