Recent content by Ravnur

Of course they can't be pure "something" as everything in Eurasia and they have some Siberian admixture, just because they live close to it. But at the same time, I think people from Volga-Ural and Northern Dvina areas are the best candidates to be EHG carriers (at least by percentage)...

I don't know :) I live in 100km from the Lithuanian border and have the same percentage of "Baltic" in K15 as the Loschbour mesolithic sample has, which is obviously WHG and all modern calculators use it as a part of WHG pattern. I guess that the best candidate for the marker you are talking...

I don't think that there is an exact border between WHG and EHG. It is mostly an artificial division based on a few aDNA samples and the reality looks like a gradient. By the way, the "pure" WHGs: F999915 (La Braña-Arintero, Mesolithic Spain, 5960-5750 BC) has 48.33 of "Baltic" in Eurogenes K13...

According to the results of mine and M434508 and A146377 from the above posts there is no direct conformity. All of us have for about 50% or a bit less of WHG and 20-25% of EHG by MDLP K11. So in total it's more than "Baltic" in Eurogenes K13 and at the same time "Baltic" is not only WHG or EHG...

Belarusian, Minsk area K13: 51.18 K15: 33.24