Search results

Yes, that's correct. Here is the study :

But there is Celtic topnymia in Basque lands. Or at least Indo-european (non-latin)

Agree with guys here, there is no proximity between Adygei and Italians. The Adygei are a Caucasus population, they cluster near Georgians and Turks, not with italians.

About the mediterranean component, this is what I said already, it's not really mediterranean, it's southwestern euro, it is actually higher in Germanic people than in Greeks or Sicilians, so the mediterranean label is completely wrong.

Moroccans are also causing alot of trouble here in Spain, specially in towns were their numbers are high. Every week you see some type of criminality committed by a moroccan. It's the truth. They have very difficulty to adapt (supposing they want, my guess is that they don't want)

Yes, there is a dutch sample. Here you have their components : Mediterranean 39.7 Far Asian 0.1 Siberian 0 North European 45.8 South Asian 0.3 West African 0 Caucasis 5.1 Gedrosia 8.1 East Africa 0 Southwest Asian 0.7 Southeast Asian 0 Northwest African 0.2

Are you full greek ? Doing a Oracle of your resuslts, the greeks are not even in top10, and by a large margin : [1,] "Romanians" "8.4332" [2,] "Bulgarian_D" "9.2787" [3,] "Bulgarians_Y" "9.926" [4,] "N_Italian_D" "14.3159" [5,] "Hungarians" "16.189" [6,] "O_Italian_D"...

There is actually Celtic (or at least IE non-latin) topnymia in today Basque Country, and as for the Roman presence, basques are not an excpetion, the roman presence was never en mass anywhere in Iberia. What made the difference is their technological and military superiority. The reason why...

Plese, stay with facts. The highest concentration of paleolithic mtDNA U5 has been found in modern Northern Navarrese (basque speakers) at 15-17%, also mtDNA H1,H2, and V is high in all the cantabrian-pyrenees fringe.

Look at the map of component, one can see that mediterranean is the most European component, while Northern-European in reality is more like a Northaest Euro or Balto-Slavic (peaks in Lithuanians-Finns)

Basque today is not jus spoken in Basque Country, also in Navarra, specially northern navarra, that area is a hotspot of basque speakers.

Yes it's strange, but in some cases the difference is not that big, for example Germans have 7.8 caucasis + 4.4 gedrosian, similar to Spaniards 7.9 + 4.9

No, R1b of Basques has nothing to do with that of caucasus. It's the typical Western-European S116 subclades.

Strange this run. Germanics, like the Dutch, Scandinavians or Birtish have about 40% of mediterranean, it has never been that high, I suspect the label is wrong, it is more like an Atlantic/Southwest component, since it peaks in Basques at 70%. As for the Gedrosian component, it is higher in...

There is ~90% of R1b in Basques. The 80% is in Catalans and the Pyrenees.

That's wrong. Basques do have their own accent, when they speak spanish you can immediately tell if he is basque, they have a sort of "thick" accent, very characteristic of basques, any spaniard knows what im talking about.

By the way, Slovenians have exactly the same sub-sharan as Spaniards at Dodecad, 0.5%, but obviously nobody talks about it, very curious. Oh, and the African map of Maciamo should be updated, the total African for Slovenians is 1%

Very well explained.

It's not my fantasies, you can see the percentages here, West-Eurasia K=10 (the last Eurogenes run) : http://bga101.blogspot.com/2011/09/genetic-substructures-across-west.html Sub-Saharan for Spaniards : 0%

WRONG. The last Eurogenes run (WE_10) shows 0% of SSA in spaniards.