PDA

View Full Version : Aberdeen, bring it on!!!!!!



Krefter14
05-12-14, 18:41
Refer back to this thread (http://www.eupedia.com/forum/threads/30675-Can-someone-have-high-IQ-without-having-at-least-some-Asperger-traits) where you made false assumptions about me. I want to see you try to beat me with logic. In that thread you used emotion and agenda, and even though logic was on my side you deceived yourself to think some how you were in the right.

You have no right to act righteous in that situation and treat me like I'm a bigoted, idiotic, nuisance. If you were the more mature person in this situation, you would admit your fault. But time and time again you've proven to me you're child in a man's body.

If you're only reason to be upset at me is you miss interpreted my posts, and that I criticized Obama. Which was after you had a long speech praising Obama and made assumptions about my political believes, and so I felt I had to tell you my political believes which you miss interpreted.

I made no insult towards Barak Obama. What can't you understand about that? You miss interpreted me, end of story.

Then you claimed I sent the thread off topic? You're the one who went off topic!!

I was making the simple statement that Obama, Hitler, and Mussolini appear to have traits associated with intelligent people(post (http://www.eupedia.com/forum/threads/30675-Can-someone-have-high-IQ-without-having-at-least-some-Asperger-traits?p=445418&viewfull=1#post445418)). That was totally on subject. I never said Obama was evil in a similar way. You assumed I did, which is bad reasoning and profiling.

You took the thread off subject by miss interpreting me, began debating politics and made incorrect assumptions about my political believes.(post (http://www.eupedia.com/forum/threads/30675-Can-someone-have-high-IQ-without-having-at-least-some-Asperger-traits?p=445422&viewfull=1#post445422))

I then corrected you, claimed I had little opinion on Obama and Bush, then said the only issue I understand in America is a social one and described how I think Obama doesn't deal with it correctly.(post (http://www.eupedia.com/forum/threads/30675-Can-someone-have-high-IQ-without-having-at-least-some-Asperger-traits?p=445423&viewfull=1#post445423))

I was un-abrasive in that comment and I wanted the discussion to end there, but of course you wrongfully claimed I was a liar and raciest(post (http://www.eupedia.com/forum/threads/30675-Can-someone-have-high-IQ-without-having-at-least-some-Asperger-traits?p=445430&viewfull=1#post445430)).

Here's a chunk from post #9, where you wrongfully claimed I'm a raciest.


And you may disapprove of civil rights and the concept of racial equality, but few people on this forum would agree with you on that issue. But please don't derail this interesting topic

Where in that thread was I raciest? Once again you profiled me incorrectly.

Krefter14
05-12-14, 18:42
If you can't handle this truth, because I'm a little abrasive then you have a lot of growing up to do. Look outside your own esteem and think logically. The facts are you miss interpreted me and lead the thread off subject

Sarcastic and witty insults, ignoring the obvious truth, trying to get on my nerves, and trying to appear to be the reasonable civilized person won't win the argument for you. BTW, I know that's your favorite strategy.

I'm abrasive because I'm angry and because I was polite at first(post (http://www.eupedia.com/forum/threads/30675-Can-someone-have-high-IQ-without-having-at-least-some-Asperger-traits)) but you didn't listen.

hope
05-12-14, 19:28
Firehaired, why did you not just answer under your own user name?

Krefter14
05-12-14, 19:40
Firehaired, why did you not just answer under your own user name?

Because Aberdeen decided to ignore me. He's unable to view my comments. If you read the thread you'll see he claims he did that.

Melancon
07-12-14, 12:10
Refer back to this thread (http://www.eupedia.com/forum/threads/30675-Can-someone-have-high-IQ-without-having-at-least-some-Asperger-traits) where you made false assumptions about me. I want to see you try to beat me with logic. In that thread you used emotion and agenda, and even though logic was on my side you deceived yourself to think some how you were in the right.

You have no right to act righteous in that situation and treat me like I'm a bigoted, idiotic, nuisance. If you were the more mature person in this situation, you would admit your fault. But time and time again you've proven to me you're child in a man's body.

If you're only reason to be upset at me is you miss interpreted my posts, and that I criticized Obama. Which was after you had a long speech praising Obama and made assumptions about my political believes, and so I felt I had to tell you my political believes which you miss interpreted.

I made no insult towards Barak Obama. What can't you understand about that? You miss interpreted me, end of story.

Then you claimed I sent the thread off topic? You're the one who went off topic!!

I was making the simple statement that Obama, Hitler, and Mussolini appear to have traits associated with intelligent people(post (http://www.eupedia.com/forum/threads/30675-Can-someone-have-high-IQ-without-having-at-least-some-Asperger-traits?p=445418&viewfull=1#post445418)). That was totally on subject. I never said Obama was evil in a similar way. You assumed I did, which is bad reasoning and profiling.

You took the thread off subject by miss interpreting me, began debating politics and made incorrect assumptions about my political believes.(post (http://www.eupedia.com/forum/threads/30675-Can-someone-have-high-IQ-without-having-at-least-some-Asperger-traits?p=445422&viewfull=1#post445422))

I then corrected you, claimed I had little opinion on Obama and Bush, then said the only issue I understand in America is a social one and described how I think Obama doesn't deal with it correctly.(post (http://www.eupedia.com/forum/threads/30675-Can-someone-have-high-IQ-without-having-at-least-some-Asperger-traits?p=445423&viewfull=1#post445423))

I was un-abrasive in that comment and I wanted the discussion to end there, but of course you wrongfully claimed I was a liar and raciest(post (http://www.eupedia.com/forum/threads/30675-Can-someone-have-high-IQ-without-having-at-least-some-Asperger-traits?p=445430&viewfull=1#post445430)).

Here's a chunk from post #9, where you wrongfully claimed I'm a raciest.



Where in that thread was I raciest? Once again you profiled me incorrectly.I don't like him either; mainly because of something personal to me. His analysis on certain issues often seems outlandish and ill-informed. Of course Aberdeen will probably vote my comment down like usual because he hates people who disagree with him for some odd reason. I debated to him with respect and reason but managed to rake in a few infractions with that guy for some reason; and I still cannot quite understand what I did wrong to him..

(The people involved in the thread where I got infractions were passive-aggressively attacking me; even the Moderators. They did not consider the facts I presented, accused me of trying to insult or provoke people, and simply made up their own reality.)

This post might get locked. But I am just letting people know what I think; this isn't the first time Aberdeen has made baseless assumptions and accusations against someone else.

sparkey
07-12-14, 12:37
This post might get locked.

Yup, locked. Let's have threads stick to topics instead of picking fights with a particular user.