Echetlaeus
Hero of Marathon
As this forum is full of Americans and Canadians, I would like to have an answer about this horrible phenomenon.
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Because they were near exterminated by the Anglos, same happened in Australia or New Zeland with the natives, it's the Anglo mentality of segregating. See the difference with the SPanish or French colonizations, the indigienous have been more respected, and not pushed or elminiated. Just look at the population of Latin America, most people have indian blood (mestizos).
As this forum is full of Americans and Canadians, I would like to have an answer about this horrible phenomenon.
Does Aberdeen's answer satisfies your "curiosity"?As this forum is full of Americans and Canadians, I would like to have an answer about this horrible phenomenon.
Does Aberdeen's answer satisfies your "curiosity"?
Besides you using word camps was intentional to suggest similarities to "concentration camps". There are not camps, these are "reservation lands".
Now tell me why do you think the reservation lands are terrible tragedy. Reservation lands are owned by Natives with rights to build anything, explore natural resources and make money, give them rights to hunt with no restrictions, and living there you don't need to pay income taxes as citizen of Canada? They have very wide autonomy, and as a resident of reservation you will get 20,000 in government subsidies a year, in housing, roads, etc., and of course you can leave reservation any time you want without border security or customs. They are not locked in these reserves, they can travel and work anywhere in Canada, and anytime they want they can go back on reserve and enjoy these special privileges no other citizen of Canada can.
So again, why being a resident of reservation land is such a terrible thing in your eyes?
They are not locked in reservation camps, as your title suggest but instead try thinking of reservation as land reserved for Natives only.
Are you able to comprehend today what I wrote? They are free to live wherever they want! To make it simple for you, here is an example: If you own a house in New York, it doesn't mean that people in Los Angeles don't what you "at your feet"!It is a terrible tragedy because you don't want them around your feet,
Well, it had to be by force because they didn't wanted to get killed voluntarily. Anything more intelligent you can write?that's why, but instead you gave them land to guild the pill of taking their lands and killing their people by force.
Yes to the point of creating super citizens of more privileges and rights than me or Aberdeen have, the ordinary citizens. I hope you got the picture now of modern meaning of being on reservation land.You have segregated them way to bad.
Of course, as the white population increased, they still didn't want to let Native people integrate, so the Natives stayed on the reservations...
Another of your misconceptions. I never had Anglo-Saxon education.I cannot deal with LeBrok anymore. He seems to be a lost case of the Anglo-Saxon educational system.
Another of your misconceptions. I never had Anglo-Saxon education.
Before you criticize someone else's education please work on yours. Your lack of knowledge about Indian "Camps" or WW2 (Germans attacked Russia in Winter), and on many other topics is in shambles. These days knowledge is at your fingertip, you fail or are too lazy to find it.
The difference is that the Spanish and Portuguese enslaved those Native people they didn't massacre, instead of putting them on reservations. Native people, to this day, are often horribly abused by the white and mestizo people in some South American and Central American countries.
So you had to say it back, lol. How mature.You said the same thing about my education before ("a lost case of the Greek educational system").
And yet you're to amaze us with your knowledge, never mind critical thinking or being creative.I reckon that my education is superior than yours, except if you have a PhD.
We know what your intentions are, like in every thread you start and from day one you showed up here. Warmongering efforts to use your warrior nature, so useless in time of peace.I never mentioned "Camps" the way you had in mind. Camp does not mean necessarily the Nazi style camps.Of course I have read what these camps are, but I want the opinions of people leaving there, to see what their mentality about those things is like.
Are you criticizing or praising me, I'm not sure? lolBut "LeBrok" has to be that way. A person whose family [probably] has suffered from communism, and now in the New World tries to be a super liberal and supporter of globalization, hence the 'citizen of the world'.
What does that mean? Is this a Greek saying?So put your tongue in your mind prior to speaking.
I'm tolerant to tolerant people. Intolerant individuals don't deserve tolerance of others, otherwise they are abused by intolerance.You always have the tendency to 'ruin' certain threads that you do not like. I advise you to be more tolerant to the other opinion. The dictatorship of the third kind ain't that good.
Yes to the point of creating super citizens of more privileges and rights than me or Aberdeen have, the ordinary citizens. I hope you got the picture now of modern meaning of being on reservation land.
Actually this is another incorrect thing you said. Here is a simple definition:This saying of yours ain't politically correct. Restate.
I vindicated them to higher status, right? Be kind and try to explain in what way I offended our Natives? For your information formally our Canadian Natives call themselves "First Nation". This indicates a distinction above other peoples of Canada, and it is also mirrored in their rights and privileges.[h=2]politically correct[/h] adjective: agreeing with the idea that people should be careful to not use language or behave in a way that could offend a particular group of people
I said only about peculiar Spartan situation not the whole Greece. Secondly, if you want to know more start the thread about this.Homosexuality in Ancient Greece may have been the case (we do not know for sure, do you? And if yes, how?), but until a certain age. Recall, the same was true in the Roman Empire as well.
All Spartans had kids, for it was a duty to society (actually this was the case for the whole Greece). They had to follow the laws of Lycurgus. Someone would have been mocked by the society should he had continued these practices afterwards.
I suggest you 'lift' a little bit more and then talk again.
Lol, what a tricky question, how about this:How do you know that I am intolerant?
And we know all your threads radiating love and tolerance to all your neighbors.I am criticizing you. Liberals tend to be very annoying sometimes.
It comes handy to control intolerance and abuse.Don't you understand that this person is thyself. You are the one who mocks all others with different opinion than yours. You are the one who uses his absolute power in this forum.
Then listen more, talk less and avoid having strong opinions if you don't know much about a subject. How difficult is this?Reminder: I am not historian, nor anthropologist, like most people here are. I just study history for fun.
This thread has been viewed 36972 times.