Search results

Compare your results from before the update and after the update. From what most people have claimed, the update was bad. For my own DNA, the results have been quite good, so it was a shocker to hear that some people got garbage results. My 2025 results: My 2024 results: How do your new...

Since I’ve perfected my iron age UK model, I think it would be nice to share the results that some UK groups get on it. Denmark_IA.SG represents DNA from Germanic speakers, Scotland_IA.AG represents DNA from insular Celts, And Czechia_IA_Hallstatt.SG represents DNA from continental Celts...

My PCA of Europe around 1100 BCE to 500 CE. The time period is generally inconsistent (mainly because of Scandinavia), but in Scandinavia there would not have been much genetic change since the Iron Age. Here is the .txt for the PCA: Let me know where you’re clustering on the PCA! (If European...

If you're of non-northeast European ancestry, remove the "BSD" component and use ADC 0.25x If you are of northeast European ancestry, keep the BSD component and use ADC 0x

I'm thinking that Illustrative probably miscalculated my CHG percentage. Don't really know. It does kind of mess up when we get a sample with Asiatic admixture (like Finns), but the calculator should remain fairly accurate to IllustrativeDNA.

May not be accurate for those with Natufian or Zagros ancestry, it tends to inflate Natufian ancestry and deflate Zagros ancestry. CHG tends to be deflated by a deviation of 1%. It will be inflated into your European HG ancestry. For myself, it's almost completely accurate, the ANF is spot-on...

Use with an ADC of 0.25x. If you have any Baltic/Scandinavian hunter-gatherer ancestry, I think that goes to WSH. If you have any Iran_N/Zagros ancestry, it goes to your ANF ancestry.