Search results

With those rights: Mbuti.DG, Russia_Sunghir_UP.SG Russia_Yuzhniyoleniyostrov_Mesolithic.AG Turkey_Marmara_Barcin_N.AG Italy_Epigravettian.AG.BY.AA Morocco_Iberomaurusian.AG To me this is fine because the p-value is nearly 10x 0.05 and the sources are related (similar steppe/ANF portions)

Denmark IA + France Yonne IA like I did. Also, IA NW Euro + East Med. I really enjoy testing out people's reference lists!

OpenAI thought it was an alright list of references. Although it can make mistakes. Those other 2 models were done with different right groups: If you'd like you can suggest a reference list for me to test those sources with. I always like to experiment.

Subtle admixtures could be missed with this model, I think. You have to keep in mind those 2 populations are not that far apart genetically. qpAdm will have issues distinguishing them. France Yonne IA and Denmark IA are both IA NW Europeans. Z-Score is over 3 also. Which even then Z scores...

Subtle admixtures could be missed with this model, I think.

I hope they can pull it off. It will be interesting to see how it affects things geopolitically. Iran/China/Russia ousted in Venezuela and now this.

In this model and others that I have ran it looks to me like the iron age Germanic groups are absorbing some Celtic (insular&continental) ancestry. My guess is that its because the two groups have similar steppe/ANF/WHG admixtures and it's hard for qpAdm to assign where it's coming from. With...

France_Medieval_o.AG_I15027.AG is a medieval Breton

New:

Gradient set to 0.2 With the modified northwest average and Celtiberians I can model myself as 100% as an Iron Age Gaul from Yonne in qpAdm. I've tried France Grand Est IA2 and it fails at a p value of ~0.01.

Here are some Iron and Bronze Age models: And a few Medieval: This one contains pooled Southern Medieval Italians I chose to share this one instead of Spain Medieval because those produce much higher standard errors

Some of them try to claim Papuans and Onge people because of their somewhat similar skin tone and facial features. But it's so easy to refute by showing how far apart those groups are genetically to Sub-Saharan populations by showing a PCA chart. If they wish to argue solely on skin tone, then I...

Did some admixture modeling for NUE001. And I understand why the authors like the Morocco MN sample as a source: Modeled with just Natufian:

And then experimented with more references:

Check this study out. It basically reveals there is some affinity with Pinarbasi (AHG) and the Levant. And then later neolithic Anatolians picked up more Levant ancestry...

Did another Steppe, ANF, WHG model with a modified list of references from Genarchivist. The ANF is an individual Bar25. I modeled Bar25's admixture as well: Reference populations:

If some of it does not come from Roman and Greek period interactions, then it's from ANF. This model works because Corded Ware has ANF and so does Jordan_PPNB. Jordan_PPNB is around 60/40 Natufian/Anatolian. Sometimes modeled with some Iran_N. References: