0 out of 1 members found this post helpful.
Originally Posted by Taranis
hey, why did you delete my post explaining everything?
do you understand how unfair is it to argue by deleting arguments other people make....
what kind of person are you?
do you have any morality, any sense of fair play? can you look yourself in mirror?
in short, insult is about putting a person into low worth position, and my comparison was clearly not an insult but about lack of competence of a person not educated in some area of science to criticize work of people educated in that area of science... the work that passed harsh peer review...face it, you are hobbyst, you do not know how to estimate from samples how old is a haplogroup, so you do not have enough competence to state it is flawed..
your ego could see it as an insult if you are kind of person that judges worth by job and gender and think that cleaning ladies and housewives are low worth creatures....
and I gave in that post great summary of my theories on this site, and explained why large set of coincidences is in my viewpoint not a coincidence (as it is not probable), but is instead pointing to deeper causal connection and why i explain it the way I do.......it was easily my best post ever on this site......
I demand my post to be restored.... if you have any sense of fair-play or any morality you will restore it... ..