Search results

Bulgarians and Macedonian Slavs are the most Balkan native Slavic-speaking folks, which is why you see them plot so closely to Albanians. Regardless of what you say, Albanians are situated in the Balkans and still plot the closest to Tuscans. We're just slightly east of Tuscans since we...

^Put tested Tuscans in that map and you'll even see the eastern-shifted Tuscans going toward Albanian direction.

Ghegs from various regions:

Albanians are between Tuscans & mainland Greeks. Albanians generally shift north-west genetically of Greeks, and slightly east of Tuscans. That's all.

R1b was already in Europe-Balkans 8000BC. R1a was in North-Eastern Europe. Albanians, Greeks, Romanians and Bulgarians share mostly the same branches of Balkan R1b, same goes for EV13 and J2b2 among them. Close to a 100 million Slavs under I2a1b-CTS10228 share a TMRCA of only like 2000 years...

Albanians are the closest peoples of the Balkan peninsula to the Tuscans/Central Italians genetically. We plot very closely to Tuscans.

When he entered Asia, the young king brought with him 12,000 phalangists - 9,000 pezhetairoi and 3,000 hypaspists. He also brought with him over 7,000 Greek infantry, most of which would be used to maintain conquered lands as garrison troops. While the army that crossed the Hellespont in 334...

You are wrong and your posts reek of bias and ignorance, Serbian. J2b2 is among the best candidates for Illyrian, along with R1b-L23 and EV13. There is decent amount of J2b2 in Italy, while I2a1b-CTS10228 is 0% there. If I was sperging like you always are, I would claim J2b2 was brought to...

While at the same time. Illyrian haplogroups R1b-L23, J2b2-L283 and EV13 can be found in both Italy and Romania.

There are Aromanians with 22.4% R1a. Their I2a1b-CTS10228 was brought by Slavs mixing with them.

South Slavs share a relatively young clade, called I2a1b-CTS10228, which is significantly lower among non-Slavic speakers and is elevated in areas where the Slavs arrived en masse. So it is definitely SLAVIC. Russians and Ukrainians have a higher number of I2a1b-CTS10228 than do South Slavs...

What's so new or fascinating about this? It's the sole reason why Iberia is highly dominated by R1b. Simple logic.

Bulgarians are the most Balkanic Slavs, along with FYROM and Montenegro.

Yep. This proves my point again. Nothing can be Yamnaya-derived without any Caucasus component.

Not before you post the numbers you claimed in your initial response. Finnic groups have little-to-none Caucasus.

Finns have little-to-none CHG, so they cannot be linked to Yamnaya ancestry. Yamnaya had more than 30% CHG admixture. Regardless if they are 70% similar, does not matter one bit. The CHG admixture is empty in Finns, since Finns aren't Indo-European.

There is no such thing as "Yamnaya" admixture. They carried several components: North Euro combined with CHG and some Asiatic components. It was weeded out in several areas, also populations carrying similar admixture ratios(minus any CHG) taking over different areas many years later are not...

Impossible. Look at the TMRCA of all the modern I2a-CTS10228 carriers, it spread from 1 single ancestor recently, all genetic evidence pointing from the Slavs. All of these populations you mention carried none of it. The same way I1 escaped from Central Europe in the Bronze Age, to...

There has been 0 confirmed Scythian R1a-Z93 samples so far. The confirmed Scythian samples found have been R1b-L23.

All of these ethnocentric geneticists are biased and they have all been debunked. None of them should be taken seriously at any rate.