Search results

You guys don't get it, the Sicilians/Maltese/Jews and also Morodvians/Finns are out of range for this test, since they have additional layers of admixture out of the EEF/WHG/ANE ancestries-. In the first group, is because of near-east ancestry, in the second because of Siberian.

It's not hard to find, there is plenty of info on Fulani autosomal, in this recent study for example using Admixture, one can see Fulani are a mix of West-African (yellow component, peaking in Yoruba) and North-African (light blue, present in northern-africans) :

I don't agree with Maciamo, the eurasian admxiture that Fulani have is from northern-africans (Berber admixture). Other populations have as well high levels of R1b-V88 (in parts of Cameroon reaches 90%) yet don't have this kind of admixture.

But you have not paid attention to what the study says, that Sicilians, Maltese and Ashkenazy results should not be taken in account, because they have recent near-east ancestry beyond what the neolithic farmers have, so their results are skewed.

The Motala samples are not neolithic farmers , but Hunter-Gatherers.

Im very anti-EU and I would like to get ouf it badly, and also get back to our national money (the Peseta). To hell with the EU.

Where do you get that ? Because as far as I know, northern Iberia has one of the highest peaks of U5 in Europe (the Cantabria-Basque area), reaching near 20%

Stop calling me with "wilhelmina" Im more manly than you faggot, I demand an explanation from Moderators.

They were not indo-european, but PRE-indoeuropean similar to Basques, we have told you that already.

You are the one with crazy bullshit theories. We have ancient DNA from Iberians, and If the iberians were phoenicians, then how on earth their mtDNA tested to be similar to modern iberians.

You sir are misinformed. Catalans are near 80% R1b, and have like only 2-3% of haplogorups J and E (similar levels as Sweden or Northern Germany). The iberian language had nothing to do with levantines, it was related with Basque. And it's not true that greeks and phoenicians "heavily"...

I would expect haplogroup N, due to Saami/North-East euro affinity, but since he also had decent amount of Atlanto-Med, he could have also R1, G, I,.

I remember in the previous study of genetic isolates from Friul-Venezia Giula that some of them plotted with Basques, or even further away, that may have to do with being 80-90% R1b in some of these samples ??

On the Admixture K=9 in the supplmentary info he is 37% South-Asian, 34% North-European, 26% Native American and 4% Oceanian

Nope, the study can be found here. It's from the University of Zaragoza in collaboration with a moroccan university. As for the Spanish sample, it's not from Basques but actually from Madrid and Zaragoza and taken from another study (Dahmany et al.)

So high in Iberia ? I've done my own research and by no means it arrives at the 7.5-10% as you put in South Spain...here are some samples that I have : Spain n = 15/813 1.84% Achilli et al 2007 Spain, n = 0/686 0.00% Rhouda 2006 Spain n = 0/233 0.00%...

There is also mtDNA H in mesolithic Northern-Europe, in Oleni Kastrov

Some of these mtDNA haplogroups are so random..it's hard to give them an explanation..

You don't have to take it literally these components, the East-Euro doesn't mean literally ancestry from Eastern-Europe , because this East-Euro component peaks in Lithuanians, and so you being Slovakian, you are more Central/Western euro than them, your East-Euro score is similar to the average...

Ok where can I see the updated map ?