Recent content by Bodin

I know one thing that Sarmathians certainly brought to Britain - look at Cymru flag - it had Sarmathian dragon.

Why would it be imposible ? If they were all subdued by Huns and they all had a lot of Slavic speacking subjects - limigantes

Why would Bulgarians - turkoIranic nation accepted Slavic languague ?

Have you consider Sarmathian origins ? Because Gepids had only Semberia and Srem on Balkans .

But in that case they would have about same ratio betwen R1a : I2a1b and that is not the case

No Bosnia was not independent kingdom more than Croatia , Bosnia had kingdom only for 100 years ( 1377 - 1463) . Bosnians dont have highest rate of I in Europe , Herzegovina has , and Herzegovina was separate state - Hum / Helm , Travunija / Tribunia and Konavle / Canalia she was under Bosnia...

But Vlachs - descendants of old Balkan populations and Vlachs Turkic military order are not the same . Spartans were most probably G haplogroup like Macedonians , there are also some interesting letters from Jewish head priest to Spartans that claim common origins. I believe I2a1b is Iranic -...

Retreat is best solution for you isnt it :)

Maybe you should read Tacitus once more :) he say Sarmathians live in land that previosly belonged to Scythians that they taken from them . I didnt read Origo Constantinus Imperatoris so you would have to help me : where in Italy did they were settled ? How many of them ? Because I know...

Yes preotoman Bosnia was mainly catholic , Bosnian kings were catholic . Yes Herzegovina was ortodox but there was also a lot of catholics to . No they were not Vlach , they were Serbs from Serbia with Vlach status - it is not etnicity it is simply form of soldier that is fighting for small...

Serbs and Croats entered Balkans separately from Slavs after 626 and was called by emperor Herakleos -Croats : to protect Dalmatia from Avars ( so Avars was in Dalmatia , not Slavs ) and Serbs : to protect Thessaloniki from Slavs , only they didnt like it there and moved to Dalmatia next to...

For instance Tacitus , ... Argaragantes were real Sarmathians , Limigantes were they "slaves " - subdued nations mainly composed of Dacians and Scythians - Slavs among others . This is first time I hier Constantine settled them in Italy , he settled them only in Thracia - no Barbarian nation...

No he is speacking about Serbs and Croats - they were pastoralists - look at Hercegovina anybody who live of agriculture would never survive there - and that is main place of Serbo-Croatian settling . Serbs and Croats settled mountains , not plains , and in any scientific book you would find...

None taken offcourse we are hier to debate . The same stories were spocken about Slavic ancestry of Balkanic nations - they even claimed Goths , Bastarnae , Swede , Sarmathae , Heruli ,... to be Slavic , they claimed Slavs conquered Egypt , ... Slavs are from Atlantis ,... There is always...

And why would all R1a go north and I2a1b south , they didnt have genetic in that times so they could separate that way ? Yes it makes sence , there is few posibilities : maybe slavic was lingua franca in Hunic empire , maybe Sarmathians married Slavic womens and than went to war ( both...