Search results

I have a problem with this claim too. Many people come to the conclusion they were Bedouin like because they cluster on 2 dimensional PCAs just next to them. But this is merely projection bias. When I run ancient Levant Neolithic samples through calculators and compare them with Bedouin samples...

These white supremacists nut jobs are as bad as Afro_Centrics. I have been commenting on some of these articles from various News websites. The headers of many of these articles are so misleading. For example Russia Todays headline is "Ancient Egyptians have ancestry from Europe and the Middle...

We already have Sarmatian samples. So far these Haplogroups have been found 1. G2a 2. R1a 3. J1 4. J2 5. R1b edit: Why a Negrep Papadimitriou?

Yes there was a statement of a sample from very early Neolithic in Central Anatolia who was significantly higher in the WHG like component compared to the later Anatolian_Farmers.

If the samples are homogenous over a timespan of 1000 years and more, I guarantee you we are not dealing here with foreign admixture. South Egyptians might had more SSA admixture (around 15% like modern Egyptians) but I doubt that North and Middle Egyptians differed much from these samples at hand.

Wasn't there a rumour or statement in a study that they found a mesolithic Anatolian sample which looked like a WHG individual? I for sure remember something like that. So indeed as I have proposed it seems there was a fluent cline from WHG to ANE from Anatolia to Caucasus/North Iran. And than a...

Not more European but more Caucasian aka Near Eastern.

The site where the samples come from have no record of Hyksos or Greek settlements + they are burried in typical Egyptian fashion. There is absolutely no way that they were mixed with Hyksos. They are Iran_Neo admixed because the ancient Egyptian derive most likely from late-Neolithic or Bronze...

As I thought, Ancient Egyptians look like a Levant_BA or Levant_ late Neolithic population rather than Levant_Neolithic/Natufian. So ancient EGyptians might indeed be a Bronze Age arrival in the region, explains their more modern Middle Eastern like DNA in comparison to other North Africans who...

The Basque language is most likely Anatolian_Neo derived. the reason why there is allot of similarities between Kartvelian and Basque is not because it shares ancestry from the Caucasus or CHG spoke Kartvelian like language. Contrary Georgian language seems to be a post Neolithic arrival in the...

Iran_CHL has Anatolian/Levant_Neo and CHG admixture.

The Caucasian in this calculator is based on modern samples from the Caucasus and not to be confused with CHG. Otherwise good finding there.

Modern Anatolia is more than just EEF+ Iran_Neo/CHG not neccessary because of the Bronze Age but predominantly because of the Iron and Middle Ages. many Steppe and Central Asian groups moved into Anatolia during that timeframe (Cimmerians, Sarmatians, Alans, Scythians, Mitanni-Medes-Parthians...

sooooo maybe. CHG to Balkan => mixing with the local H&G who seem to have allot of R1a/R1b lineages=> new local Balkan H&G/CHG and Anatolian_Neo admixed population => to the Steppes, with founder effect where only few lineages reach the region? Thats also a interesting theory.

There is something telling me, "maybe there is a reason why ftDNA labeled a clearly CHG type component as Iron Age Invaders". Maybe/likely there is a reason why the scientists collectively start to call Yamnaya Late PIE. So we who were theorizing the Steppes as secondary homeland to Indo...

You are right, I understand your point. But we have to understand the scientists it's not like they want to change but they have to because with new samples they have better understanding of the bigger picture.

I actually like these turnovers :D

Now the question is what does he mean with Caucasian languages? There is no single Caucasian language family. 2. Who says "these Caucasian languages" were already in the Caucasus during the Late Neolithic? For example Kartvellian looks more like an Anatolian_Farmer language. 3. Kartvellian...

Considering that by 2000 BC and probably even a little earlier we have archeological evidences of Steppe groups in that region such as Cimmerians, Scythians in Urartu, Subaru and the Mitanni.

That is because Bulgaria is the only possible route how they could have reached Anatolia if the Balkan route was correct, that is such an easy explanation don't know how some missed that. Or are you propossing that the proto Anatolians went to Croatia and later settled in Bulgaria. It's just...