Search results

Current distribution (estimate obviously as people in Southeast Europe are undersampled at subclade level) for E-V13 and R1b-Z2103 (upstream from Z2106) National averages (all haplos) in Southeast Europe:

To make a separate, but related comment on what a Thracian/Dacian/proto-Balkan individual might have looked like, we might have actually got that answer last week. From the paper on Scythians, it appears that there were "Scythian" communities in Southern Moldova, who unsurprisingly were settled...

Romanisation didn't suddenly stop overnight and Romans, who wer likely mostly of Balkan stock, did not withdraw completely. Just at the Southern border of the Danube, in what is now Timoc in Serbia and where Vlachs exist to this day, Dacians and other romanised and to-be romanised locals lived...

Thanks, here's mine:

Hmm, interesting, I'll have to dig deeper. Do you have any compendium on I2-Din in this region? I'll get the panel from YSEQ soon btw, so I'll hopefully get a deeper look at subclade level. My current assignment is via livingdna.

I won't take any sides because I haven't read about I-S17250 and the link to White Croats. However if you were to look at the frequencies of Y4460 from below, doesn't it look like a more likely candidate considering its frequency in old White Croat territory (Ukraine -> Moldova -> Romania ->...

You need medical attention ASAP.

It will be hard, but not impossible. You'll need to download your 23andme raw data and ask for a report from http://www.lm-genetics.ovh

I'd wager that it came from the North and that the current peak in Bosnians has arisen due to their isolation in the mountains.

Your ethnic group is what your parents identified as. But if you are asking about your Y-DNA then these 2 sites will be useful: http://blog.vayda.pl/en/i2a-dinaric-subclade-y3120-2/ http://i2aproject.blogspot.com/

Ehm, it's still alive and kicking, especially in Austria and Italy.

Let's put it this way. We're already aware that everyone in the Balkans is a mix of something Balkan and something from the North of it. To debate about the actual distribution of the two within a modern population, we need solid Iron Age to early medieval samples. Moderns as a reference for...

Looks pretty average to me, considering the small number of samples. If you want someone that's outlying compared to the available samples there then go and pick mine from custom users (Dorkymon).

The default, which is basically the same as nMonte3.R

You are assuming that Cypriots and East Sicilians can work as proxies for Balkans IA since they are both from the South. Same goes for Lithuanians and Slavic Bohemia. You couldn't be farther from the truth in both cases. Model Sample Sample Age BCE Fit Anatolia IA Balkans IA Baltic IA...

Look, I am not looking for quarrel, but I've already explained that a 2014 model doesn't really hold a candle to one from 2018, considering all the discoveries that happened since. You can choose to believe what you want, but those scientific papers have been updated since with the info that...

I told you already that there are a dozen better methodologies out there, including the latest one I shared. Yours is simply deceiving. Lithuanians are not a proxy for early medieval Slavs, just as Arabs are not a proxy for Anatolian Farmers (moreover pre-Slavic people from the Balkans since...

Everything, you don't share any significant drift with Lithuanians or modern people from Middle East and neither do I. Thus neither of those nor most of the other models on the map are suggestive of the admixture sources in modern people. Now if they were to replace those moderns with Anatolian...

Unless I'm missing something, Slavs didn't exist as an entity at that point in time. If you are referring to the model then in that case Balkan Iron Age will be redundant, as it will get replaced by the new Dacian/Thracian reference. If one of the guys were to be atypical compared to the...

That study was outdated even in 2014.