Now explain 5th century depopulation and drastic change of cultures in former land of Veneti. If Veneti are Slavs then why they changed their culture to the simpler one? Who the heck made them change their traditions and arts?
Veneti didnot change...
as I said they were just not in Poemerania at the time of the cultures you describe...they settled there only after 5th century... there lived Germanic Ruggi, Lemovi, Vandals, Goths and Scirii (Scirii lived east of Goths, west of Balts and north of Veneti, which in fact might point out to proto-Serbs of Balkans since they had to pick up somewhere haplogroup N before bringing it to Serbia ... this is not too probable though since Scirri are considered east Germanic, but than again so are Veneti...thing is to early Greek and Roman historians Germanic vs. Sarmatic was about way of living, not about origin, to simplify it it was about living in house or being nomads... than again I2a2 might have originally been Germanic as other clades of haplogroup I were
anyway, look at the
map showing reconstructed positions of tribes for around 1 AD:
http://www.euratlas.net/history/europe/1/entity_2750.html
Secondly the name changes you exampled are the autochthonous changes. Jordanes is a forein historian writing about foreign land.
So, what do you want me to say that Jordanes who lived in time when that was happening has no clue what he writes about, but that you and some biased 19th century historians who had very limited access to information (e.g. I can today click few links and get to read Jordanes Gethica while for them it was not easy to get to any of the manuscripts) know what have happened...
sorry, but I don't buy that...from you speaks your bias...
Goths "just" went through the Veneti land, and they know this land as Veneti.
they didnot just went through that land...
they first lived for awhile north of those people, than they moved slowly for like 100 of years through that land, then they lived south of Veneti but among Sarmatians...among Antes as well...
so, no, saying that Antes are of Venetic race just can not be a mistake..
Do you know country name Magyarorszag? Why foreigners call it Hungary???!!!
Nearby countries actually do not call it Hungary...it's a name in english...
Name Hungary is used because kingdom of Hun left strong impression and all following invaders(Avars, Magyars) were condsidered to be of similar turkic origin... there is no similarity with Venets who were not aggressive or well organized empire with strong reputation...
in fact, it was also called Turkia... But Hungary is not called Hungary in neighbouring nations, there the name for that country is related to the name of Magyars...
and Gothi were for long time in neighbourhood of Veneti and Sarmatians (note that Antes that Jordanes says are of Venetic race were previously always counted as Sarmatians, which is in fact probably because Veneti and Sarmatians are single race)...
Ah, to add a twist to it, the half of Hungary population is R1a! Now that's a history behind that, right?
Country was obviously populated with Slavs before Magyars...
in fact you can also see that east and west Hungary actually form cluster with Serbs, Croats, Romanians, and central Ukraine... while central Hungary is cluster for itself... which indicates that Magyars have settled in central part of today Hungary and did subjugate and assimilate previous inhabitants east and west of them...
from "Geostatistical inference of main Y-STR-haplotype groups in Europe"
Amalia Diaz-Lacavaa, Maja Waliera, Sascha Willuweitb, Thomas F. Wienkera, Rolf Fimmersa, Max P. Baura, and Lutz Roewerb
Quote:
In Southeastern Central Europe and the Balkans several clusters were alternatively predominant. Two circumscribed and densely sampled areas stood out from the surroundings: central Anatolia (cluster 5) and central Hungary (cluster 14). It is worth mentioning that while a genetic differentiation of central Anatolia is in accordance with previous studies [17] and [18], a reliable characterization of the not sampled surrounding areas may require further evaluation. Two clusters were assigned to large areas of the Balkan Peninsula: (1) Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, Romania, Western and Eastern Hungary, and Central Ukraine: cluster 18; (2) continental Greece, Bulgaria, and Macedonia: cluster 2. Cluster 13 was assigned to Albania and to the western area of the Balkans and cluster 11 to the Caucasus.
cluster 18 - Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, Romania, Western and Eastern Hungary, and Central Ukraine
but judging by clustering it is due to I2a2... meaning that much of R1a might have come with Magyars..
I do not know why you expect that all people speaking uralic languages share N haplogroup... as I said, cultures and languages change, but haplogroups stay and tribal names tend to stay with majority of people...
I can imagine that Magyars were Scythian R1a tribe living in close proximity to uralic tribes of Asia and that their cultural development was influenced by uralic people... they might have had N elite, since there is like 1% of N in Hungary (which is much less than in Serbia and Bosnian Serbs or in Balts and Belarus, and Rus)
in fact, in research above, cluster 14 (central Hungary) is closest to cluster 4 which is western Fenno-Scandianvia and not to cluster of west and east Slavs or to a cluster of Finland and Baltic, which points out that Magyars might have been originally same R1a population that did settle Scandinavia, but were under domination of Uralic tribes...