Search results

Thanks, i would have thought that Anatolia_Chl would have some Levant_N ancestry independant of Iran_Chl. Because Levant_Chl does have Anatolia_N ancestry right?

I'm really the least person here that can help you with that.

Thanks. Do you know roughly the difference between Anatolian_Chl and Iran_Chl?

Do somebody remember the difference between Iran_Neo like Ganj Dareh and Iran_Chl like Hajji Firuz? What ancestry increased, decreased or was introduced?

We have no ways to know.

No, the oldest pottery used was in east asia, it doesn't mean it's the only place it was invented. As far as i know, there is no concensus for an archeological link between ceramics of east asia and the middle-east. I think you speak about the post of MarkoZ from a few years back? I don't...

Baikal_Neolithic represent the eastern ancestry in the WSHG admixture, if i'm not wrong, so if we found something related to WSHG in Mesolithic/Neolithic eastern europe, it's our link. It's all question of proximate. Between different populations. For exemple, if we found something related to...

I said the following earlier. I dont know at all, we are only speculating for the sake of speculating here. But i think Q1a2 probably was originally from a population with both Western and Eastern Eurasian ancestry in good proportions. Something similar to Botai or Okunevo. Something that...

I mean, ultimately they were from an ANE core. But for exemple if they were the carriers that brought Pit-Comb Ceramic in eastern europe, they could have come from everywhere between Korea, Lake Baikal and Western Siberia. And therefore were probably a mix between ANE and East Asian.

It was actually implied that similar ancestry as Villabruna was found in individuals of the Vestonice and El Miron clusters. Wich means it already radiated in Europe in the final phase of Upper Paleolithic. So we will found individuals older than Villabruna 1 with something Villabruna/Dzudzuana...

Yes ~70% ancestry in common with Villabruna into the so-called " Common West Eurasian " group. And ~30% from the so-called " Basal Eurasian " ancestry.

I wonder too. What differentiate Villabruna from Dzudzuana? Vestonice-like ancestry or ANE, or both? Dzudzuana ancestry could have come in Southeast Europe either through Anatolia, or through Eastern Europe. We need more samples from Epipaleolithic Eastern Europe and Anatolia. And we need...

Well if you look at the graph, more Western samples have an increase of EHG ancestry, and more Eastern samples have a decrease of it. Also the little increase in CHG ancestry in Botai and EMBA Central Asia. Wich makes sense no? Afanasievo ancestry is linked with the EBA Yamnaya ancestry of the...

I dont know at all, we are only speculating for the sake of speculating here. But i think Q1a2 probably was originally from a population with both Western and Eastern Eurasian ancestry in good proportions. Something similar to Botai or Okunevo. Something that will be hard to found in Eastern...

I dont quite remember conclusions of the Damgaard paper, but i'm pretty sure EMBA from Central Steppe are not from Afanasievo. They look very Botai / Okunev ( western siberia ) like. There is no CHG ancestry in them, only something resembling EHG. So they are not linked with Yamnaya-like ancestry.

More recent, in the sense of more recent in Eastern Europe? As i said, we need way more samples to get a story down. Proper Swiderian samples would be nice. DNA of Bullet-Shaped Core Cultures of Western Siberia would be also nice. But i just think Q1a2 didn't came in Europe in the same time...

Whats interesting is that R1a even if in Eastern Europe since the Mesolithic, shows signs of contact with Siberia and ANE ancestry as shown with mtdna R1b and C1g in Karelia HG. The story of R1a seems as complicated as the one of the R1b. We will need way more datas, but i'm starting to...

Where did you get this information of Volosovo with R1b-L51? The recent paper only talks about Q1a2.

Aren't EMBA refering to Okunev people wich are East Asians admixed with Afanasievo?

We already have discussed this many times... If you really was that sure about your own hypothesis, you wouldn't spam them everywhere on the internet 24/7.