MOESAN
Elite member
- Messages
- 5,888
- Reaction score
- 1,294
- Points
- 113
- Location
- Brittany
- Ethnic group
- more celtic
- Y-DNA haplogroup
- R1b - L21/S145*
- mtDNA haplogroup
- H3c
A metric survey of an American searcher Lauren brittany JONES (easy to google) about 5 periods in diverse places of England shows differences:
[FONT=ff4, Times New Roman, Times, serif]
ACraniometric Analysis of English Skeletal Samples:Change andContinuity between the Iron Age and Post-Medieval time periods (400BCE-1850 CE). (Under the direction of Dr. D. Troy Case and Dr. Ann H.Ross)[/FONT]
studied: Iron-Age, Romano-Britton, Anglo-Saxon, Middle-Age, last Middle-Age;
short:
- more dolichocrane, closer between them: IA and AS
- more brachy, farthest from all: MA
- more central: RB
some adaptative (+ genetic): nose height): the authors makes relations with climate here
She says Normans had an heavier input that believed before but pounders it saying that the urban sites could bias the results in this very matter (rulers friends denser in towns);
[FONT=ff1, Times New Roman, Times, serif]VII.CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS[/FONT]
[FONT=Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif][FONT=ff4, Times New Roman, Times, serif]7.1Conclusions :The results from this study reject the hypothesis thatthere are no significantcraniometric differences between andamong English samples of Iron Age, Romano-British,Anglo-Saxon,medieval, and post-medieval time periods. Instead, data from thisstudy indicate that all five time periods are characterized bysignificantly different craniometric[/FONT] [FONT=ff4, Times New Roman, Times, serif]patterns.The most similar samples are the Iron Age and Anglo-Saxon, whichillustrate a relatively high degree of cranial continuity despitea lack of temporal continuity. The medieval period is the mostdisparate, which signifies a significant shift in geneticand environmental influences on the sample. The influx of the Frenchand other continental groups beginning with the Norman invasion in the11th century is likely the origin of this variation. Centuries ofextreme cold and subsequent illnesses would have also affectedthe[/FONT] [FONT=ff4, Times New Roman, Times, serif]populationsof medieval England, which are mirrored in cranio facial traits. Thesample from the post-medieval period is the most similar to theRomano-British and medieval groups, signifying a great amount ofheterogeneity in the populace. The outcomes of this studyareable to answer the research questions posed at the beginningof analysis. The Norman Conquest did bring widespread craniometricchange to England, and much of the variation in modern Englishpopulations is related to the Romano-British and medievalpopulations.[/FONT][/FONT]
She evocates the case of the possibe opposition country/towns for Normans and followers but does not concerning the possible biases for IA and AS (elites?)
[FONT=ff4, Times New Roman, Times, serif]
ACraniometric Analysis of English Skeletal Samples:Change andContinuity between the Iron Age and Post-Medieval time periods (400BCE-1850 CE). (Under the direction of Dr. D. Troy Case and Dr. Ann H.Ross)[/FONT]
studied: Iron-Age, Romano-Britton, Anglo-Saxon, Middle-Age, last Middle-Age;
short:
- more dolichocrane, closer between them: IA and AS
- more brachy, farthest from all: MA
- more central: RB
some adaptative (+ genetic): nose height): the authors makes relations with climate here
She says Normans had an heavier input that believed before but pounders it saying that the urban sites could bias the results in this very matter (rulers friends denser in towns);
[FONT=ff1, Times New Roman, Times, serif]VII.CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS[/FONT]
[FONT=Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif][FONT=ff4, Times New Roman, Times, serif]7.1Conclusions :The results from this study reject the hypothesis thatthere are no significantcraniometric differences between andamong English samples of Iron Age, Romano-British,Anglo-Saxon,medieval, and post-medieval time periods. Instead, data from thisstudy indicate that all five time periods are characterized bysignificantly different craniometric[/FONT] [FONT=ff4, Times New Roman, Times, serif]patterns.The most similar samples are the Iron Age and Anglo-Saxon, whichillustrate a relatively high degree of cranial continuity despitea lack of temporal continuity. The medieval period is the mostdisparate, which signifies a significant shift in geneticand environmental influences on the sample. The influx of the Frenchand other continental groups beginning with the Norman invasion in the11th century is likely the origin of this variation. Centuries ofextreme cold and subsequent illnesses would have also affectedthe[/FONT] [FONT=ff4, Times New Roman, Times, serif]populationsof medieval England, which are mirrored in cranio facial traits. Thesample from the post-medieval period is the most similar to theRomano-British and medieval groups, signifying a great amount ofheterogeneity in the populace. The outcomes of this studyareable to answer the research questions posed at the beginningof analysis. The Norman Conquest did bring widespread craniometricchange to England, and much of the variation in modern Englishpopulations is related to the Romano-British and medievalpopulations.[/FONT][/FONT]
She evocates the case of the possibe opposition country/towns for Normans and followers but does not concerning the possible biases for IA and AS (elites?)