Which one is the best (Dodecad, Eurogenes, Harappaworld)?

BakodiP

Regular Member
Messages
97
Reaction score
7
Points
0
Location
Győr, Hungary
Ethnic group
Hungarian
Y-DNA haplogroup
J2b*
mtDNA haplogroup
U5b2b1b
I run all these tests through GedMatch, and my question is which of the above mentioned is the most accurate? And of course which verison? I mean K9, K12b, K36 etc. (I know that the number stands for the different population samples.)
 
So far to me the most accurate seems to be the Eutest by Eurogenes.
 
I run all these tests through GedMatch, and my question is which of the above mentioned is the most accurate? And of course which verison? I mean K9, K12b, K36 etc. (I know that the number stands for the different population samples.)

dodecad seems more bias on central and southern europe.
eugogenes is bias on eastern europe
Harraworld is best for middleeast , anatolia, balkans

these are my opinions

MDLP is more baltic and seems good for northern europeans
 
In my opinion the Dodecad tests are the best, Eutest is pretty good to but since im mixed euro (Jewish, NE) these all give different oracles depending on wich one i take. What i did was take all the test on gedmatch and than average what i got from each test.
 
I find EUtest to be the most accurate, although many of Dodecad's ones are pretty good too.
 
from Dedecad I find Globe13, K12b and K10a the most accurate.
 
Thank's for the answers guys! For me Dodecad K12b was the best so far! (y)
 
I find EUtest to be the most accurate, although many of Dodecad's ones are pretty good too.
I think that there is a problem on identification as this test !
icon9.png


Except that coming from the family of the Basque country and as others I do not understand the German why in Basque genetics.



1 ATLANTI
33.52
2NORTH-CENTRAL_EURO24.77
3WEST_MED18.30
4EAST_EURO7.48
5SOUTH_BALTIC6.99
6EAST_MED6.96
7WEST_ASIAN1.98
1 English + French_Basque + French_Basque + West_&_Central_German @ 3.646
3 English + French_Basque + French_Basque + NL @ 3.704
4 DK + English + French_Basque + French_Basque @ 3.818
5 DK + French_Basque + French_Basque + West_&_Central_German @ 4.037
6 French_Basque + French_Basque + NL + NL @ 4.048
7 French_Basque + French_Basque + NL + West_&_Central_German @ 4.054.......etc
..................12 French_Basque + French_Basque + West_&_Central_German + West_&_Central_German @ 4.133
etc..................20 Cornish + French_Basque + French_Basque + West_&_Central_German @ 4.342
 
I think that there is a problem on identification as this test !
icon9.png


Except that coming from the family of the Basque country and as others I do not understand the German why in Basque genetics.



1 ATLANTI33.52
2NORTH-CENTRAL_EURO24.77
3WEST_MED18.30
4EAST_EURO7.48
5SOUTH_BALTIC6.99
6EAST_MED6.96
7WEST_ASIAN1.98
1 English + French_Basque + French_Basque + West_&_Central_German @ 3.646
3 English + French_Basque + French_Basque + NL @ 3.704
4 DK + English + French_Basque + French_Basque @ 3.818
5 DK + French_Basque + French_Basque + West_&_Central_German @ 4.037
6 French_Basque + French_Basque + NL + NL @ 4.048
7 French_Basque + French_Basque + NL + West_&_Central_German @ 4.054.......etc
..................12 French_Basque + French_Basque + West_&_Central_German + West_&_Central_German @ 4.133
etc..................20 Cornish + French_Basque + French_Basque + West_&_Central_German @ 4.342

Yeah that's odd, i guess it's just saying you are more to the northeast than most other Basque, for some reason? It's probably the most accurate for my family overall.
 
and also I could understand if I'm the only one from the Basque blood to find this result but it is not the fact it seems.
I introduce a Basque ph?notype, but anything particularly Nordic otherwise I resemble French or Spanish of the north. (I am dark brown predominantly with eyes green), I think that he is not used the good reference of Basque (my family is originally for Guipuscoa and northwest party of Navarre).

For you Eurogenes Eutest is it correspondent to reality?


I resemble the man, on this video, a lot, which does not sing, with the brown jacket and the red tricot which they see at the height behind the lantern.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6c94fIYc3Gk
 
Last edited:
and also I could understand if I'm the only one from the Basque blood to find this result but it is not the fact it seems.
I introduce a Basque ph?notype, but anything particularly Nordic otherwise I resemble French or Spanish of the north. (I am dark brown predominantly with eyes green), I think that he is not used the good reference of Basque (my family is originally for Guipuscoa and northwest party of Navarre).

For you Eurogenes Eutest is it correspondent to reality?


I resemble the man, on this video, a lot, which does not sing, with the brown jacket and the red tricot which they see at the height behind the lantern.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6c94fIYc3Gk
with all the programs of counting I tried; but for me I find almost the same partial error. I think that there is an error of valuation in the source in these programs of count. He can be founded on the reference of fundamental samples
 
To be honest with you, I'm wondering about the same thing myself, none of them seem to be accurate for I have an overwhelming amount of Mediteranian on Eurogenes yet that is the closest to accurate considering Romans Invaded England. Here are my stats genetic wise. I managed to narrow it down to K9K10 and K36 Standard
99.6% European


Northern European

30.6% British & Irish

3.3% French & German

>0.1% Finnish

47.5% Nonspecific Northern European

0.9% Eastern European

17.2% Nonspecific European

0.3% Sub-Saharan African

0.3% West African

0.1% Unassigned Oral History : 13/32 British, 5/32 Irish, 3/32 Welsh, 5/32 Prussian, 1/8 MacDonald Tribe, 1/16 French with an Ashkenazi Jewish Minority Maybe I'm more Roman than the average Northern European Predominate. :/ Yet again, both of my haplogroups originate in the Mediteranian
 
Last edited:
Eurogenes has been the best for me so far. Dodecad hasn't updated since 2012 and non-Eurogenes calculators suffer from the "calculator effet" which results in project participants' results (including reference populations which is the important thing regarding Oracle accuracy) being so different as to be uncomparable from non-participants testing in Gedmatch or DIYDodecad.

Eurogenes averts this by taking their population averages from individuals from scientific samples that were not part of the initial admixture runs.
 
Eurogenes has been the best for me so far. Dodecad hasn't updated since 2012 and non-Eurogenes calculators suffer from the "calculator effet" which results in project participants' results (including reference populations which is the important thing regarding Oracle accuracy) being so different as to be uncomparable from non-participants testing in Gedmatch or DIYDodecad.

Eurogenes averts this by taking their population averages from individuals from scientific samples that were not part of the initial admixture runs.

Are there any West African Tribes Known to have Dna Native to the Horn of Africa?
 
Are there any West African Tribes Known to have Dna Native to the Horn of Africa?

As far as I know probably not to a distinguishable extent, assuming we're talking about autosomal DNA. If we count uniparental markers like Y-DNA it's another story.
 
Weird, 23andme detected West African AC Dna while Eurogene said I was West African negative but instead my African Dna origionated in the Horn of Africa :/
 
So far to me the most accurate seems to be the Eutest by Eurogenes.
Eurogenes in general, at least for people with european ancestry. Dodecad has some weaknesses. I run harappa on GEDmatch, but I think it's obviously much more accurate for people with indian and central asian ancestry.
 

This thread has been viewed 38259 times.

Back
Top