This is not a Rule. This is only what you assume. And out of your assumed probability you make a fact by not even taking in account some of the F* might be N and some other might be G*. instead of saying ~5% J1 ~2,5% N and ~4% G* for example, you assume and make out of it all J1 and H?
This is very much possible didnt some other Studies found J2* in very high diversity on Anatolia? And you now confirmed it is possible to be some subgroups so how do you come to the idea, to give us ,"f* being J1" as a fact?
We basically dont know what F* is some of it is very archaic according to Nasidzes.
And could you please explain me why you used a study about Kurds from Jordan to point out J1 among Anatolian Kurds?
This is my only problem I have with your methods. We dont know what F* really is, but you assume that most of it has to be J1 and make a fact out of it. A assume doesent give you the right to make "facts".
I for example confirmed that it is very possible that some of the F* might be J1 it could be 3-5% maybe 6-8% also possible only 2%. I cant know this thats why I assumed something like half of the F* being J1.
And beside that like Goga mentioned. The F* values found among Kurds are M89.
Page Five
http://www.zazaki.org/files/Kurds.pdf
Here more about M89
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_F_(Y-DNA)