Search results

As usual, when you can't impose your opinions, you become insulting. Of us, I think I'm the only one who published peer-reviewed papers (related to data analysis). This is the main difference, I'm a real data-analysis expert with a significant publication record. You are a random on internet...

You claim that Romans have the greater impact ... yet, we don't see signal in the phylogeny for Z631 or Y27522 (while we see some for Y15058). We also see signal for a lot of other clades affected by Romans. After, it is your belief, yet you have no sample and no statistical probe favoring such...

Nope, the questions I brought here are the one I'm interested to adress for years. You didn't noticed ? Maybe because you didn't read me. ??? Are you that unable to interpret data ? You have a L283 in a given population. How did he get there ? With which population ? With what movement ? There...

Why are you gathering France and Germany together ? The truth is, we got very few samples from south germany (I think it is less than 20) where we expect some J-Z597 to be during IA ... and we found one !!! So, if I follow you, when we find samples where and when I forecast them, it proves me...

As expected, it is an admixted sample with local admixture (and ~8% EEF). Did he get absorbed around Moldova from an EEF population during 4th millenium BCE ? Did he get brought here from Caucasus ? Did he expanded with Yamanaya afterward ? Did he expended before with Copper-age diffusion and...

It would be quite important to see if he is positive for something deeper than J-L283. A J-L283* wouldn't favor the same scenarii compared to some deeper clading. No deeper clading would be poorly informative, as it would fit with nearly all likely solutions for J-L283 early diffusion. A...

What paper ? Something I often say about debates is that claiming that "you won't do something" is only a way to "do it without assuming doing it". Apparently, you seems to believe that the fact we obtained a Z597+ sample from southern Germany EIA, exactly where I claimed for years that we have...

What ? Is your cognitive dissonance preventing you from reading what I wrote for nearly 3-4 years now ? No, my claim is that the ultimate origin of J-L283 is likely somewhere around the Black-sea (while there is few more exotic ideas not completely out of the picture too). The three main options...

Not really, you see me as a biased person, but because you are biased yourself. If you try to check the hour with a clock not giving the right time ... you'll even think that a well calibrated clock is wrong :eek:. You know, my "hypotheses", which are in fact results from statistical analyses...

It contains only 1 read (positive), that is a high-quality and mid-sequence read in the bam-file. No need to trust me, just download the bam file (it is very small), in few command lines you can make the check. sample : ORC007.A0101.TF SNP : YP91 (anc : C, der : T) read : T pos : 11/66...

You might want to apply your own advise ;) . There is nothing to "interpret" here ... The clades being "intermediates" is written in the paper. Repeating =\= Interpreting. No, I just didn't apply selection biases to the data. From the data, ORC007 is YP91+, period. The mis-read hypothesis is...

This claim is from the paper itself, no need of Trojet or Hunter, the hability to read is sufficient : Yet, we don't know if the placement of this samples is : --> Accurate (the phylogenic tree in the paper contains many weird stuff) --> A consequence of a lack of resolution. To me, these...

If I remember well, there is a R-L23 Punic-related sample around ~800 BCE Samples prior to that have unfolded as R-V88 according to my memmory. But here, we are so many years post R-M269 arrival in Western-Europe that there have been largely enough time for some minor lineage to migrate to...

While U5b2b5a2 might have entered North Africa during BA, uncertainties about mtDNA nodes datation are quite broad. Thus, there is still a little space for U5b2b5a2 to have entered north Africa during Neolithic (similarly to what we have for R-V88 male lineage). But most likely is indeed an...

None. In fact the paper tested staff member DNA (as usual) to verify for contamination risks. But, it is a typical mecanism from non-scientific "theoreticians", when their model didn't fit with data, then they will claim that the data have an issue. I even saw that in collaboration meeting few...

Always ? By who ? The wording "Germanic Y-DNA" is usually used to refer to the clades involved in the diffusion of the Germanic tribes. You have indeed a vast diversity of clades, that can't be grouped using Y-DNA phylogeny. Germans absorbed many clades on their way, and once absorbed, such...

You will never demonstrates that with PCAs ... a PCA can't demonstrates continuity. What can demonstrates continuity is a segment based analysis (what is in a very noisy way the Y-DNA). If you receives genetic inputs from surrounding regions, as Europe is mainly an "autosomal DNA continuum" in...

Two things : 1/ Not my argument ... I just said that the argument of your pal is "very bad", that's all. 2/ No, blondess is not purely Germanic, I said it right at the beginning. Your friends think that because there is not a massive scandinavians population in modern North Italy it means that...

As I said before on this topic, it is a very noisy estimator ... I also rounded up the numbers considering the broad error bars. In fact, yes, this is very scientific, technically you never drop a number alone, in serious science you provide either : -A number and an error bar -A confidence...

Nope, This is just the range at ~68% of considence that you can deduced from Y-DNA injection level between 0 and 600 CE under the assumption of an unbiased migration of both males and females. Keep looking for scandinavians ... good luck :ROFLMAO: