Why do you think they are all different?

[johen]

The reconstructed face of man found 1.5 miles from Stonehenge around BC 3,400: looks modern

“a Neolithic woman (3343 – 3020 BC) from a tomb in Ballynahatty near Belfast. Her genes tell us she had black hair and brown eyes.
A Neolithic woman from a megalithic burial possessed a genome of predominantly Near Eastern origin. She had some hunter-gatherer ancestry "

http://www.sci-news.com/otherscience...ime-03539.html

Around 332-37 BCE a composite facial reconstruction of female Jews in ancient Israel
http://failedmessiah.typepad.com/fai...ish-faces.html

Questions:
1. at close area around 3,300 BC, the irish and the british looks different.
2. the time gap between irish with predominant gene of Near East and the female jew is 3,000 years. However, the latter one looks recessive.

 

[laetoli]

Questions:
1. at close area around 3,300 BC, the irish and the british looks different.
2. the time gap between irish with predominant gene of Near East and the female jew is 3,000 years. However, the latter one looks recessive.

I'm not at all sure that they all look so different but variation within populations is normal - it's the stuff of natural selection. Anyway, it's a long way from Israel to Ireland. (The women look like they're cast in bronze but they're not bronze age )

 

[rosalynhill]

Amazing artist.