1) Why should the pre-Hittite inhabitants of central Anatolia (who, unlike the Anatolians themselves weren't even Indo-Europeans) in the ca. 20th century BC be related with a tribe of 1st century AD Germania? There's approximately 2000 years and approximately the same amount of kilometers between them.
why not?
2) The name "Chatti" is obviously Germanic, before the first Germanic sound shift (
Grimm's Law), the name would have been something along the lines of *
Kaddi.
what does it mean, if it is obviously Germanic?
what if it is older than existence of Germanic languages?
... which frankly makes even less sense. Because "Chatti" and "Gothones" (both Germanic names, attested from the same time slice ven) are clearly different names. In the 1st century AD, the Chatti and the Goths nearly the same common language. Hence "ch" cannot be the same as "g" if we're talking about the same language.
who is talking about same language in time when both tribes departed from non-IE Hatti?
You believe that there is a continuity of tribal names in ignorance of sound correspondences.
all your arguments are linguistic and based on modern languages...
but don't you think it is possible that some tribal names are older than modern languages...
As I said, you take patterns which are not there and rather haphazardly add Haplogroups to them from patterns you project onto these maps. You seek confirmations for patterns which are not there.
well,perhaps you should try to imagine possible directions of movement of haplogroup spreads when you look at maps...
why would Celtic marker had peak in north Italy that stretches far into mid Italy? Celts never went much further than Po....even in lower Po area only known Celts are Boii and they stayed there only for a short while....too short to leave significant impact on genetics..
there very some Celtic tribes on very north of Italy in Alps area, but with spread of Roman empire they were initially pushed further to north and west.... which correlates with border of L21 area of influence....in fact, Celts are perfectly well described with L21 as dominant...celtic languages survived in areas in which they stayed dominant... otherwise L21 is elevated in areas where they were strong in history... that was never in mid Italy...so why would S28 in mid Italy be Celtic?
and most recent settlers of area (most recent settlers typically leave most impact) were various germanic tribes with Goths being especially numerous in north Italy and a bit less in mid Italy while they did not really settle in south... which maps to what we see in S28
do you really believe that Goths as last settlers of Spain who also ruled over it for centuries left genetic imprint of around 1% or less... that's impossible... those are fierce soldiers, known for being brutal... their genetic impact must be much larger...only explanation is that they carried substantial R1b ...
you try to link y-DNA to modern languages, but you would do better if you try to link mtDNA to languages as woman dominantly influence acceptance of languages and military settlers often do not take woman with them- they take local ones, which is e.g. why Spain hardly has any influence of Germanic languages or Bulgaria of Bulgar language...
man in past did not really speak that much, they would work and fight, so they were carriers of tribal identity who spread it...
it is woman who transfer the language to next generations... if woman are local, next generations will speak their language...
moving tribes carry language only if they bring most of own woman with them... but that does not happen when a tribe moves from e.g. Black sea to e.g. Spain fighting its way through enemy lands all the way... too far away, to risky...too costly...plus there are local woman in which ever country tribe goes...perhaps even more beautiful ones...
if woman would always move with military tribes we would see gross correlation between mtDNa and YDNA clades, but we don't...
it is quite different with tribal names - they are key part of identity of invaders - again look at example of Bulgars... they accepted language of local woman, but they still have their tribal name... Bulgars did conquest, Serbs and Croats settled peacefully after being invited to settle emptied areas... military conquest is typically done without woman involved,,,,,that is why Bulgars lost their language, and Serbs and Croats did not...
if you e.g. move to China and marry a chinese girl that doesnot speak German, your grandchildren would likely not speak German but only Chinese (because German language is pretty useless in China, but in past times also because you as a man would not interact that much with children and teach them to speak...you would be to busy with earning resources for living),
however they would still carry your last name as it is their identity....maybe some chinese linguistic genius would one day in future claim that chinese version of your last name is clearly of Chinese origin, but would you agree?