Recent content by Loppan65

Bronze age 5 pop Global: Fit: 3.752 (Moderate) Central Steppe (2100–1800 BC) 71.6% European Farmer (6300–2800 BC) 13.8% Baltic Hunter-Gatherer (5200–4200 BC) 13.0% East Siberian (1000–900 BC) 1.6% Iron age: Fit: 1.734 (Good) Germanic (AD 100–600) 50.2% Insular Celt (600 BC–AD...

I would say it probably does. How France ended up in the 4 pop I have no idea. On familytree I have these results: Europe 100% Finnish Finland 47% Western Europe Scandinavia 28% Central Europe 6% Eastern Europe West Slavic 13% Baltic Baltic 7%

With 3 pop: Fit: 1.104 (Good) Germanic (AD 100–630) 70.4% Baltic (AD 900–1050) 19.6% Saami (AD 300–800) 10.0% With 4 pop: Fit: 1.007 (Good) Germanic (AD 100–630) 41.6% Insular Celt (AD 100–1000) 25.4% Baltic (AD 900–1050) 23.8% Saami (AD 300–800) 9.2%

Fit: 0.905 (Very Good) Germanic (AD 100–630) 42.6% Baltic (AD 900–1050) 24.2% Insular Celt (AD 100–1000) 14.4% Saami (AD 300–800) 9.6% France (AD 130–1400) 9.2%

30 closest ancient populations: Closest Ancient Samples Genetic Distance Nordic Iron Age (Rombäck) AD 450–500 2.634 Nordic Iron Age (Öland) AD 300–500 2.923 Goth (Wielbark Culture) AD 40–210 3.191 Nordic Iron Age (Scania) AD 427–611 3.228 Nordic Iron Age (Gotland) AD 600 3.284 Quadi AD...

These are my results on Illustrative DNA. 30 closest modern populations: # Population distance 1 Swedish 2.569 2 Finn (Southwest) 3.261 3 Norwegian (Bergen) 3.600 4 Norwegian 3.716 5 Icelander 3.773 6 German (Hamburg) 3.839 7 Danish 3.931 8...

Ok, so noone knows nothing about how to interpret dodecad's results? In that case, could somebody provide me with a link where everything is described for Dodecad, I seem not able to find it here. I would appreciate it alot. /Char

Hello everyone, I have used Dodecad12b to try and find out a little more about my ancient history, but I'm not sure what it all means. The lower distance to samples meaning closer in relationship to the population or? I will attach a few images from my results here. I'd be very happy to get some...