Eupedia Forums
Site NavigationEupedia Top > Eupedia Forum & Japan Forum
Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Y-DNA predictors

  1. #1
    Regular Member Achievements:
    1 year registered5000 Experience PointsOverdrive
    Awards:
    User with most referrers
    zanipolo's Avatar
    Join Date
    22-03-11
    Location
    Eastern Australia
    Posts
    1,830
    Points
    8,124
    Level
    26
    Points: 8,124, Level: 26
    Level completed: 96%, Points required for next Level: 26
    Overall activity: 99.9%

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    T1a2b (T-L446)
    MtDNA haplogroup
    H26a1

    Ethnic group
    Venet
    Country: Australia



    Y-DNA predictors

    What I really want to know is if its worthwhile doing tests for less than 37 markers. The reason is , if I present my fdtna test results for only 12 markers and place them into a Ydna predictor it gives me these results
    K2 (T) =>54% N-E.Europe =>18% E3b-M183 =>13% I-M253 =>8% O =>4%

    Granted , ftdna have more accurate results. But lets say I go for a 25 marker, my results are
    N-E.Europe =>55% K2 (T) =>39% E3b-M183 =>3% Q-M242-Group1 =>3%

    If I then go to ......as an example 27 markers, I get
    K2 (T) =>89% N-E.Europe =>5% Fx =>4% ...........this clearly indicated DYS460 and Gata-H4 are very important

    on to 37 markers and its
    K2 (T) =>99%

    My point is that the 25 marker ( and neither is the 12 one) is not conclusivess, yet T Hg is the first in line.

    Since some only do 12 markers, is it enough to indicate which is your HG, are these predictors reliable?

    ..................

    If I use the russian predicator, then this is what I get

    12 markers = N Haplogroup Probability
    1 T1b-L131 99%

    25 markers = N Haplogroup Probability
    1 T1b-L131 100%

    27 markers = N Haplogroup Probability
    1 T1b-L131 100%

    37 markers = N Haplogroup Probability
    1 T1b-L131 100%

    I only become T1b with the 11th marker DYS392 which is 13 , prior to that marker I am either I-M253 or F-M89 in HG type


    lastly ........Is it worthwhile in an upgrade from 37 to 67 markers with my haplotype

  2. #2
    Regular Member Achievements:
    Tagger Second Class250 Experience Points3 months registered

    Join Date
    05-02-13
    Posts
    34
    Points
    330
    Level
    3
    Points: 330, Level: 3
    Level completed: 80%, Points required for next Level: 20
    Overall activity: 12.0%


    Ethnic group
    Greek
    Country: Cyprus



    Not really for what you are trying to get from the data. If you are really interested in your admixture (i.e. % West European, % North European, % West Asian, etc.), the way to go is with an autosomal DNA test. Three options are 23andme, Geno 2.0, and FTDNA's Family Finder.

  3. #3
    Regular Member Achievements:
    1 year registered5000 Experience PointsOverdrive
    Awards:
    User with most referrers
    zanipolo's Avatar
    Join Date
    22-03-11
    Location
    Eastern Australia
    Posts
    1,830
    Points
    8,124
    Level
    26
    Points: 8,124, Level: 26
    Level completed: 96%, Points required for next Level: 26
    Overall activity: 99.9%

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    T1a2b (T-L446)
    MtDNA haplogroup
    H26a1

    Ethnic group
    Venet
    Country: Australia



    Quote Originally Posted by Alexandros View Post
    Not really for what you are trying to get from the data. If you are really interested in your admixture (i.e. % West European, % North European, % West Asian, etc.), the way to go is with an autosomal DNA test. Three options are 23andme, Geno 2.0, and FTDNA's Family Finder.
    old post by me......currently have done all the autosomal ....and awaiting Genbank result in a weeks time
    - FF places me on the french Italian swiss border
    -uni of illinois places me in south tyrol
    - other testers place me in eastern alps


    thanks for reply

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •