Some years ago I was researching how blood's groups are presented in diffrent populations.
One specific group is specialy characteristic for Europe. It is RH negative. I was always curious
are some suppositions, theories or studies which link together this blood group with some
ancient populations. Most hight density of this group exists among Basks, but they are to
small and to inbred population that they can proof anything (the same situation has place
with majority hg among them, wich is deffinitly not oruginal, if we take the postulated origin
of that population wich should be euskara-speaking pre-indo-european). So, my question is,
is there any knowing proof that alow link these blood group with any ancient population?
Especially, it would be interesting, in which (as I called) haplo-nation this gene had origin.
Personaly I think that this should have place in those population which had more recessive
genes like recessive genes of skin, hair, eyes etc. Why? Becouse they both are especially
appear in higher concentration in the same area, in Europe.
One specific group is specialy characteristic for Europe. It is RH negative. I was always curious
are some suppositions, theories or studies which link together this blood group with some
ancient populations. Most hight density of this group exists among Basks, but they are to
small and to inbred population that they can proof anything (the same situation has place
with majority hg among them, wich is deffinitly not oruginal, if we take the postulated origin
of that population wich should be euskara-speaking pre-indo-european). So, my question is,
is there any knowing proof that alow link these blood group with any ancient population?
Especially, it would be interesting, in which (as I called) haplo-nation this gene had origin.
Personaly I think that this should have place in those population which had more recessive
genes like recessive genes of skin, hair, eyes etc. Why? Becouse they both are especially
appear in higher concentration in the same area, in Europe.