Search results

It doesnt suggest anything, it just suggests the the whole model is bad, you dont know which proxy is not needed in this context. Whats a good Germanic proxy for Italians on qpAdm?

Armenia_LBA is too old, when the migration happened to italy a lot have happened in Anatolia.

Thats because you need to use the proper ones, proper right pops and proper left pops.

The score is far from perfect, its not even close to passing. Thats because you need an Armenian like proxy together with the Minoan one or remove minoan and just add the Imperial West Anatolian cluster + North African + Italic. These are the ID's. Group them...

I meant that you are not supposed to consider a model better because of the p value.

You are not supposed to P value rank on qpAdm, keep that in mind. All these mdels are rejected models, which means that they need something else. the p value here is 0.0000000114 when the p value required for a plausible model is 0.05/

Whatever the study did, was simplified irrelevant stuff. These people have no proper critical thinking when it comes to population genetics. 0.25x means distance control i think. It increases the distance cap so the model doesnt overfit.

I made a better Greek Imperial outlier, the previous one had Italic-Germanic and other mixes. ​

The C6 samples seem all over the place, one is even 50% Levantine + Germanic like, and coincidentally plots it with Italians. Its not a real population cluster, these "studies" seem to simplify everything into irrelevant PCA's and mislead people. C6 are just a bunch of mixed saples that...

Nothing is meaningful here because of how high the standard errors are, ignore models with standard errors that high.

Can you send me the IDs of the C6 samples?

These are the commands Setting up the pathes prefix = 'D:/rich dadaset/data/few data/v54.1_1240K_public'my_f2_dir = 'D:/rich dadaset/data/my_f2_dir' outprefix = 'D:/rich dadaset/data/outprefix' library(admixtools) library(tidyverse) For running a model. right = c('Ethiopia_4500BP.DG'...

Ive heard they lowered the p value threshold to 0.01, i dont know which new study says this. But i prefer to stick with 0,05 while 0.01 being acceptable in some cases.

I dont know, and i was asking people if they are Carians or Greeks archeologically and no one seems to know. Here are their cords and ids...

We have a lot of samples from 700-480BC Mugla West Anatolia. They are almost the same as the Mycenaeans from Attica but with a bit more Iran N. Scroll up i posted the models. a quick qpAdm chart i made, many models have bad p values but proportions shouldnt be affected. right =...

Yes, Logkas02 has around 28% and Logkas04 has around 46%. We see that Steppe was getting diluted quite early in Greece before reaching the main Mycenaean region. P 0.263 target left weight se z <chr> <chr>...

Steppe was not negligible, the Mycenaeans had 10-20% steppe (varies by region). The samples from Thessaly that could be proto Greeks have 35% steppe and their steppe levels vary a lot. So that mixed Balkan like source could have brought the Proto-Greek language. Thats over 30% proto-Greek admix...

The Gordion_Anc samples are not all Phrygians, only 2 from 650BC are Phrygians, the majority of them are from the Hellenistic period and have clear Greek admix. The Halikarnassos samples seem to be a mix of mainland Greek + Levantine. On my old qpAdm models they showed more Natufian than...

I think Halikarnassos is a recent mix. The Mugla Archaic samples are probably more representative of the iron age West Anatolians, unless they aren't coastal enough and less mixed than the coastal Aegeans. The Mugla Iron age West Anatolian samples seem to be almost the same as the Mycenaeans but...

Everything is mixed, there is no choice but to use mixed procxies, i just meant that Peloponnese_N is not an average of homogenous samples from one period but they span 2-5k years and differ in admixture (i forgot the exact year numbers), it seems that their Iran N just increased over time. It...