Recent content by JajarBingan

Yes, but M67 suggest a non-Indian origin in Romas. So they picked it from somewhere else, either along the migration way out of India or in Southeast Europe. I actually just posted this question on M67 on another forum, so if you excuse me, I'll just copy paste to make things easier for me. "Do...

The drastic change probably comes from including Western Turks from around Istanbul into a separate "Anatolian" category. They share a lot of ancestry with people from Southeast Europe, with many of them having recent ancestry from there. 23andme might find a way to isolate that signal, as this...

Thank you, first time seeing this reply, as I'm not coming often here. Hopefully in 2020, we will get closer to the Y-DNA of Dacians. Apparently David Reich's lab is working on Roman period samples from the border of Moesia and Dacia, which were likely very similar if not the same people...

Scythians, like all the folk from steppe confederacies were a diverse bunch. Their autosomal profile swinged from East Asian to West Asian to European and everything in between. Here are the Y-DNA they carried according to the available male samples: R1a1a1b2a2a N R1 G-PF3378 R1b1a1a2...

Gorea (single r) is not a popular surname, but it still exists. I know one person with this surname. http://nume.ottomotor.ro/en?search=Gorea&type=circle Same goes for Ruda. http://nume.ottomotor.ro/en?search=Ruda&type=circle Both are most popular in mountainous regions, so maybe they are...

I mean it's possible that it came from Scandinavia, but you'd guess that they left their seed there too. There aren't really any native Y3120 downstreamers there.

All genetics aside weren't the Ruriks supposed to be non-Slavs though? I guess they were just acculturated locals in the end, instead of proper vikings.

This "Thracian" from ~1700 BC falls outside of the time horizon for Thracians. He is possibly, one of the ancestors of Thracians, who brought the language. However, actual settled Thracians and not steppe nomads, like I5769 from 400 BC, are more Southern than modern mainland Greeks. This...

Did they though? At least in aDNA terms the impact of whoever brought East Asian admixture is kind of visible. https://anthrogenica.com/showthread.php?6722-Romanian-23andme

Due to nationalism + inferiority complex

Man, you ought to calm down.

I take what the authors say, without adding any of my own biases and interpretations. I'm familiar with all the studies, which have been referenced here, so I don't feel the need to look at your interpretation. Just wait for the guys who actually work in this field to do their job. There's no...

Angela, calm down and abstain from using ad hominem replies. I'm not used to those kinds of forums. Nah, it means that (60+40)/2=100 North Italians. I know quite well what you thought of when you wrote that. You assumed that North Italians were the R1b rich royals, whereas South Italians were...

Dunno, time will tell. I don't care either way personally, but I hope we find out soon. The paper should be out in a couple of months if I'm not mistaken.

Mate, if in the following period they are predominantly similar to South Italians and you believe that the two didn't mix then you'd expect the North ones to be the non-Roman ones in this case. So yes, your conclusion was puzzling and it came just a couple of posts down after your complaints...