Search results

Besides correct me if I'm wrong but the Anatolian Neolithic Farmers ancestral component is something shared by nearly all of Europe anyway so there's nothing peculiar in that either.

Sure, central and southern Italy have less blue and green eyes than the Lebanese and the Moroccans (who in turn are in the same ballpark as the Northern Italians my god)... :ROFLMAO: Anyone who's been anywhere in Italy can see those percentages are rubbish. In Italy no one considers light eyes...

Agreed. Just the same as any other Southern European country so, again, I can't understand this fixation with Italy.

You don't say... Of course the Southern Europeans are closer than the Northern Europeans to the West Asians. Give this man a Nobel prize already. Still far enough.

Who's drawing those arbitrary "groups", you? :ROFLMAO: Even in this crackpot PCA of yours can't you see that all the Southern Europeans are much closer to the other Europeans than to Iran? Like Tautalus said, you can't read and interpret a PCA and it's the same as the pictures that you keep...

^ Iranians overlapping with Northern Italians and Spaniards... The height of absurdity we are forced to endure in this thread has reached unimaginable levels :ROFLMAO:

Of course. Then why are you using this thread to post pictures of depigmented Iranians while insistently claim that they look like Europeans?

As far as I can see it's only your insecure Middle Eastern buddy here who keeps spamming his useless pics. I correct myself, not "useless" but in fact "harmful" to his own agenda. As for you, tell me more about your own activity on this site as you apparently came here only to participate to...

F*** off to the Apricity dude. I bet IRL you look almost Pakistani. :ROFLMAO:

You can immediately tell who's the Russian and who's the Iranian in these pictures, once again you are embarassing yourself and your people.

No need to prove anything, it is what it is. Also Lazaridis never said or even hinted that the original Indo-Europeans looked like the modern Iranians give us a break, you are a clown but even clowns get boring after while.

So accurate.

I used the word "comparable" in my second post about this matter, stating that Iranians' genetic distances to Italians within Europe can only be COMPARABLE to those with far North-Eastern Europeans (which Belarusans and Estonians are). That is a VERY slight "correction", if you want me to call...

We Northern Italians practice self restraint, even with trolls from The Apricity/Reddit :ROFLMAO: That's the way to get under their skin, as this new "Swiss" user already on a desperate 10-posts streak shows...

You may check PCA plots and genetic distances. Within Europe probably only the distance of (some) Italians to the Finns and far North-Eastern Euros is comparable to that to the Iranians. No, that was not his point (his point was and is to infer that Iranians and Italians are genetically...

No, wrong unless you mean they are geneticall close compared to their respective distance to Koreans or Bantus.

That's a highly contentious statement and I won't debate it to not derail this thread any further.

If Iran is not Middle East I really don't know what Middle East is supposed to be, maybe Nepal? :ROFLMAO: Those playing with words here are the researchers, for the reasons I've explained above, and you probably for self-delusion.

1. Iran is Middle East, not Near East which in this study is a by-word for Eastern Mediterranean. 2. "significant influence" is very subjective: some people may consider 80% to be "very significant", others 2-5%... It all depends on the context. On the other hand I see why these researchers...

The obsession for pigmentation is all yours, posting people who look like depigmented North Indians. :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: