Search results

Yes. It seems that they were indeed East European. Brahmin as a caste was formed in India but there paternal ancestors were indeed Sintashta Steppe Herders. And remember that only the Kings like Darius and Cyrus called themselves Aryan,not the common Persians. And they likely had direct...

Answer me first.

Also,do remember that if you are a Brahmin yourself,you are abusing your own paternal line! By degrading R1A-Z93 and calling it non-aryan,you are calling YOUR OWN ANCESTORS UN-ARYAN,which is a huge sin in Vedic Tradition.

Of course R1A-Z93 will never be found in older samples of Iran and India given that speakers of Indo-Iranian language originated in the Eurasian Steppe! If you are implying that R1A-Z93 is not Aryan then you are implying that Brahmins are of an unknown line of fathers,which again means calls...

The Narasimhan paper had many co-authors INCLUDING NIRAJ RAI. So you are making your own case weaker. If there were Aryans in West of Iran in 1700 BC does that mean that there were no Aryans in the East? That is quite unique reasoning. In fact,in Bronze Age,Aryans had conducted massive...

The oldest known Aryans are not Mittani at all since only the ruling classes were of Aryan Origin. Medes and Persians were largely assimilated natives and neither were they the people of Avesta. The East Iranians,or the real Avestans like Pashtuns,Sogdians,Bactrians etc,were very rich in R1A as...

Not really. West Bengal Brahmins have 70% R1A,Bihar Brahmins 63% R1A,UP Brahmins 65% and so on. Manipuri people did have a hindu influence and might have easily come through Gangetic Brahmins,while Lohanas are likely to have influences from nearby East Iranians like Pashtuns. There are hardly...

The Brahmin line is predominantly R1A-Z93 L-657. Also,earliest IE culture have been found in the Eurasian Steppe. Are you saying that Brahmins have non-Aryan origin?