Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Under which stone and on what planet do you live?
LMAO, graeco-aryan and armeno-aryan = 100% pure nonsense...
Iranian/Aryan (Kurdish & Persian) are far more related to Slavic languages that to Armenian.
You are a weird dude. Greeks (or Armenians) have NOTHING to do with Aryans. Btw, Greeks are even more Afro-Asiatic than Indo-European. And even those 'Indo-Europized' native Europeans have not so much to do with Aryans...
Under which stone and on what planet do you live???
You definitely do live on the other planet.you are nuts and you are allien
I gave you 2 modern theories and still speak of bullshit
Aryan = Greeks Armenians Phrygian Iranian -Sanskrit
I guess the word ar exist more in Greek and sanskrit than in your language?
probably you never heard the word Graeko-aryan
and now your dreams drope
The Medes served in the expedition equipped in precisely the same manner; for this equipment is in fact Median and not Persian: and the Medes acknowledged as their commander Tigranes an Achaimenid. These in ancient time used to be generally called Arians; but when Medea the Colchian came from Athens to these Arians, they also changed their name. Thus the Medes themselves report about themselves. The Kissians served with equipment in other respects like that of the Persians, but instead of the felt caps they wore fillets: and of the Kissians Anaphes the son of Otanes was commander. The Hyrcanians were armed like the Persians, acknowledging as their leader Megapanos, the same who after these events became governor of Babylon.
Μῆδοι δὲ τὴν αὐτὴν ταύτην ἐσταλμένοι ἐστρατεύοντο· Μηδικὴ γὰρ αὕτη ἡ σκευή ἐστι καὶ οὐ Περσική. οἱ δὲ Μῆδοι ἄρχοντα μὲν παρείχοντο Τιγράνην ἄνδρα Ἀχαιμενίδην, ἐκαλέοντο δὲ πάλαι πρὸς πάντων Ἄριοι, ἀπικομένης δὲ Μηδείης τῆς Κολχίδος ἐξ Ἀθηνέων ἐς τοὺς Ἀρίους τούτους μετέβαλον καὶ οὗτοι τὸ οὔνομα. αὐτοὶ περὶ σφέων ὧδε λέγουσι Μῆδοι. [2] Κίσσιοι δὲ στρατευόμενοι τὰ μὲν ἄλλα κατά περ Πέρσαι ἐσκευάδατο, ἀντὶ δὲ τῶν πίλων μιτρηφόροι ἦσαν. Κισσίων δὲ ἦρχε Ἀνάφης ὁ Ὀτάνεω. Ὑρκάνιοι δὲ κατά περ Πέρσαι ἐσεσάχατο, ἡγεμόνα παρεχόμενοι Μεγάπανον τὸν Βαβυλῶνος ὕστερον τούτων ἐπιτροπεύσαντα.
The Arians were equipped with Median bows, and in other respects like the Bactrians: and of the Arians Sisamnes the son of Hydarnes was in command. The Parthians and Chorasmians and Sogdians and Gandarians and Dadicans served with the same equipment as the Bactrians. Of these the commanders were, Artabazos the son of Pharnakes of the Parthians and Chorasmians, Azanes the son of Artaios of the Sogdians, and Artyphios the son of Artabanos of the Gandarians and Dadicans.
Ἄριοι δὲ τόξοισι μὲν ἐσκευασμένοι ἦσαν Μηδικοῖσι, τὰ δὲ ἄλλα κατά περ Βάκτριοι. Ἀρίων δὲ ἦρχε Σισάμνης ὁ Ὑδάρνεος. Πάρθοι δὲ καὶ Χοράσμιοι καὶ Σόγδοι τε καὶ Γανδάριοι καὶ Δαδίκαι τὴν αὐτὴν σκευὴν ἔχοντες τὴν καὶ Βάκτριοι ἐστρατεύοντο. [2] τούτων δὲ ἦρχον οἵδε. Πάρθων μὲν καὶ Χορασμίων Ἀρτάβαζος ὁ Φαρνάκεος, Σόγδων δὲ Ἀζάνης ὁ Ἀρταίου, Γανδαρίων δὲ καὶ Δαδικέων Ἀρτύφιος ὁ Ἀρταβάνου.
http://arberiaonline.com/viewtopic.php?f=34&t=626
Goga your tables are from outdated data (offcourse noone can prove the existance of Greco-Aryan group but it is a fair theory)...
Indo-European languages are related with various ways like :
1. Centum/Satem group where Latin/Germanic/Celtic/Greek/Tokharian are classified as Centum while Balto-Slavic, Albanian, Armenian, Iranian, Indo-Aryan are classified as Satem
2. Greek, Phrygian, Armenian, Iranian and Indo-Aryan share the past aorist augment,a charachteristic wich is absent in all other languages and unites them in a broader group within Indo-European languages
3. Greek like Iranian has (h) instead of (s) infront of words (compare Greek hepta=seven with Latin septe=seven or Greek herpeton=serpent with Iranian haoma=drink of Gods instead of Sanscrit Soma)
4. There exist some isoglosses among the Greco-Aryan languages that are exclusive to them
I'm familiar with that hypothetical Graeco-Aryan (Graeco-Iranian) family language. Of course is Aryan (Iranic) language part of a proto-IE language, but proto-IE is not part of Aryan languages. Aryan evolved from proto-IE. But that doesn't mean that other modern IE langauges are Aryan too. That's nonsense.Goga your tables are from outdated data (offcourse noone can prove the existance of Greco-Aryan group but it is a fair theory)...
Indo-European languages are related with various ways like :
1. Centum/Satem group where Latin/Germanic/Celtic/Greek/Tokharian are classified as Centum while Balto-Slavic, Albanian, Armenian, Iranian, Indo-Aryan are classified as Satem
2. Greek, Phrygian, Armenian, Iranian and Indo-Aryan share the past aorist augment,a charachteristic wich is absent in all other languages and unites them in a broader group within Indo-European languages
3. Greek like Iranian has (h) instead of (s) infront of words (compare Greek hepta=seven with Latin septe=seven or Greek herpeton=serpent with Iranian haoma=drink of Gods instead of Sanscrit Soma)
4. There exist some isoglosses among the Greco-Aryan languages that are exclusive to them
I'm familiar with that hypothetical Graeco-Aryan (Graeco-Iranian) family language. Of course is Aryan (Iranic) language part of a proto-IE language, but proto-IE is not part of Aryan languages. Aryan evolved from proto-IE. But that doesn't mean that other modern IE langauges are Aryan too. That's nonsense.
Armenians are descendants of Urartu and Urartu folks weren't even Indo-European, but Caucasian. Armenians are just a bunch of racists and religious fanatics that believe in their own fairy tales and Hollywood stories.
I thought that Kurdish is closer to Russian (proto-Slavic languages) than to Greek. Because of the Scythians. Think about Kurdish name for gold is 'zir' and in Russian it is 'zolota'. What happened is in Kurdish: 'che bu' and in Russian: 'chto bilo'. Woman is in Kurdish: 'zjin' and in Russian 'zjina' or 'zjensjina'. And there're countless other examples...
And I think you're right. Kurds have a different origin than Greeks, because Kurds have far more I & R1a (28.5-44.5 %) haplogroups, but slightly less r1b (8-17 %) haplogroup than Greeks (in general). They share some j2 and Greeks have much more e1b1b.In fact anatolian Greeks are more closely to Levantines and more local to minor asia than kurds,
they share a j2a which exist only in them,
Indeed Kurds are a lot different than Greeks (and all other Europeans) because they score 10% South Asian component in Autosomal analysis(0-1% in Europe) and as low as 5% NEuropean component (which is 25% in Greece)And I think you're right. Kurds have a different origin than Greeks, because Kurds have far more I & R1a (28.5-44.5 % - Iraq Kurds-Turkey Kurds) haplogroups, but slightly less r1b (8-17 % Turkey Kurds-Iraq Kurds) haplogroup than Greeks (in genereal). They share some j2 (7-28.5% - Turkey Kurds-Iraq Kurds) and Greeks have much more e1b1b.
j2 %
Which haplogroup in Kurds is South Asian? Maybe they do consider r2 as South Asian. Kurmanji Kurds in North Kurdistan have very much r2, but r2 can also be found among peoples of Caucasus (Ossetians, Chechens etc.) and East Iranians, like Tajiks...Indeed Kurds are a lot different than Greeks (and all other Europeans) because they score 10% South Asian component in Autosomal analysis(0-1% in Europe) and as low as 5% NEuropean component (which is 25% in Greece)
This thread has been viewed 70891 times.