Search results

According to the Strabo's text, Roman province of Illirya itself is mostly populated with Pannonians and other people, not by Illyrians... thing is Romans deliberately made weird borders of provinces in order to confuse national identities of people and create big melting pot... that strategy...

When we had thread about Etruscans, I have tried reading his text that relates Etruscan language to Hungarian, and it didnot make much sense...so personally, I think his theories are on very shaky grounds... but on other hand linguistic continuity makes sense, as we see something similar in...

I know Zanipolo, those are Serians who live in Caspian highlands unguarded from Sarmatians....from them came into existance Siraces who lived north of Black sea and those who stayed became turkicized and their name was later recorded as Sabirs. Today Chuvash people carry part of their genetics...

you are not following the storyline... point was in sharing that suffix with both illyrian and czech,,, so where does it come from - from Illyrian or from bohemia? isn't simplest explanation the Scordisci/Serdi moving along Danube? note that according to Strabo Scordisci lived mixed with...

I will not even try because I was comparing vocabularies and I know that cognjates are not nearly close to be able to translate..... it is not black or white issue.... celtic genetic origin doesnot mean speaking celtic language look at France.... connected languages doesnot imply same...

actually, everything fits perfectly... but it is hard to explain big picture to someone who is capable to zoom only on few adjacent pixels and if he cannot map them to object patterns previously known to him than the whole picture does not exist for him...... from...

sorry but that is ill reasoning... you claim that I2 was in Europe before J2 and E-V13, but I2a was in Europe after them.... knowing that I2a is continuation of I2, that statement just makes no sense at all regardless of actual dates.. if I settled an area, how can you be equally native as my...

-dava is not suffix in that word.... Vaišvydavos is one of gods (devas in Indian) in indian vedas (Vishvedavas)... Vaišvydavos giria is forst of that god btw. giria is cognjate with Slavic gora

I never claimed it is... I just notice that Roberto Salinas Price reknown linguist says that it was clearly translated to proto-Greek from some proto-Slavic language... so I say it is possible as well... http://www.homer.com.mx/Heroic_Age/IAOLKOS.html you lived in ancient Macedonia? you expect...

lol, besides claim on timing being incorrect, you do not even realize that I2a comes from I2

english: construction site serbian:gradilište Czech: staveniště Slovak: staveniska macedonian:gradilišteto english: purgatory serbian: čistilište russian: chistilishche macedonian:čistilišteto bulgarian: chistilishte I am lazy to search for more words, but suffix exists for sure in Czech...

sure I am in line with some looneys and and you are in line with Occam... .I'll put focus on "suggest" in your claim... it can also be by assimilating previous population in later times than you propose... note that I2a1 is also widely present in some other parts of Spain.. lol, guess you...

I guess most of history and of your claims are ridiculous as well in that case..... we here have genetics as additional clue to reconstructing long time history.... nope, for long time intervals they have much more sense than linguistics...as they are identity of tribes... they are transfered...

nope, you didnot read my posts carefully.... tvrd+dina = tvrdina ... = strong + celtic ending for town, fortified settlement tvrd+ava is tvrdava which is quite different from tvrđava but tvrd + dava = strong + dacian ending for town/fortified settlement can give tvrđava those 2 examples in...

it was about word "gradina" -din is celtic ending, not Greek celtic? Dagne is wrong "glava" = head..it is a word, not a suffix... it may appear (rarely) in the end of word e.g. as part of coin name as in "Triglav" (tri = 3, Triglav is mountain in Slovenia and one of Slavic deities) well...

though when provoked by Croat nationalists, I like to emphasize the clues indicating potential Turkic origin of Croats... I am pretty sure their tribal identity was Slavic, and before that probably Celtic... same holds for Serbs... in fact I think I2 are Cimmerians/Gomer people and original...

I know that relation exists from mythology... but I am not really familiar with writings of ancient Greek historians... when I quote something it is because on internet it is easy to search through books...

there is no -dav(plus -a for female nouns, plus -o for neutral geneder nouns) suffix in south Slavic designating location, settlement -dav suffix would be used to denote way in which something is... e.g. krivudav put = road with many turns (krivo = not straight) so, in coin "tvrđava" it is...

how exactly does I2a being in Europe 3000BC exclude it from being settled in parts of Asia as well in some points of time? according to my understanding, when we talk of I2 related tribal names we do also talk about following folks...

exactly that is why I separate believing in God from believing in ideology spread by some particular institutionalized religion...