Difficult to be too affirmative as everytime: pictures can abuse us according to the angles chozen (one has two different feelings when pictures are taken from top to bottom or the reverse, by instance, because of the false proportions induced by the lence)
And modern generations are a bit different from ancirent ones.
concerning bones I would say the face is rather of a 'mediterranean' type (elongated oval with rather weak inferior maxillar, long external nose; the skull seems dolichocephalic or subdolichocephalic; the frontal could check smooth 'mediterranean' forms too; the 'nordic' face are long, but the inferior jaw is a bit heavier, and gonials of the jaw are more marked. The external parts of the face shows something not 'mediterranean': the lips are not typically 'mediterranean' for I think - I don't see too neatly the eyes form, but they seem settled far enough from the nose. So I would say dominantly 'mediterranean' in a broad sense spite lacking typical traits as very dark pigmentation - if I'm not mistaken by the pictures, and possible in Southern Europe and even farther (France, G-B, ...). Nothing evocating Albanese or typical West Balkanic people. I saw also this shape of face among some Finland Finns, spite it could be surprising! Sorry, it's so unsteady ground, I cannot be more precise. Only very typical types can be "lodged" easily enough in their country of origin, because Europeans are in the most of the countries the product of the same mixtures, varying only in proportions, so at the individual level a lot of intermediary types can pass in a lot of places.
without guarantee of any government!