• Don't want to see ads? Install an adblocker like uBlock Origin or use a Europe-based privacy-friendly browser like Vivaldi or Mullvad.

The geographical concept of Europe mirrors the genetic concept of Europe

Tomenable

Well-known member
Messages
6,030
Reaction score
1,754
Points
113
Location
Poland
Ethnic group
Polish
Y-DNA haplogroup
R1b-L617
mtDNA haplogroup
W6a
Good article from Eurogenes:

http://eurogenes.blogspot.com/2017/06/matters-of-geography.html

"Matters of geography

The steppe north of the Black Sea in Ukraine has basically always been considered part of Europe, and just over 100 years ago some guy with a map decided that the steppe between the eastern coast of the Black Sea in Russia and the Ural River in western Kazakhstan should also be Europe.

So nowadays, right or wrong, it's generally accepted that the entire steppe region west of the Ural River, known as the Pontic-Caspian steppe, is in Eastern Europe. Here's a map courtesy of Wikipedia showing how the official boundary between Eastern Europe and Asia has shifted since the 18th century.

Historical_Europe-Asia_boundaries_1700_to_1900.png


But this decision wasn't entirely arbitrary, because the current boundary between Eastern Europe and Asia by and large follows several major geographic barriers, including the Caucasus Mountains, the Caspian Sea and the Ural Mountains. It'd be hard to argue that these barriers haven't had a profound impact across the ages on the character of Europe and its people, and this has probably been known for well over a couple hundred years.

Caspian_steppe.jpg


For instance, if we're to trust the most common interpretations of the works of ancient geographers like Hecataeus and Herodotus, then their worlds in some important ways resembled the typical Principal Component Analysis (PCA) of West Eurasian genetic variation. And it seems that they had a pretty good idea where both the strong continental boundaries and fuzzy areas were located.

Below, on the geographic map inspired by Herodotus, Europa or Europe is delineated from much of Asia by the Black Sea, the Caucasus Mountains and the Caspian Sea, while on the genetic map, most European and Asian populations form two, more or less parallel, clusters fairly cleanly separated by empty space (this was first noted in Lazaridis et al. 2013). Indeed, this empty space is the work of the Black Sea, the Caucasus Mountains and the Caspian Sea acting as rather effective barriers to gene flow between Eastern Europe and Asia (see Yunusbayev et al. 2012).

uvdNsVv6YpNQx8nOGFoV8P3UZQALIcq5GiK1HRJpMZKtvddmZBuSAJDQx5LxYwWr50uLCQC2QKaiamg=w1326-h658-rw


However, on the genetic map, the Iranic Scythians of the Asian steppes straddle my somewhat arbitrary red line separating Europa and Asia, and this is echoed on the Herodotus map by Iranic and related peoples like the Massagetae and Issedones, who inhabit the seemingly undefined part of the world between Europa and Asia east of the Caspian Sea (Mare Caspium).

Nothing really ground breaking, but pretty cool stuff.

On a related note, I've seen the term "mainland Europe" used recently in at least one of the big ancient DNA papers to describe the part of Europe west of the Pontic-Caspian steppe. It seems that the authors wanted to underline the fairly stark genetic difference that existed between most of Europe and the steppe just prior to the expansion of Yamnaya and related steppe herder groups that initiated the formation of the present-day European gene pool.

I can see why they did this, but to my mind they got things backwards. That's because the term mainland implies the opposite of island and/or peninsula, and of course the part of Europe west of the Pontic-Caspian steppe is a relatively narrow strip of land surrounded by water, so it's a peninsula. Let's visualize these two models on a map of Europe courtesy of Wikipedia:

Mainland_vs_Peninsular_Europe.png


I understand that my model might result in heart palpitations for some readers, especially those from Western Europe, who generally see their part of Europe as core Europe, but I feel that it makes good sense from a purely geographic POV.

Posted by Davidski"
 
There's a funny mistake in that article but I won't reveal it.

They way the terms 'mainland Europe' or 'continental Europe' are used in some European countries is apparent in the following article:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continental_Europe

The study should have used terms like Central or Western etc Europe though, because all Europe apart from the islands can be considered 'mainland'.
 
The actual boundaries of Europe are always going to be arbitrary because they are more a geopolitic/ administrative choice then a realistic natural/geographic separation.
These are the major tectonic plates. Eurasia is huge, from Island to Japan.

new_map.jpg
 
Totally agree. "European" can definitely be used as a genetic term. And I think Europe carries less variety in ancestral components than some here might think. The vast majority of land in Europe is inhabited by people who are more or less a 50/50 mix between EEF-WHG and Steppe and form a pretty tight European cluster in World PCAs. The only exceptions are Iberia, Italy, parts of the Balkans, Finland/north Scandinavia, and ethnic minorities in Russia.

Also the Middle East ancestors of Europeans might have been significantly different than any of the important ancestors of any people in the Middle East today. "EEF" is especially seems to have been something unique which mostly contributed to Europeans instead of any Near Easterners.
 
And if you think about Europe has formed a genetic cluster since the Mesolithic. First it was WHG, then EEF came and it became EEF-WHG, then Steppe came and it became EEF-WHG-Steppe. But there were always parts of Europe that didn't cluster perfectly with everyone else. In the Mesolithic it was Scandinavia and Far-Eastern Europe, in the Neolithic it was NorthEast Europe and Russia, today it is the Southern tips, Northern, and Eastern tips of Europe.
 
In my opinion, even Balkan should also seperate as Near East

map-royalgeo-1920.gif
 
In my opinion, even Balkan should also seperate as Near East

map-royalgeo-1920.gif

Why not just add southern Italy and Spain, maybe southern France and go whole hog and recreate the Caliphate?

Or is it just the Ottoman Empire you're trying to re-create?

Please....
 
Why not just add southern Italy and Spain, maybe southern France and go whole hog and recreate the Caliphate?

Or is it just the Ottoman Empire you're trying to re-create?

Please....

Don't Worry,
If I aimed, I wouldn't skip Hungary and Austria at least Vienna

BTW, I see your post as a "Combination of religion and nationality insult".

Nice to meet you. It is good to know real you.
 
Why not just add southern Italy and Spain, maybe southern France and go whole hog and recreate the Caliphate?

Or is it just the Ottoman Empire you're trying to re-create?

Please....

He didn't create that concept. (the concept of 'Near East' as it is depicted in that map)
 
He didn't create that concept. (the concept of 'Near East' as it is depicted in that map)

It's immaterial who created that particular map. It's bunk, and anyone who is posting here should know better. The people of the Balkans are not Near Easterners no matter whether some people from the Near East want to co-opt them.

Furthermore, are we supposed to ignore the fact that it's almost a recreation of the Ottoman Empire? It was a co-incidence that a Turkish member posted it? His response also supports my interpretation. If it's incorrect, he should have said so.

OttomanMap1700-56a041c35f9b58eba4af8f73.jpg


@Boreas,

If I remember my history correctly, the Ottomans were stopped in the Mediterranean and Vienna as well.

Perhaps we should look at it in the inverse to see how silly it is. Perhaps because the Macedonians and Greeks conquered so much of Asian Minor, and kept it for so long, the Turks are basically Greeks with a bit of Northeast and Central Asian?

320167e3dda522461ee6b2e471b49fb5--byzantine-empire.jpg


Please stop playing the victim card. Objectionable propaganda is put out there about taking back the Balkans, you post something like that, and we're not supposed to draw some connections? If that isn't what you meant say so. It would still be wrong even if you were talking about genetics, however. The people of the Balkans are not Near Easterners.

How would people feel if Italians in the press were making noises about taking back their territories, taking irredentism
to unimaginable extremes, and I posted this map and said these people are descended from us?

https://media.licdn.com/mpr/mpr/AAE...mM2LTAzZGYtNGE5MS05NzA5LTdhM2IxMTY2ODYwMA.png

AAEAAQAAAAAAAAp8AAAAJDU4MzUxYmM2LTAzZGYtNGE5MS05NzA5LTdhM2IxMTY2ODYwMA.png


https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-tDneAkPh...m0/PZsZvnTqogo/s1600/Repubblica_di_Genova.png

Repubblica_di_Genova.png
 
Don't Worry,
If I aimed, I wouldn't skip Hungary and Austria at least Vienna

BTW, I see your post as a "Combination of religion and nationality insult".

Nice to meet you. It is good to know real you.

religion and nationality do not count, they are the biggest fabricators of stories the world has known
 
Terminations of East.

Minor Asia Μικρα Ασια. Anatolia
in antique was the coastal lines of modern Turkey
today is the Asian part of Turkey without Kurdish, Armenia, and Kylikeia areas, or Anatolia
it is about same with term Anatolia

Near East,
The East parts of Mediterrenean sea,
core is Lebanon Palestine Iesrael,
wider term includes Cyprys Syria SE Turkey (kylikeia (Elamites) etc) Jordania Egypt,

Arabia
Arabia is clear the Arabian penisula,
the term today may expand due to religious bonds,
Syria Jordania Egypt Libya Algeria Sahara Desert Iraq
Even Somalia and island of Zanzibare for some is Arabia.

Middle East (core)
Middle east core is Messopotamia and Iran
before also Armenia and Caucasus areas were Middle east
as also the ex UssR steppe and Afganistan
Today as middle east we mean ex Iraq Iran

Caucasia ( parts of wider middle east)
areas south and east of Caucasos mountains
mainly Armenia and Azerbaijan and reast around

Steppes ( parts of wider Middle east)
kazakstan Uzbekistan Afgagistan till India

So the wider middle East is from S Caucasus and Messopotamia till India,

India
ok we all know
Pakistan India Bagladesh Imalayia states etc

Indonesia
no need to describe

Far East
with term far East we mean the Pacific Asia except Indonesia,
China Indochina Jappan Korea etc
the Term today has broken to 2

Indochina (part of wider far east)
no need to describe

chinese sea and North Pacific (part of wider Far east)
coastal China Japan Korea Taiwan Phillipines etc
 
It's immaterial who created that particular map. It's bunk, and anyone who is posting here should know better. The people of the Balkans are not Near Easterners no matter whether some people from the Near East want to co-opt them.

Furthermore, are we supposed to ignore the fact that it's almost a recreation of the Ottoman Empire? It was a co-incidence that a Turkish member posted it? His response also supports my interpretation. If it's incorrect, he should have said so.

OttomanMap1700-56a041c35f9b58eba4af8f73.jpg

The concept of the 'Near East' is a concept that people in Western Europe created, not the Ottomans and like the concepts of 'Middle East' or 'Europe' today it was primarily political.
As a Greek I don't like being grouped with anyone else. We have some similarities with all our neighbours to varying degrees.
 
People can express their opinions all they want, so long as it is done civilly. They don't, however, get to change or distort the facts, and that includes changing the definition of commonly used and understood terms.

To call the Balkans the Near East is absurd politically and genetically both.

To persist in doing so after being called out on it, and adding personal and national insults on top of it is...well...lacking in judgment shall we say, and had the highly predictable result.
 
The concept of the 'Near East' is a concept that people in Western Europe created, not the Ottomans and like the concepts of 'Middle East' or 'Europe' today it was primarily political.

Borders have to be put somewhere. Otherwise people will say all of earth is one single continent. Ancient Greeks created the idea of "Europe" and "Asia"(Middle East) not recent western Europeans. And the ancient Persians also believed in this concept.

The "Middle East" and "Near East" are pretty accurate concepts. To put it bluntly the Middle East is where brown Muslim people live, while Europe is where white Christian people live. Genetics isn't the most important divide between Europe/Middle East. I'd say Islam vs Christianity and Arab vs Greco-Roman not genetics is the most important divide.

As a Greek I don't like being grouped with anyone else. We have some similarities with all our neighbours to varying degrees.

No one has claimed the concept of Europe is perfectly accurate. I live in Chicago Illinois, United States. People call the region of America I live in the "Midwest." The Midwest isn't a perfect concept but it is nonetheless a real thing.
 
Terminations of East.

Minor Asia Μικρα Ασια. Anatolia
in antique was the coastal lines of modern Turkey
today is the Asian part of Turkey without Kurdish, Armenia, and Kylikeia areas, or Anatolia
it is about same with term Anatolia

Near East,
The East parts of Mediterrenean sea,
core is Lebanon Palestine Iesrael,
wider term includes Cyprys Syria SE Turkey (kylikeia (Elamites) etc) Jordania Egypt,

Arabia
Arabia is clear the Arabian penisula,
the term today may expand due to religious bonds,
Syria Jordania Egypt Libya Algeria Sahara Desert Iraq
Even Somalia and island of Zanzibare for some is Arabia.

Middle East (core)
Middle east core is Messopotamia and Iran
before also Armenia and Caucasus areas were Middle east
as also the ex UssR steppe and Afganistan
Today as middle east we mean ex Iraq Iran

Caucasia ( parts of wider middle east)
areas south and east of Caucasos mountains
mainly Armenia and Azerbaijan and reast around

Steppes ( parts of wider Middle east)
kazakstan Uzbekistan Afgagistan till India

So the wider middle East is from S Caucasus and Messopotamia till India,

India
ok we all know
Pakistan India Bagladesh Imalayia states etc

Indonesia
no need to describe

Far East
with term far East we mean the Pacific Asia except Indonesia,
China Indochina Jappan Korea etc
the Term today has broken to 2

Indochina (part of wider far east)
no need to describe

chinese sea and North Pacific (part of wider Far east)
coastal China Japan Korea Taiwan Phillipines etc

I don't know where you get the terms but Americans call middle east Israel, Palestine, Iraq, S Arabia, Syria, Jordan
Near East Turkey, Armenia, Cyprus
 
I don't know where you get the terms but Americans call middle east Israel, Palestine, Iraq, S Arabia, Syria, Jordan
Near East Turkey, Armenia, Cyprus

No, they don't. Americans normally use the terms interchangeably. It's a confusing situation, but there you have it.

Even the dictionaries aren't much help because each one has a different definition. At dictionary.com, Cyprus is not included, and the difference between the two is Egypt. As I said, however, the dictionary definitions differ.

Middle East-Also called Mideast. (loosely) the area from Libya E to Afghanistan, usually including Egypt, Sudan, Israel, Jordan, Lebanon, Syria, Turkey, Iraq, Iran, Saudi Arabia, and the other countries of the Arabian peninsula.

Near East-an indefinite geographical or regional term, usually referring to the countries of SW Asia, including Turkey, Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Israel, Jordan, and Saudi Arabia and the other nations of the Arabian Peninsula.

"According to the National Geographic Society, the terms Near East and Middle East denote the same territories and are "generally accepted as comprising the countries of the Arabian Peninsula, Cyprus, Egypt, Iraq, Iran, Israel, Jordan, Lebanon, Palestinian territories, Syria, and Turkey".[1]"

Among Americans Cypriots are considered Greek, largely because all the Greeks stick together, go to the same church etc., Cypriots included. That's common parlance, man on the street talk.

What's clear is that no modern definition of "Near East" includes the Balkans. That's archaic.
 
Some terms may cause confusion but things are pretty clear.

Balkans is part of Europe and nothing to do with classifications which include it together with the Near East.

Turkey is Asia Minor, only small part of Turkey is in the Europe.

Near East and Middle East can make confusion, I don't consider if it is correct or not in Serbia we use term "Near and Middle East".

Europe can be more political than geographical, and there are different views, for example is Azerbaijan in Europe, we can see in Eurovision song several countries which are not certainly in Europe.
 
Back
Top