wrong, read here.
http://www.forumbiodiversity.com/showpost.php?p=302246&postcount=54
He indeed had a bias against Kurds. We dont claim that he did false "Genetic§ studies on Kurds but that he indeed did interpreted the Results false.
Read the post again, he did not draw the map wrong, this was actually a map made by me and it was still based on Dr. McDonald's analysis, not Humanist, basically the placement of the Assyrian samples at the time (Older analysis) was placed in Northwest Iran and the Kurds were a little further east close to North Central Iran, I was the one who suggested moving them a little west based on the trend, and guess what? That's exactly what Dr. McDonald's new analysis did, all the new updates show that, Kurds in Northwest Iran and Assyrians in the North Iraq junction.
Exactly, this is why there was no manipulation in those maps, it was a suggestion, and this suggestion is actually part of the new analysis updates.You know as much as me, that Dr. McDonald places all samples a bit too far East. All samples used so far were actually from Iran and Iraq. Even the one Kurd from Anatolia tested before had his origins documented from Northwest Iran. Even ethnologists placed the origin of his tribe (Sinemli) in North Iran who settled in Central Anatolia.
Read here
http://www.forumbiodiversity.com/showpost.php?p=528599&postcount=36
His dialect is more close to Kurmanji from Northwest Iran than Anatolia. So it is no surprise that Zert is the only Kurd so far, who is placed by Dr. Mcdonald on Anatolia. Simply because he is the only real Anatolian Kurd tested so far.
Actually, Assyria as a kingdom existed before Mitanni, the establishment of Mitanni was around 1500 BC, the older Assyrian period started around 2000 BC, and before that the area belonged to the Akkadian empire before it was overthrown by the Gutium, during the Akkadian times it was called "Subartu", either way, I'm talking about Dr. McDonald's analysis and where he placed the samples in his new updates, if you or anyone else has a problem with that, you can email him and ask him why his analysis says that, it's much better than blaming Humanist who has nothing to do with this, better yet, why not test yourself and send your sample for analysis? I believe only then you'll believe in this (The other Kurds have all updated their analysis, you can check their results on ABF, you'll see the maps attached).North Iraq in his first step was never called "Assyria" but Hurria-Mitanni, Gutium. In second step Assyria and in third Median confederation. The Time line lies so much in the past that it seems very absurd to discuss about which Empire first appeared in North Iraq. Everything b. c. is very old in this area and can be seen as native.
Please Cobol19 dont start with this kind of things. And like I said Madai were only a confederation build up by tribes who early moved into this Region like Gutians, Hurrians, Scythians, Cimmerians and so on.
I've got a question for the Assyrian fellow members on this site. Do you guys think that you're related to the ancient Mitanni & Guti? Please, I really want to know that...
Goga, so long as you remain hostile and paranoid, there will never be any discussiong going on with you, so you can keep talking to yourself.