PDA

View Full Version : My LivingDNA results



Syd
31-08-17, 22:46
Hi everybody.


I'm a Central Italian from Lazio.
These are my results.


Europe 77.6%
Europe (South) 61.3%
Great Britain and Ireland 15.1%
Europe (East) 1.2%
Near East 20.7%
Levant 11%
North Turkey 9.8%
Asia (South) 1.6%
Balochistan 1.6%


On 23andme (It's supposed to go 500 years far back in time while LivingDNA 10 generations) I have no MENA, no Sardinia, no Asia but I have 3% north western Europe and 0.2% east Europe.
Imo, in my case the results aren't very accurate.
Perhaps a lack of reference populations from Italy?

srdceleva
31-08-17, 23:21
Hi everybody.


I'm a Central Italian from Lazio.
These are my results.


Europe 77.6%
Europe (South) 61.3%
Great Britain and Ireland 15.1%
Europe (East) 1.2%
Near East 20.7%
Levant 11%
North Turkey 9.8%
Asia (South) 1.6%
Balochistan 1.6%


On 23andme (It's supposed to go 500 years far back in time while LivingDNA 10 generations) I have no MENA, no Sardinia, no Asia but I have 3% north western Europe and 0.2% east Europe.
Imo, in my case the results aren't very accurate.
Perhaps a lack of reference populations from Italy?The ethnicity is really beta right now. No way you have that high of Levant or British dna. Hopefully it will get better.

Sent from my KIW-L21 using Tapatalk

I1a3_Young
01-09-17, 15:44
You are correct, it is a lack of reference populations in Italy.

srdceleva
01-09-17, 17:23
Hi everybody.


I'm a Central Italian from Lazio.
These are my results.


Europe 77.6%
Europe (South) 61.3%
Great Britain and Ireland 15.1%
Europe (East) 1.2%
Near East 20.7%
Levant 11%
North Turkey 9.8%
Asia (South) 1.6%
Balochistan 1.6%


On 23andme (It's supposed to go 500 years far back in time while LivingDNA 10 generations) I have no MENA, no Sardinia, no Asia but I have 3% north western Europe and 0.2% east Europe.
Imo, in my case the results aren't very accurate.
Perhaps a lack of reference populations from Italy?Can you share your regional populations? How much of Tuscany do you score?

Sent from my KIW-L21 using Tapatalk

Syd
01-09-17, 17:44
[QUOTE=srdceleva;518156]The ethnicity is really beta right now. No way you have that high of Levant or British dna. Hopefully it will get better.]

They need to collect more data from big countries like Italy, France and Spain as they are doing in Germany.
I hope that it soon will be.

Syd
01-09-17, 17:46
You are correct, it is a lack of reference populations in Italy.

Yes, so it seems.

Syd
01-09-17, 17:50
Can you share your regional populations? How much of Tuscany do you score?

Sent from my KIW-L21 using Tapatalk

Europe 77.6%
Europe (South) 61.3%
South Italy 24.6%
Tuscany 19.8%
Iberian Peninsula 9.8%
Aegean 3.8%
North Italy 1.8%
Sardinia 1.3%
Great Britain and Ireland 15.1%
Southeast England 3.8%
East Anglia 2.9%
South England 2.5%
Northumbria 2.1%
South Wales Border 2%
South Central England 1.8%
Europe (East) 1.2%
West Balkans 1.2%
Near East 20.7%
Levant 11%
North Turkey 9.8%
Asia (South) 1.6%
Balochistan 1.6%

taiabafa
08-10-17, 09:43
hello, i did test with living DNA, the results give a 29 percent of the brittany, second it can be reliable or living as an english company increases

Stuvanè
09-12-18, 18:09
Carried out my autosomal loading the raw data from 23andMe on Living DNA a few months ago.
Honestly the results seem a bit strange: it provides me with a combination of about 90% European + 10% of Near East (8.4% from Northern Turkey and 1.8% "Kurdish").
I always wonder if it is an ancient contribution from the Bronze Age/first Iron Age or from a more recent legacy, mediated through the Byzantines. If so, I would call into question certain byzantine settlers of the Justinian regiments. They are documented in the area: “Armeni”, “Persoarmeni,” “Persoiustiniani”…
But I still have the doubt that this same quota is actually an artificial component to fix an autosomal of northern/central Italy that would otherwise be too unbalanced towards France and Spain. Even my Scandinavian share is very suspicious, for the same reasons: I think it serves to fix an average that would otherwise be too southern.
I think that Living has yet to collect many italian samples to return a more accurate picture.

10559

Syd
04-02-20, 20:03
My new ethnicity estimate is as bad as the previous one.
Europe 74.7%
Europe (South) 74.7%
South Italy 47.8%
North Italy 17.8%
East Iberia 9%
Near East 25.3%
South Caucasus 21.4%
Arabia 3.9%

05-02-20, 01:36
Living DNA contacted me and said they had updated my results. They are now better than before, so we got that going for us. Then I was about 70/30 English/German. It now shows more accurately:

Europe (North and West) 56.5%
- South Germanic 36.1%
- Northeast Germanic 13.8%
- Northwest Germanic 6.5%

Great Britain and Ireland 43.5%
- Southeast England 21.2%
- Northwest England 3.7%
- Northwest Scotland 3.6%
- East Anglia 3%
- Northern Ireland and Southwest Scotland 2.7%
- South Yorkshire 2%
- Cumbria 1.9%
- South Wales 1.6%
- South Central England 1.5%
- Northumbria 1.2%
- North Wales 1.1%

kingjohn
09-02-20, 15:42
i saw a full ukranian woman living dna update who scored 24% Aegean
all rest of elements in her result are slavic elements but that Aegean
well living dna ......
even if she is southern ukrainian ......

p.s
it seems living dna Aegean might have overlap with living dna east balkan to some extent ..... :thinking:

kingjohn
09-02-20, 16:22
Maybe she has a 100% Greek grandfather? lol ... Do you know how much Aegean she had in the previous result?

i don't know this guy posted his mother results
that's all i know
but he said that he don't know about any greko-albanian heritage in his family ( not surprising )
maybe it is not the update just 1 level before ......
because in the new regions they put finland and estonia in the same group calling it finland
so they have no baltics in the new region if i am not wrong here .....:thinking:



p.s
i am wrong they still have baltic even in the new regions
https://i.imgur.com/pstQ6E4.png