1 out of 1 members found this post helpful.
This is very doubtful. As you may know, a sample of R1b-U106 (along with R1a and R1a has been found in the Lichtenstein cave in northern Germany, dated to circa 1000 BC. Regarding R1a, it is of course known to have been in Central Europe since the Corded Ware period, and it stands to reason that the people of the Battle Axe culture (an offshot of Corded Ware in Scandinavia) were carriers of R1a as well. The question is the ethnic identity of these peoples. While it's likely that they were Indo-European, it's doubtful that they could have been "Germanic" in any recognizable way. Regarding R1b, we know that it was in Central Europe by Urnfield times, even though we do not know when it arrived (the Beaker-Bell Culture is often suggested, and there have been a lot of arguments for and against the Beaker-Bell Culture). In any case, this very likely predates the Germanic ethnogenesis. From the linguistic perspective, it's clear that the Proto-Germanic language wasn't spoken until the iron age, and I personally find it very unlikely that the Proto-Germanic peoples of the (iron age) Jastorf Culture were not carriers of R1b.
Originally Posted by GloomyGonzales