Eupedia Forums
Site NavigationEupedia Top > Eupedia Forum & Japan Forum
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 51 to 54 of 54

Thread: The Gedrosia component and the origin of R1b M269

  1. #51
    Elite member Achievements:
    1 year registered5000 Experience Points
    spongetaro's Avatar
    Join Date
    14-01-11
    Posts
    704
    Points
    9,098
    Level
    28
    Points: 9,098, Level: 28
    Level completed: 58%, Points required for next Level: 252
    Overall activity: 9.0%


    Country: France



    Hello, has someone informations about Johanna Nichols’s Bactrian theory of Indo-European homeland? There must be some evidences in it of the links between european R1b and the Gedrosia component.

  2. #52
    Regular Member Achievements:
    1000 Experience Points1 year registered

    Join Date
    25-10-11
    Location
    Brittany
    Age
    64
    Posts
    966
    Points
    4,635
    Level
    19
    Points: 4,635, Level: 19
    Level completed: 97%, Points required for next Level: 15
    Overall activity: 58.0%

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    R1b - L21/S145

    Ethnic group
    more celtic
    Country: France



    Quote Originally Posted by spongetaro View Post
    Yes, the Gedrosia makes more than 1/3 of the North European component for the Basque while it makes less than 1/4 of the Northern European component for the Irish. This maybe explain why the Basque don't speak an IE language.


    In this case, Proto Indo European would be the language of the "North European" of the eastern steppe while Basque would be related to the more southward culture of Central Asia (carrying Gedrosia admixture to the Steppe ) of Djebel, Dam Dam Chashma, and Keltermnar.
    I prefer this theory because it explains why Basque is so isolated in Europe (even compared to Iberian and Tartessian in the Iberian Peninsula) and why there is no Basque substratum in Europe.
    I take on very late for these points:
    I repaet (as in other threads) I red a survey that concluded it was 2 substratums in Saami finnish: one I-E satem or nearly satemized (interesting whne we look at the Y-DNA-R1a in Scandinavia), and one akin to a kind of proto-basque... look at the mtDNA-V (with a big drift it is true) among Saami
    sure even if true these does not tell us what role was the Gedrosia's one (if Gedrosia autosomals is not a mirage)
    have a good night rich of historical dreams - Moesan

  3. #53
    Regular Member Achievements:
    1000 Experience Points1 year registered

    Join Date
    14-10-11
    Posts
    379
    Points
    2,483
    Level
    14
    Points: 2,483, Level: 14
    Level completed: 11%, Points required for next Level: 267
    Overall activity: 7.0%


    Ethnic group
    German
    Country: Germany



    Quote Originally Posted by Knovas View Post
    The SNP's available are incredibly low compared to Ötzi or any present day participant. I think it's useful to see the major components, but minor ancestries cannot be represented accurately with the present data. Forget about speculations based on this, it's not the time.
    Well, if I understood correctly, the usual SNP number for analysis of contemporary humans is approx. 166000. Dienekes came up with 4000-6600 useful SNPs by overlapping the full SNP sets with the ancient ones. For finding at least 5% Gedrosian admixture, there are at least 0.05 * 4000 = 200 SNPs available to represent Gedrosian admixture after all. Statistically that should be reliable enough I would expect. But I don't understand why the overlap is so small.

  4. #54
    Regular Member Achievements:
    1000 Experience PointsOverdriveThree Friends1 year registered
    Knovas's Avatar
    Join Date
    14-05-11
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    1,297
    Points
    4,113
    Level
    18
    Points: 4,113, Level: 18
    Level completed: 66%, Points required for next Level: 137
    Overall activity: 11.0%

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    I2a1a*
    MtDNA haplogroup
    K1b1a

    Ethnic group
    Celtiberian / Catalan
    Country: Spain - Catalonia



    I understand the way you think. Noise scores usually appear even checking 166.000 SNP's, so the problem tends to increase if there are only 6.000 available. I don't know more details, but it's well known. Note that Dienekes' only considered the major components, and when someone asked him about minnor ancestries, he did not consider this relevant...well, maybe it's true, but the fact is that we don't know it
    Last edited by Knovas; 11-08-12 at 20:28.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Similar Threads

  1. the West European component in the Dodecad project
    By spongetaro in forum Autosomal Genetics
    Replies: 46
    Last Post: 23-11-12, 15:03
  2. Origin of G2a
    By secherbernard in forum G2a
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 01-11-10, 08:08
  3. Columbus DNA Origin
    By Aristander in forum Y-DNA Haplogroups
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 28-10-10, 23:43
  4. Origin of the Libyans
    By Maciamo in forum Genetic Genealogy & Haplogroups
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 07-07-10, 10:27
  5. The Origin of L21
    By rms2 in forum R1b
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 24-01-10, 20:13

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •