Fantasy and conspiracy about white pyramid

[johen]

http://sino-platonic.org/complete/spp007_old_chinese.pdf

Middle Chinese language (3c-13c) had a linguistic similarity with Tai-Kadal people and Austroasatic people and Hmong-mien.
And the above research metioned also, which means the Chinese tonal language appeared since 3century.

Unknown to Old Chinese, the existence of tonal accents was for the first time mentioned in the 5th century by Shen Yiieh (441-513).
In Middle Chinese (Mch.) there were four tone categories: A Ping-sheng , a level tone (which developed into Mandarin tone 1 or 2) . B Shang-sheng k , a rising tone (Mandarin tone 3) . C Ch'ii-sheng , a vanishing, i.e. falling tone (Mandarin tone 4) . D Ju-sheng A , an entering tone with a staccato effect, the word being abruptly stopped by a final consonant -p, -t, -k. (In Early Mandarin the words of this tone lost their final consonant and were distributed among the tones 2, 3 and 4, respectively according to the phonation of initials)

And it was proved by all Han chinese genetic admixture in the map. However, there is another gene still left in the map: Altaic

How to explain the Altaic factor in Chinese people?

Sergei discovered that OCH(old Chinese) have an interesting stratum of Altaic borrowings which share three common features: "1. The Old Chinese words are usually attested at least starting with Early Zhou (only a few of them are attested later than 6th century B.C.). 2. For none of these words have any Sino-Tibetan parallels been proposed. 3. On the Altaic side, the words are well represented, particularly, in the east (Korean, Japanese and Tungus-Manchu)"[9]. Discussing the impact of this discovery, Sergei mentioned to me that the Neolithic Yangshao culture of the Huang He valley can be associated with those Altaic speakers. The contacts (not peaceful) began when the speakers of OCH reached the Huang He valley and met the local Altaic population.

He said,
1. OCH was not similar to sino-tibetan, which modern chinese language belongs to. The genetic admixture of map also shows non sino-tibetan(violet color) in Han chines.
2. The yangshao was speaking Altaic, which is also proved to be Hg N (how did he know that!!!!)

==> Thus, shang and Zhou people might be nomad Q speaking Altaic being similar to R language. B/C Q was living in Altai area, being genetically close to R.

 

[johen]

Simply Shangs and Zhous could be Indoeuropeans, or under IE influence.
Exept of horse burial they change whole chinese social structure from
matrilineal to patrilineal, changed main god for IE like and what is most
important here, Old Chinese language was (and probably still is) full of
IE borrowings. From somewhere it had to be taken, they did develope
it not on their own, to many stuff. So, since XVII century BC China had
to be under Indoeuropean infuence if not under IE direct rule.

But Finchurian neolithic has nothing to do with that.

The Rise of Agricultural Civilization in China:The Disparity between Archeological Discovery andthe Documentary Record and Its ExplanationbyZhou JixuCenter for East Asian Studies, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PennsylvaniaChinese Department, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu, Sichuan

Unlike the Yangshao and Hemudu people, who came from southern China, the Huang Di nation came from west of China, from the western part of the Eurasian continent. They conquered the native people of the Yellow River and the Yangtze River, who possessed a developed agricultural culture. By combining their own imported cultural factors with those of the native culture, the Huang Di people gradually developed a splendid new civilization in the Xia, Shang, and Zhou dynasties. They superseded the original native people to take the leading role on the stage of Chinese history. That the Huang Di nation was a branch of the archaic Indo-European people is one of the most remarkable facts thus far known to human history. But a large number of Indo-European words in Old Chinese language clearly attest to this fact. The relics left by the Huang Di people are related to the Longshan Culture in the archaeological chronicle, and the civilization of the Xia, Shang, Zhou, and Qin秦 dynasties were its successors.27 Evidence for this claim comes from two sources: the first uses the evidence of ancient documents to show that the Zhou people, and thus the Yellow Emperor’s nation, were originally a nomadic people, and the second is to reveal that there were a large number of Indo-European words in the Zhou language, using the evidence of historical linguistics. The third is the similarity in religion between the Huang Di people and Proto-Indo-European. As to the last point, please refer to the author’s paper “Old Chinese ‘帝*tees’ and Proto-Indo-European ‘*deus’: Similarity in Religious Ideas and a Common Source in Linguistics” (Zhou 2005).