Angela
Elite member
- Messages
- 21,823
- Reaction score
- 12,329
- Points
- 113
- Ethnic group
- Italian
I post this merely for fun. I don't put much credence in these things.
http://www.archaeology.org/news/4801-160830-mummy-skull-reconstruction
"Live Science reports that a team of researchers, including an imaging specialist, a forensic Egyptologist, and a sculptor, reconstructed the face of an Egyptian mummy whose head was discovered in the collections of the University of Melbourne. The wrappings and style of embalming suggest that the person lived at least 2,000 years ago. A computed tomography (CT) scan of the embalmed head revealed that the mummy’s skull was intact, and that the individual suffered from two tooth abscesses. The scans also allowed the scientists to measure the skull. Its size suggests it belonged to a woman who was probably not more than 25 years old when she died. “We noticed that the top of her skull is very thin. It is extremely porous,” added biological anthropologist Varsha Pilbrow of the University of Melbourne. This condition may have been brought on by malaria or a flatworm infection. The researchers think the mummy’s head came to the university in the early twentieth century among the collections of archaeologist Frederic Wood Jones. To read about a recently discovered tomb containing a mummy, go to "Tomb of the Chantress.""
Tut also suffered from a very bad malarial infection. It was ubiquitous. Still was up until a few decades ago. My father got it from working in North Africa. In his fifties he would still occasionally get an attack.
This is another reconstruction of a female mummy's face:
http://www.japantimes.co.jp/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/f-mummies-a-20150915.jpg
This is part of the reason I don't trust them...
A reconstruction of Cleopatra:
Contemporary representations of Cleopatra, who was, I would point out, 100% Greek in terms of genetics.
The bones are roughly similar, but the nose, and, of course, the pigmentation, are totally off.
http://www.archaeology.org/news/4801-160830-mummy-skull-reconstruction
"Live Science reports that a team of researchers, including an imaging specialist, a forensic Egyptologist, and a sculptor, reconstructed the face of an Egyptian mummy whose head was discovered in the collections of the University of Melbourne. The wrappings and style of embalming suggest that the person lived at least 2,000 years ago. A computed tomography (CT) scan of the embalmed head revealed that the mummy’s skull was intact, and that the individual suffered from two tooth abscesses. The scans also allowed the scientists to measure the skull. Its size suggests it belonged to a woman who was probably not more than 25 years old when she died. “We noticed that the top of her skull is very thin. It is extremely porous,” added biological anthropologist Varsha Pilbrow of the University of Melbourne. This condition may have been brought on by malaria or a flatworm infection. The researchers think the mummy’s head came to the university in the early twentieth century among the collections of archaeologist Frederic Wood Jones. To read about a recently discovered tomb containing a mummy, go to "Tomb of the Chantress.""
Tut also suffered from a very bad malarial infection. It was ubiquitous. Still was up until a few decades ago. My father got it from working in North Africa. In his fifties he would still occasionally get an attack.
This is another reconstruction of a female mummy's face:
http://www.japantimes.co.jp/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/f-mummies-a-20150915.jpg
This is part of the reason I don't trust them...
A reconstruction of Cleopatra:
Contemporary representations of Cleopatra, who was, I would point out, 100% Greek in terms of genetics.
The bones are roughly similar, but the nose, and, of course, the pigmentation, are totally off.