Search results

Troyans arrived with Slavs from Ukraine and Belarus? Interesting...

This one is partly Church Slavonic: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ba%C5%A1ka_tablet This one is written in a spoken language: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vinodol_Codex https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavic_languages Old Church Slavonic was created in 9th century based on a local Slavic...

It was most likely a some kind of Torlakian, which is transitional to Bulgarian. Present Serbian standard language, based on the language of Croats and Bosnians, was accepted in Serbia as late as in the middle of 19th century. However, the ekavian accent, which is a feature of Torlakian, was...

Croats have used all three dialects as a mother tongue since medieval times. Practically all written literary tradition in all three dialects before 19th century was Croatian. So I don't see the reason why we should believe that any of them is not "original".

Slovenian is south Slavic language too. The main division exists between Eastern and Western group. Eastern Serbian dialects are transitional. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Slavic_languages#Transitional_South_Slavic_languages It should be noted that in the beginning of 19th century...

You are not much differrent from him in some matters. Are you?

What is important here is that there were two clearly identifiable sides in the admixture event, which happened during the early middle ages. We know who these sides were, so we don’t need to bother ourselves with the internal composition of each (this is what you are doing). The names are just...

I compared the result for Bulgarians from the paper (13 individuals) with the result from one sample you provided: Bulgarian_-_BulgarianD6: The paper: Side 1 (Belorussian-like): 46,0% Side 2 (Cypriot-like): 64,0% Your sample: Slavic Bohemia: 47.5% Balkans IA: 52.5% The values are quite...

I am obviously not "spreading lies" but links to scientific papers. I sugget you to read the manual. There is no reason to be uncivil.

I hoped that it is quite obvious that the groups used in the analysis are just proxies for some other groups. The point is that two sides of the admixture event are clearly identifiable, as presented with different colors. The admixture date indicates that the arrival group was most likely...

What is especially "outdated" in that study? The results presented in the interactive map do no differ from other studies, including data you are currently presenting (in percentages) especially for Romania and Bulgaria. I do not see the problem. (Btw. Was it you who clicked the minus button?)

This admixture interactive map might be helpful: http://admixturemap.paintmychromosomes.com/

The language of the ballad is Croatian, which is a Slavic language, not Latin. All texts on “stećci”, medieval tombstones, are also written in a Slavic language. There are very little or no Vlach language presence in the territories of Bosnia and Croatia. The term Vlach had different...

I agree. The most of the admixture must have happened during the early middle ages, probably during the Second Bulgarian Empire.

A nice example how it is wrong to draw conclusions about a past solely based on on present day frequencies of Y-DNA haplogroups without any insight into autosomal and ancient data.

Some quick clarification might be helpful. Present day Bosniak identity is based on Muslim faith. That is what separates them from the others. However, the medieval Bosnians were Christians and the group which have been keeping their tradition until present are - Bosnian Croats. On the other...

Vlach status was a better option then the serfdom. The migrations were permanent during the entire 17th century. Some were leaving their wives, marrying the Vlach women and converting to the Orthodox faith. http://povijest.net/o-vlaskom-pitanju/

Harrrison's Flowers (2000) Director Élie Chouraqui Cast Andie MacDowell Adrien Brody Elias Koteas Brendan Gleeson https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0216799/?ref_=fn_al_tt_1 War in Croatia seen by photojournalists. IMO one of the best war movies ever. Brutally realistic and...

That is a good question. I don't know how exactly that regions are formed, but I recognize that the regions pretty much follow the autosomal clustering that I saw in papers. That means that the geographical borders are not that important and the map is not meant to be accurate in that regard.

The links with Italy and Spain may be a signal of Roman colonists. However the shading is much stronger in Greece, Moesia and Macedonia which indicates mostly the local origin. These percentages are probably the cummulative values of all time periods. Tuscany is here just a proxy. It would be...