lets clear up these errors
i entered this thread on the stupid post#8
- my post #46 should of had @finalise before the ptolemy sentence
- you replied on post#54 INCLUDING my ptolemy sentence which indicates you want to talk about it
- other posts are normal continuation
- That's not where we started, not my problem
- Would you assume otherwise if I didn't have the Albanian flag?
- No, other posts are me explaining things right and you wrong.
zanipolo said:
on christian Arberesh - I already said its the name given by italians on albanians who settled in italy a long time ago. The italians will never ever say they are albanians. They are called christian because they escaped from ottoman rule.
Same system as they will never ever say the cimbri in north Italy are Danish.
The Italians also say there are no Italians before 1860 .......that's the system.
Here's the distinction. Arbëresh are Albanians who left for Italy in the Medieval times, speak an archaic version of Albanian, and
they're called with this name, because this was the medieval name for Albanians.
It doesn't cross religious boundaries. Are Christian Albanians from Albania called
Arbëresh?
zanipolo said:
New albanians are albanesi unless they become italians citizens...then they are Italians.
OK.
zanipolo said:
- what did I not answer ?
I asked you if Albanians have different names for each other based on religion,
what are Jewish Albanians called? You compared Albanians to Gentili, meaning you treated Albanians as an ethnoreligious society. Well, let's continue with the same logic.
What's the name for Jewish Albanians?
zanipolo said:
On comments about gypies....they are a summary on Fenni's 2010 papers.
There was never a Fenni who studied Gypsies in Albania. It was
Ferri. It wasn't a typo, because you kept using that name. You were referring to a fake study. And those weren't his results. These were his results:
http://bit.ly/155ZS4q Guess what? There's a group of people
in the Balkans the same as another one, but wants to be distinct, so calls themselves by another name. That's news to you? What about calling them Albanians in the first place? They're called
Romani here:
www.yhrd.org/YC164 . You called them Albanians, because
you liked the results. That's what it means to be neutral, huh? And just google "Albanian dialects", do you see Jevg and Gabel anywhere? Or do you want me to do that too?
http://bit.ly/XxIK0j
zanipolo said:
The only medieval thing I said was about a Bulgarian map in the 11th century.
Half of conversation we had was about the medieval Albanians. The other half was me saying Albanians are proven they're NOT different from other Europeans/have common European origins, even though the language is different. Was I talking to a wall?
zanipolo said:
Now, If you want to talk about ancient writers for albanians...let me know
Sure, I got curious about Ptolemy and started searching for him. The part he said about Albanopolis/Albanoi? It was cited by so many people, one after the other;
they were never questioned. Names like Jovan Cvijic, Alexandru Madegaru, Martin Gordon, William Smith, Richard Talbert etc. before Albanians using it. They might be thousands to have used that part as a citation. Go question them, not me. What did I say to get bullied so much?
----------------------------------
Next comment by zanipolo:
1) In that book it was referring to Normans.
2) Other possible etymologies are *albho- white, *alb- hill, and it's a pretty commonly used name.
3) What the context of the Latin text? Are they talking about two different people? First part describes some people of the night called Albanians, the other says Dneiper Sarmatians. Were they preparing for a battle? At night?
4) I see, Caucasus Iberia and Albania, so of course it's different people. Albania is an exonym in Caucasus.
-------------------------------------------
@Yetos Greek is not an mystery to anyone, so it really doesn't need defending. It's not a case of agreeing quietly, it's a case of quietly moving on to the next post.