Search results

That's it. The homeland of the Indo-European languages is Iran. Done.

Why do you think that's wrong ? do you have evidence to support your claim ?

No, the majority of the ancestry of EHG is ANE, which they share with Native Americans. about 75% ANE, the rest is WHG.

Maybe I have :) we all die eventually. As to my group being targeted, my group doesn't think we're one group, we still target each other :)

Well, as long as they dont have political influence, who cares :) Middle Easterns should turn out to be a mixture of Basal Eurasians and groups related to European hunter-gatherers, with further dilution of Basal compared to the Neolithic, by ancestry in the direction of Europe actually. We're...

They may have been there before 4 ka, the absence of written records doesn't imply they didn't exist.

Given that their name didn't pass to their city, ok, granted. But were the Luwians, Palaians, and Lydians small tribes too ? if they weren't then some admixture should have accompanied their arrival.

How did you determine they were a small tribe ? There are many Anatolian languages in Anatolia, that to me doesn't suggest they were a small tribe.

OMG I created a thread for this and I was very excited, it turned to be fake :( I wonder what else Mellaart faked or imagined.

These clusters are indeed based on moderns, but I think they do "correlate" with some ancient populations. When you cluster people at K=3, you usually get West_Eurasian, East_Eurasian, and African clusters. at a higher K, West_Eurasian divides into a Baltic_Atlantic cluster and a Near Eastern...

What is really European in their mindset ? Europeans could be modelled as a mixture of the Near Eastern cline + European HG cline. anyone who fits this model is European. European hunter-gatherers aren't European in the same sense Near Easterners are not European.

There is ANE admixture in East asians. Would having higher amounts in east asians hypothetically make someone appear more caucasian ? assuming that it's not originally *Mongoloid* What's the origin of caucasoid features anyway ?

comments are sickening indeed, they discuss one thing while David Reich discusses another .. somehow they reached the conclusion that Reich is a racist scientist and says black people have low IQ. idiots. Races exist biologically and are not a social construct, and instead of trying to hide...

I guess that puts doubts to rest regarding Basal Eurasian's existence.

The highest in the Middle East are : 11. Israel (7.190) 20. United Arab Emirates (6.774) 32. Qatar (6.374) 33. Saudi Arabia (6.371) 43. Bahrain (6.105) 45. Kuwait (6.083) 70. Libya (5.566) 74. Turkey (5.483) 84. Algeria (5.295) 85. Morocco (5.254) 87. Azerbaijan (5.201) 88. Lebanon (5.199) 90...

Ah, I feel the same, I do hope that there is meaning in our existence, and I did love God and faith ... but evidence pointed to the human origin of the Quran because of the scientific and philosophical flaws in it, and so I left my faith. I was 16 at the time.

I don't think Basal Eurasians are exclusively associated with E1b1b after all Iran Neolithic and hunter-gatherers had higher levels of Basal but no E1b1b.

I thought LeBrok was a Catholic, I misunderstood a reference in some other thread, sorry LeBrok.

IronHorse :smile: The thing is, where I'm from its dangerous to criticize religion in public, in our case because extreme religious people take control, I don't know if this is or was the case whenever religious people took control. I know, however, that there is no direct relationship...

What do you think of this opinion from Maciamo https://www.eupedia.com/genetics/funnelbeaker_culture.shtml There are some outdated concepts but intriguing none the less.