Search results

Your comments are still very vague ... not a very good indication. Still, I have to congratulate you, in roughly 15 minutes you managed to review my 100+ papers (including 26 first-author/coresponding-author publications). Sadly, you failed to identify that my topic of study wasn't "celestial...

Thank you for your return, can you provide me your qualifications justifying that you pose as being able to "evaluate" the "scientific merit" of a claim ? Up to now, you failed to produce any relevant contribution, and you just dodged a request to elaborate on your claim ... which is very...

If you want ... any argument ? Because like that, it sounds like an unsubstanciated claim. Regarding my intellectual faculties ... google my name if you want to have a glimpse ! I'm very open to discuss ideas if you can propose something a bit more elaborated than an insult. If you can...

Indeed, with the new data is sounds even better. But I'm fairly sure you don't see why, isn't it ? Let me explain it to you ! In fact, the sample(s) you speak about (don't forget the Greek one, he is also very interesting per-se) change very little things to my best fitting model : Caucasus -->...

Not only, Denisovan/Neanderthal introgressions are also identified at the SNP level. Per-se, I have nothing to "imagine", that's not how science works. Thinking that there is an "ancient DNA mafia" shaking on its fundation because of few randoms on a forum is ... how to say that politely ...

While it is clear that all moderators weren't acting that way ... Anthrogenica had serious troubles on this side. Yet, GenArchivist was providing a way better moderation with less ideological bias (which might annoy some people in fact). F-stats are very minimal basic tools, what would be the...

Ready for another Hallstatt-gate ? Would you accept Tuscan-eneolitic samples when they will pop-up ? Because last time, you tried very weird stuff, I still didn't got your reasoning about the lack of sample in France that would make samples in Germany disapear ??? That's clearly next-level...

Already back ? You are aware that Hajji-Firuz is just a little bit further on the same cline you are looking at ? LSE_o work very well with Maykop-like as source too. I will repeat it, in this area of the world, around that time ... you can nearly make pass anything. There is just no peculiar...

Still ZO1002 with HajjiFiruz_C-like population pass as an alternative model. The connection between Caucasus and Tuscany Eneolitic around 3500 BCE is published-work in peer-reviewed journals. Feel free to publish your results and analysis in peer-reviewed journals, I will gladly read what you...

Because I'm nice, and you likely failed to find this results :

HajjiFiruz_C ? Look at the graph you posted, you may find the connection. You can make it work with Aknashen if you want ... you can make work nearly anything in that part of the world at this time. You have 4 deeply divergent components merging together in various fraction ... but no peculier...

J-Z615 in Mokrin is ~1100 years appart from its TMRCA with the lineages who ended in Sardinia. While you have no issue to morph Nuragic samples in ~few centuries ... I think you can easily understand why the consideration you bring here are irrelevant. You are just trying to solve a case ~1000...

That's a big question about timing and how many "lineages" could be carried successfully by a small infiltration group. Probably, the easiest version is to have J-Z622 being a lonely injector, and then diversifying in-situ around Tuscany. Still, a movement injecting multiple lineage is not out...

Not really, it is not because one lineage of J-L283 ended in the Yamnayan that all lineages ended there. Bascially, Iran-N influenced India and Europe. For J-M241, you have two clades that have taken separated road. Here, you are just facing the same situation, one ended in Usatovo and later...

Not that much when you know how it works ... PCA is just reducing dimentionality of the problem, whereas QPadm technically conserves the whole genetic distances. But a tailored PCA is as efficient as a QPadm approach (if the problem is concerning a sufficiently small geographical region...

It is exactly what I said, you just failed to adress the geographical J-L283 diversity structure. See, you just didn't adressed the J-Z622 --> J-Z585 diversity levels. For some reasons, you want to make them arrives in Sardinia ~1800 BCE or later (I noticed that you are mentionning EBA now ...

The case is complicated because you have a pile-up signal on Tuscany ... Indeed, you have a later re-injection coming from Cetina expansion, and even likely coming from Celts for some very specific subcaldes. To explains my full model : --> J-L283 Caucasus within Maykop are of influence -->...

Sardinian samples are interesting because they provide a Z622 spot of diversity on a single Nuragic site. If you want them to arrive around ~1300 BCE in Sardinia, it didn't work because of there admixture. You can find some proponents that these clades would have been injected by Cetina culture...

Could you explain this "irrefutable" model ? Yet it is still very foggy to me. WHEN are you placing the movement toward the west ? With what place of arrival ? What would be an indication favoring a Yamnayan-related diffusion of J-L283 toward the west ... would be to find some something breaking...

On this topic, it is also important to note sampling bias. If you explore urban centers, you expect to see a larger fraction of foreigners. But at the same, pre-modern time urban centers were demographic black-holes always repopulated from the surrounding countrysides. Thus you can have a very...