L
^ lynx ^
Guest
Looks like Eupedia have been mentioned in too many internet's pigsty. I won't make the same mistake twice.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Well, nordicists exist in your country also there, as there are in mine, and is in Croatia and other countries.
Nordicism was created to overcome the strong inferiority complex that nordic people suffered, because of the mediterranean superiority in achievments and history. So, they had to invent childish stories like the romans and greeks were Norwegians, that blondism is superior, etc.
The excuse they invented for the fall of the Portuguese Colonial empire was because we turned mulattos.
But I don't know what's the excuse for the fall of the Spanish Empire. Some of them try to push the trivial levels of sub-saharan admixture in Spain as reason of the fall.
Poor things, we can't blame them, they are only unloved children
Coon was a physical anthropologist. I haven't read much of his work, maybe a few paragraphs, but to discredit his work based on the idea that he's racist is not logic. That is my only view on the subject, to make asserts otherwise, and falsify what i have stated, is an extreme error in rhetoric.
I don't agree with Sprinkles on most subjects, but his logic here is sound. I'm saying this regardless of the fact that I didn't read anything Coon wrote.
Listen to this.
We also know that Darwin was a racist, at least by our standards now.
http://www.apologeticspress.org/articles/12
Does this fact discredit all his work?
Is theory of evolution and natural selection invalid?
Is Darwin:
Insecure racist idiot; poorly educated intra-race racist; a charlatan; who is racist, is biased, thus his works cannot be objective; racist fraud and delusional etc.
We also know that he was wrong in his geological hypothesis.
Hmmm, what that would leave us with? Creationism?
One could argue that mare description of differences between races is still good science and not racism. It could be used to improve medications and treatments. I'm pretty sure scientific racial profiling is used by white doctors curing people in Africa.
Unfortunately it can be also used to divide races, it could be used by racists to demean and abuse.
Racism starts with negative emotions towards other races, racial slurs, followed by apartheid politics or ethnic cleansing. In racism the most important is the intent and not pure science.
PS. I didn't write this to defend Coon or Darwin.
I think it makes no sense now to compare Coon and Darwin for example...if Coon was a racist and delusional that doesn't mean we have to search for world's most famous scientists who perhaps were racists too to justify his work.
anyway,what you've written is mostly pure krap.
Southern Croatia(Dalmatia) is mainly western-Med,and northern Croatia is Alpine/CM.To conclude fizical look of south croatian/hercegovian croatian is different than north Croatian,but not by much,usually south croats are bit darker and taller.
Well, yeah, but that's maybe a bit oversimplified.Southern Croatia(Dalmatia) is mainly western-Med,and northern Croatia is Alpine/CM.
cheers
Anyway,If you're in for fun,our Serbian friend continues with his 'scientific' conclusions on another forum
http://www.forumbiodiversity.com/showthread.php?t=2248&page=11
http://www.jutarnji.hr/davis-cup--samo-split-i-zagreb-zele-mec-sa-srbijom-/636840/everything i ahve said there is true im still waiting for your "scientific" ideas
This thread has been viewed 189664 times.