Seven notices that the author of the tread must check
1)
Sarmatians speak Scythian language, but did not learn it well (Herodotus)
guess the paramaters that gives,
it means their language is mostly the one from mother tribe - Amazones... and that may have been iranic related..
2) Scythian names, like Skillerus can be Germanic Shiller?
etc Roman Thracian names
like Clavdius
Greek Κλαυδιος (υ Not v)
Germ Claudia (u not v)
could it be in Slavic languages Slav ?
Greek Ρωμανου Romanu
Romanian Romanu
Slavic Romanov ( u becomes v)
Notice ceasar-> car = tsar
maybe Scythians were PIE speaking people...
and were later absorbed by Slavs
3) if Σκωλοτοι name that Herodotus use are the scythians could it be the later Sclavini?
maybe
4) modern Germanic are the Hannover western forms of German
could Germanic Baltic Slavic and Albanian origin from a common language?
their grammar and vocabulary show that they had similar past and process, comparing the Greek Sanshqrit etc
5) If Sarmatians were an elite and Slavs existed at the time of Herodotus would herodotus just mention them? at least a small history about them?
maybe under other names,,,
6) many Uralic Turkic people enter Moravia before the known Great Moravia, why the genetical data did not change?
could the same happened with Slavic population at the 'traditional' Historical stories?
those Turkic may have been R1a as well
alternatively, they didnot leave much offshot...
it is not rare to see in Czech or Slovakia somewhat slanted eyes...
7) if Slavic are R1a (z496 I think) why in Greece R1a exists in high mountainous areas and not in Valleys since Slavs took all the best fields?
not all R1a is Slavic,,,,
and south Slavic may have been dominantly I2a-din
*suerb = border people is close to your earlier assumptions that it means just warriors
i remember reading (do not know source) that in Russia serb meant soldier....
interesting with this respect is different meaning of word bojar in slavic countries...
in Serbia it is warrior class... in other Slavs it is wealthy person....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bojar
root word is boj = battle
border people are warriors in war and merchants in peace....in peace they are bridge between different cultures... merchants are wealthy people...
hence Sart in Asia as name for merchants...
*suerb = turn and *uend = turn
can also indicate not just place where to turn (border, (u)end) but also people who are bilingual and of mixed origin and change language when usage of other language is more adventageous...naturally bilingual border people can "turn" to one side, to one of languages and cultures when that becomes adventageous...
hence Siraces (considered by some to origin from Caucasian Serboi) on Black sea as most hellenized of Sarmatians,...they were known as merchants....
hence many Wends(Sorbs) easily becomming Germans in east Germany...(Leibniz is most notable example of German with Sorbian roots)
I can imagine Scordisci being both Celtic and proto-Slavic speakers.... when pushed by Roman empire, they resist for a while and than move to north, to area from Bohemia where they go as Celtic to area of Caarpathians where they go as Slavic...part of them that stays in Serbia is absorbed by roman empire, hence romanized (and giving Vlachs) and in Srem are they fall under Sarmatian Iazyges (two classes exist in their society - lower class called "serfs")
when Celtic language lose its advantage due to Gauls being romanized, they drop Celtic language and become Slavic only....I would note here that west parts of Bohemia where we find toponyms related to Serbs also has increased I2a-din (3 times compared to the rest of Czech republic),,, DAI (De administrando Imperio) places white Serbia in land Boiki which can be mapped only to Bohemia....it states it is also where they originally come from... which makes sense as origin place of I2a-din
there is one big difference between contemporary Serbs and Croats - Serbs easily adapt international words, Croats defend their language by inventing own words for new technological terms.....
Croats do not really fit in oriignally Balkan people...they are too white for Mediterranean people... I would rather relate proto-Croats to Carpii or Sarmatians originally and to R1a (and I2a-din north ) and leave possibility that I2a-Din south (along with I2a din - north) was in Balkan as Illyrians and Scordisci...Nordvedt estimates of age of haplogroups are way too strict...they are never adapted by official science... according to official method age of I2a-Din in Serbia is 9000 year old... ("High levels of Paleolithic Y-chromosome lineages characterize Serbia"-Maria Regueiro, Luis Rivera, Tatjana Damnjanovic, Ljiljana Lukovic, Jelena Milasin, Rene J. Herrera) ..Scordisci also explain why i2a-din south is rare in east Europe east of Danube, but appears in line from Balkan to Denmark...in Slovakia I2a-din is much larger in Vlach settlers from Romania than in native Slovak people...if you look at Carpi on euratlas maps it is notable that they move to west from Black sea to Carpathians, even before Huns enter from east...with arrival of Huns they are likely to go more to west and into Carpatians....hence white (west) Croatia in west Carpatians, more precisely in south Poland and Slovakia....both Serbs and Croats from white Serbia and white Croatia are in DAI said to have been called white there, which I explained with misunderstanding of *uend (border people) with Celtic word *windo = white and by white (west) designation in name of their countries...
Scordisci and Carpi can both fit into Danubian Slavs from Russian primary chronicle that move to north when being pushed by expanding Roman empire..Russian primary chronicle explicitly mention Serbs, Croats and Carantines among those Danubian Slavs,,,,, Carantines could origin from slavicized Carni...
note also that mediating between different cultures and being bilingual could have been a way for I2a people to survive arrival of new people in Europe...
in that respect curious is also that Serbs are only nation that uses both cirillyc and latin alphabets....