Search results

K3 GedrosiaDNA Population E_Eurasian 1.68 SSA - W_Eurasian 98.32 Using 1 population approximation: 1 English @ 0.000000 2 French @ 0.659104 3 French_South @ 0.988674 4 Albanian @ 1.127320 5 Bergamo @ 1.217764 6 Croatian @ 1.356668 7 Czech @ 1.438362 8 Greek @ 1.510967 9 Norwegian @...

Population S_Indian - Mediterranean 39.55 Siberian 1.16 Wht_Nile_River - Amerindian - S_African 0.15 E_Asian - Caucasian 11.81 NE_European 41.52 Omo_River - W_African - Horn_Of_Africa 0.89 Oceanian - Beringian 0.39...

chapter on the sea-people phenomena and the terramare collapse Cambridge 2016 'Human Mobility and Technological Transfer in the Prehistoric Mediterranean'...

MDLP K11 Population African - Amerindian - ASI - Basal 8.33 Iran-Mesolithic 2.19 Neolithic 41.05 Oceanic 0.21 EHG 23.35 SEA - Siberian 0.28 WHG 24.59 Using 1 population approximation: 1 Maros_BA @ 12.583154 2 Germany_BA @ 14.103176 3...

puntDNAL K12ancient Population Sub-Saharan - Amerindian 0.06 South_Asian 0.83 Near_East 5.43 Siberian - European_HG 31.79 Caucasus_HG 19.15 South_African_HG - Anatolian_NF 41.56 East_Asian - Oceanian - Beringian 1.17 1 Alberstedt_LN_I0118 @ 12.400862 2...

Population North_Atlantic 34.89 Baltic 17.17 West_Med 23.53 West_Asian 5.94 East_Med 14.70 Red_Sea 2.60 South_Asian - East_Asian - Siberian 0.58 Amerindian 0.25 Oceanian 0.34 Northeast_African - Sub-Saharan -

Population Amerindian - Arabian - Armenian 2.05 Basque 2.99 Central_African - Central_Euro 6.22 East_African - East_Asian - East_Balkan 1.80 East_Central_Asian - East_Central_Euro - East_Med 7.21 Eastern_Euro 5.61...

not sure about these thirteen romans but there will be a paper incl NGS on romans of the same period[imperial1st-3rd] and also rome city vicinity next year or another time; p18/19 https://docs.wixstatic.com/ugd/5c6c25_a4232f3ff6cc4b1d8cacc54b47a9d5d7.pdf the samples are most prob the same...

@Angela #533 K25 sardinian-sicilian and why sardinians were removed from that cluster in K29 https://anthrogenica.com/showthread.php?12817-New-K25-Admixture-Calculator-at-GenePlaza-com/page54 It seems that the enhanced drift In Sardinians, Who are part of the SC European references in the K...

fully agree with that and in fact never saw it otherwise, it truly might or might not be the case; judging by the dynamics of the networks throughout the metallurgical ages based on actual archaeology and so far known aDNA there are some hints already for italy yet only extensive aDNA will...

sounds great, me not paying a dime and theyll having more 'stinking' money is for sure the sweetest deal for all; so no problems at all, if that is how it adds up (more data/more research = less industry more free charity) than sign me up;

this is for sure true that large data-sets and extensive research based on will always be for positive out comes, yet in the end it will also always be about money after all it is an industry(pharma) and i think in that manner and magnitude (collecting data/blood) has been going on for some time...

fully agree with that, and in this case specific the stigmatizing CHG as something alien is truly completely off as you correctly pointed out that the steppe-related ancestry itself is largely derived from it Yamnaya_Samara 4.1.2:EHG49,7 CHG50,3 / 4.1.3:WHG2,8 EHG47 CHG50,1 (mathieosn et al...

fully agree i think DNA.Land might even be the most detailed for south european ancestry yet the way i see it i do view all calcs (i tested with at least) as equal reputable; maybe its a shift between CHG/WHG which tilts the north_italian either side? though in my case it was first mostly...

practically diffused between the two clusters east med(levantine) and west med(south europe)+ sardinian on their own; at myHeritage i get ~33% italian and 7.9% greek and at K29 it is all 37% greek-albanian but these are two different calculators with different definitions and clusters and kurd...

well now you have your answer as to why i omitted it, because there is no point in discussing numbers from a link that does not work meaning if you had the link yourself you could make your own assessment and when it works i will give you that link, basically just results sikeliot posted (i...

exactly, and exactly what i wrote #60; myHeritage (judging by the results/ but no link) defined their 'italian' based on the north_it/tuscan cluster hence that is what that means, and why so many south italians and sicilians do not score it in large amounts several in fact as dismal 10% and...

??? what ? well he didnt give them to me he posted them public but yes courtesy of sikeliot you can find a lot of myHeritage results south italians and sicilians in that thread on anthrogenica; revealing a diff dynamic in this calc from other calcs despite same populations, now is that more fun...

the myheritage results? anthrogenica is still down no link possible to the sikeliot posts, when it works again ill link it all; would make more sense in that way (with a link attached);

no, you skipped the part about sardinians actually being a part of that cluster #50 at gencove; the other south cluster is a wild mash up from bulgarians > sicilians so not sure what the artist is trying to tell us with that, but it could correspond to gedmatch gradient of west_med / east_med...