Because it predates the ethnogenesis of the groups in question by such a long time that claiming connections between ethnic groups / places is just ridiculous.
I guess most of history and of your claims are ridiculous as well in that case.....
we here have genetics as additional clue to reconstructing long time history....
I've been trying to tell you all along that your purported "tribal" connections are all nonsense.
nope, for long time intervals they have much more sense than linguistics...as they are identity of tribes...
they are transfered from one generation to next same as last names in individuals...
while words change much faster on timeline...
that is why genetics is more likely to coincide with tribal names than with languages...
You know that the area is named for the town of
Halych, and is completely unrelated with the Celts/Galatians. Even the image you uploaded bears the name "Halychyna".
sure...
there is complete layer of such Germanic oriented history...
e.g. Russians that got name by Varangian tribe Ros ...just there was no Varangian tribe Ros except among Russians... and of course tribal name Russians have nothing to do with tribal names such as Rosch and Thracians, Rasena (Thyrsenians).. but R1a somehow matches both Rasena and Russians...
different branches of Veneti are completely unrelated people...but somehow we find I2a* exactly and only in places where they lived in Britanny and north of Adriatic
Sherdana sea peoples came from north...they basically started conquest from southeast shores of Black sea, place name left after them is Serbonian bog, but they are Sardinians...yes, right...
it seems almost as if official history is not a science but a political manifesto that reflects interests of powerful ...
No, but it shows your connection of some wild migrations of a "Germanic" tribe are inaccurate. If it was, shouldn't the Basques and Sardinians be Germanic, too?! :wary2:
nope...
Germanic language is wrongly called Germanic...it is Scandinavian...
Sardinians are Cimmerians thus original Celtic origin...
but you have to realize that language timeline is much more fast paced than genetics-tribal/race name relation.....tribal/race name is preserved and genetics are preserved (I2a), but language has changed...
Basques are most R1b people in the world...their link to I2a only exist in some Maciamo's wild guess post...
Which, as I have proven, is complete nonsense because the Germanic people didn't originally refer to themselves as "Germani" (meaning your linguistic connection of tribal/region names is nonsense), and because I2a evidently isn't associated with the Germanic peoples or with the region of Kerman, but clearly was present in Europe already during Neolithic - long before the Germanic languages emerged, or the term "Germani" was applied to them.
hello...
that is what I tell you all along...
Germani is wrongly applied to Germans due to I2b among them..
but real Gomer were Cimmerians... they are original Celts.... that is very clear from combination of historic and genetic evidences I presented...
Also, "Germani" does not mean "seed". To quote myself
why would your wild guess be more valid than writing of ancient Rome historians?
Additionally: the root word is also attested as *gerro- ("short") in that
Proto-Celtic dictionary.
sure, it is attested as 'germ' in english as well...
you can't just take word of a language and blindly use it to give meaning to tribal name... that is ridiculous...
Those are not cognates. Serbian "ljudi" is a cognate with the following words in other Slavic languages:
Czech - Lidé
Polish - Ludzie
Belorussian - Liudzi
Slovenian - Ljudje
Russian, Ukrainian - Lyudy
Ostensibly, this is a cognate with the following:
German - "Leute"
Lithuanian - "Liaudis"
Latvian - "Ļaudis"
so, what is Gothic word for "teuta"?
Gaulish - Touta
Irish - Tuath
Welsh - Tud
Gothic - Thiuda
German - Deutsch
Latvian - Tauta
Latin - Tota/Totus (doesn't mean "tribe" or "people", but "whole" or "all" - compare English "total")
As you can see, sound laws have no exceptions.
lol
you use single example to show that there are no exceptions????
laughable logic...
of course there are exceptions....
languages are live thing, they keep developing... and loan words are passed by people who hear them and try to repeat them in own language...and hearing (ability to repeat heard) of individual people do not always adhere
to general sound laws...
did you ever play as a kid a game in which one tells a word to next one, the next one passes it to next one, and so on... in word loan game those people speak different languages and have no abilities to properly hear it and repeat it...
I'm not sure what the cognate in Slavic would be, but it may not be attested - this is something that sometimes happens, for instance, modern Germanic languages have no cognate with the PIE word "Ekwos" (horse), though some of the older ones verymuch had (Anglo-Saxon "Eoh", Gothic "Aihws").
konj
It's also clear that R1b (at least, certain subclades of it) is associated with the spread of Celtic-speaking peoples, and that I2a is associated with the Pre-Celtic population of Western Europe.
I would not bet on that...
I think R1b is spread of pre-Hittite Hatti from Asia minor to Europe... I guess that tribal name Hatti gave rise to range of Germanic tribal names like Goths, Hatti... and also Getae (Dacians)...